MGMAT exams

This topic has expert replies

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:22 pm
Great discussion, guys. FYI: standard deviation on our tests is about 50 points. SD on the real thing is about 30 points. GMATPrep's SD isn't published, but we know it's going to be higher than the real thing, and I just assume it's also going to be better than anything a prep company can do - so I think of it as 40 points. (Though that is totally just a guess on my part.)

I have had a lot of my higher-scoring students tell me that they think GMATPrep is easier than the real thing. I think this is because the question pool for GMATPrep is pretty shallow (that is, there aren't that many questions), so if you score very well, you essentially use up your high-level question pool and the test then feels easier than the real thing b/c the real thing will have TONS of really hard stuff to keep throwing at you.

Also, re: the "it doesn't help you to take a lot more time" issue - academic, scientifically valid studies have been done to show that, on average, the more time you spend about about 2min40sec, the less likely you are to get something right. Plus, that extra time has to come from somewhere, and typically it causes people to make careless mistakes on lower-level problems they should have gotten right but didn't because they were rushing.

Remember that, on the real thing, the questions are all written such that someone can do them in 2 min. Maybe not you, but someone. If you feel like you need 4 min to do such a problem, that's actually an indication that you don't really know how to do it b/c you can't do it in the expected 2 min timeframe.

Particularly on the math, you have to remember that, no matter how good you are, the test will give you stuff you cannot do in 2 minutes, and it will also give you stuff you cannot do at all (without, say, a textbook or an instructor sitting next to you :)). If you get sucked into spending too much time on these kinds of problems, you will have a double whammy - you'll be more likely to get that problem wrong, plus you'll likely cost yourself points elsewhere by having to rush.

I agree that some of our quant questions are too computation-intensive. We actually have an analysis algorithm we run on our own test questions as we get enough data points from students, and we are going back in and altering or dropping questions that take too long, are too easy or too hard, that aren't properly discriminating (that is, people with lower scores should be more likely to get a particular question wrong and people with higher scores should be more likely to get it right), etc.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me