# GMAT Math: Only a Kitchen Calculator

by on July 16th, 2017

There are many different approaches in tackling a GMAT Quantitative question effectively. Algebraically, working backwards from the answer choices, considering “lucky twins”—a smart test taker is flexible and takes a fresh new approach by evaluating each quantitative question individually, taking the route that is efficient and effective.

But how does said test taker become the smart test taker—what kinds of signs tip us off that we should go down a certain strategy road for a tricky and/or difficult quantitative question?

Think of the “kitchen calculator”—the kind of cheap plastic, four-digit calculator that you find at a Dollar Store that is only meant for grocery shoppers adding up the bill for bread, cheese, and milk. If you find yourself doing time-consuming multiplication or division calculations, and it seems like something the kitchen calculator cannot handle, stop and reevaluate how you are tackling the question.

Here’s a Data Sufficiency example where the kitchen calculator policy applies:

If and are positive integers, is < ?

(1)

(2)

Most test takers immediately take of the route of thinking they need to divide the fraction —and yikes, is that a messy road (turning out it is repeating). Is that difficult to divide with a kitchen calculator? No, it is not. But if you immediately recognize something cannot be cleanly divided or multiplied, then you need to think again—the GMAT is not testing your ability to do endless division calculations and make tiny, minute comparisons (say versus ). Reassess your strategy.

For this particular question, the best way to look at it is to consider rules for inequalities and think of easier numbers to estimate. is equal to , so we know that is a little bit under , so (1) is very likely sufficient on its own.

For statement (2) if I actually think about the initial inequality given—, then I should realize that flipping this will give me > . Obviously, is equal to , so is probably making (2) sufficient on its own.