-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
Know the GMAT Code: Story Problems
How are the GMAT test writers going to hide information in plain sight and get you to fall into traps?
Try out this problem in our Know the Code series and then well dig in to figure out whats going on. Note: this ones from the GMATPrep free practice problems.
*A certain group of car dealerships agreed to donate x dollars to a Red Cross chapter for each car sold during a 30-day period. What was the total amount that was expected to be donated?(1) A total of 500 cars were expected to be sold.
(2) 60 more cars were sold than expected, so that the total amount actually donated was $28,000.
(If you are new to Data Sufficiency, start here and come back to this article later.)
Ready?
1-second Glance. DS. Wall of words! Storywill need to translate.
Read. Put yourself in the story. Youre coordinating all of these donations. This group agreed to donate x dollars per car sold during a certain period.
Then, theres some curiously-worded language: theyre asking for the amount expected to be donated.
Thats weirdmost problems would ask for the amount that was actually donated. So, presumably, the amount actually donated does not match the amount expected to be donated. Well need to keep these two different amounts straight, so factor this into your notes. (Also: pay attention to your instincts when you feel that something is unusualdon't just ignore it and keep going!)
Jot.
$x / car
C = # of cars expected
Total expected donation = xC
Reflect. Briefly: what could change in this scenario to create a difference between total actually donated and total expected to be donated?
The amount, $x, donated per car sold could change; maybe the dealerships change their pledge?
It could also be the case that they expect to sell a certain number of cars in the given period, but they might end up selling a different number.
Lets look at the first statement.
(1) A total of 500 cars were expected to be sold.
This is half of the equation but indicates nothing about the dollar amount donated per car. Without any information about the money, its impossible to figure out the total amount that was expected to be donated.
Statement (1) is insufficient; eliminate choices (A) and (D).
(2) 60 more cars were sold than expected, so that the total amount actually donated was $28,000.
Heres where it gets interesting. The information here is more convolutedbe careful.
If C is the # of cars expected to be sold, then the actual number of cars sold is C + 60. If the per-car donation is still $x, then we can write a new formula for the amount actually donatedand this figure is provided in the statement, too!
Total amount actually donated = ($x / car)(number of cars actually sold)
28,000 = x(C + 60)
This information is for the actual amount donated, not the expected amountand the problem asks for the expected amount. Can you do anything with this to figure out x and C?
There is another formula, but that one has three variables: T = xC, where the T is the total expected donation. There isnt a way to manipulate the two equations to solve for a single numerical value for T.
Statement (2) is not sufficient; cross off answer (B).
Finally, put the two statements together. Now, you have C = 50 and 28,000 = x(C + 60). Plug in and you can solve for x. (Don't actually solvethis is DS!)
If you have x, can you do anything else? Yes! Statement (1) still tells you C! Multiply those two together to get the desired value: T = xC.
The correct answer is (C).
When you go through this solution, the question might seem pretty straightforward. But it would be easy, during the stress of the test, to fall into a couple of different traps.
First, if your notes arent totally clear about the expected stuff vs. the actual stuff, it would be easy to conclude that statement (2) is sufficient on its own, leading you to incorrect answer (B). Thats where the Reflect stage is so importantif you can establish ahead of time that these two scenarios exist, youll be more likely to keep the information straight when you get to statement (2).
Second, once you do put the two statements together, you have to do a sort of double-loop: first, you use the two statements to realize that you can solve for x, and then you have to remember that one of those two pieces of information actually did give you C in the first place. The trap: you already used the given information from the two statements and, since there isnt anything new elsewhere to use, you think that thats ityou can find x, but thats not enough by itself.
How to avoid that trap? Two things. First, write out your work fully and carefully. Second, know what you need to find before you start to solve.
If you have C = 50 written right there, clearly, on your scrap paper and youve just said to yourself, The two together will be sufficient if I can find both C and x, then you can say to yourself right up front, Oh, I already have C! Great, all I need to do is find x. When the two statements together give you x, voila: youre done.
Key Takeaways for Knowing the Code:
(1) For story problems, put yourself in the story. Pay attention to unusual language cues and take the time to Reflect on what they mean. That 15 or 30 seconds is well spent if you avoid traps or careless mistakes later on!
(2) Write everything down carefully. Before you evaluate a piece of information, remind yourself what you would need to find in order to say that the info is sufficient.
(3) Turn any knowledge you gain into Know the Code flash cards:
* GMATPrep questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.
Recent Articles
Archive
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009