-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
Taking the New Mini-GMAT for EMBA? Here’s How to Prep - Part 2
Last time, we talked about the IR and Verbal sections of the new Executive Assessment (EA) exam for EMBA candidates. Today, were going to dive into Quant and also talk more about your overall study.
As I mentioned last time, not much has been released as of yet, so the conclusions were drawing are preliminary. This is what I would do if I had to take the test soon, given limited data. As more information and practice materials are released, well update our thinking and approach.
Quantitative Reasoning
The Quant section will consist of the same two question types (Problem Solving and Data Sufficiency) that appear on the Verbal section of the GMAT, but youll only have to answer 14 of them, not 37. Youll be given 30 minutes or just over 2 minutes per question; this is about the same as on the GMAT.
The single biggest thing that I noticed: not one of the 15 released sample questions contains any geometry. This isnt really surprising, since geometry doesnt come into play at all in business schoolbut Im still glad to see it. (Well to not see it!)
Disclaimer: the absence of a particular topic from these 15 questions doesnt automatically mean they wont test it. In this case, though, were talking about an entire branch of mathematics! I think they would have included at least one geometry question if they were planning to test geometry on the EA.
As on the IR section, a number of the quant questions tested knowledge of percents (including percent change), fractions, and population growth / rate of change. This section did include some full-on rates material and I would expect ratios to be in the mix, as well as basic statistics: average, median, possibly some weighted average.
The sample questions do include algebra, but not some more advanced topics such as quadratic equations, functions, sequences, or absolute value. The algebra is limited to linear equations (you will, at times, have to translate words to math). This one is a bit harder to call: will they test exponents or roots, for example?
I dont know, but I did notice that a large proportion of the questions dealt with real numbers. It seems that the EA is downplaying more textbook math and emphasizing stories that are a bit closer to how you would calculate something in real life. (Again, this makes sense, given the target audience for this exam.)
Several questions covered number properties topics, including divisibility and odd & even. I would guess that positive & negative will be fair game, too. I would imagine that they wont get into combinatorics and possibly not probabilitythough thats just a guess.
If youve studied for the GMAT and are familiar with the strategies Choose Smart Numbers and Test Cases, you can use these strategies on the EA, too. You also can (and should!) estimate at times. I would expect that other strategies, such as Work Backwards, will also come into play on the EA.
In short, it looks like the EA is mostly limited to concepts and strategies that we would, in fact, use in business school. Heres what I would study from the books that we publish:
- Foundations of Math: nearly everything! You can skip geometry, roots, quadratics, and absolute value.
- Fractions, Decimals, & Percents: fractions, percents, ratios
- Algebra: linear equations; the basics of exponents and inequalities
- Word Problems: translations, statistics (average, median, weighted average), rates, population
- Number Properties: divisibility and prime, odd and even, positive and negative
- Geometry: nothing!
In our main strategy guides (everything but Foundations of Math), there are Extra chapters with more advanced material. Ignore all of those chapters.
So how should I study?
Pretty much the same way youd study if you were getting ready for the GMAT. You just dont have to learn as much, thankfully. :) Learn the underlying rules and concepts, and then learn to think your way through GMAT-format questions.
Its unclear at this point what kind of score will be considered competitive at various schools, so were all going into this a little bit blind right now. It has historically been the case that EMBA programs dont place as much emphasis on standardized test scores as MBA programs, so I wouldnt worry about trying to get an amazing score. You just want to do well enough that there arent any questions about your ability to handle the quantitative and analytical work that will be necessary once you start school.
If it were me, Id plan for about 4 to 8 weeks of regular studyperhaps 1 hour a day Monday, Wednesday, Thursday, and then a couple of 1.5 to 2-hour sessions over the week-end. You could probably cram your studies into a shorter period of time, but your brain will retain the material better if you give it some time to sink in across multiple practice sessions. And youll likely be using most of the math concepts in business school, so you really do want to learn the material for real.
Are you planning to take the EA? Have you already taken it? Let us know about your experience in the comments. Good luck and happy studying!
Recent Articles
Archive
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009