-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
GMATPrep Reading Comp: Tackling a Tough Passage - Part 4
In the first installment of this series, we deconstructed a challenging Reading Comprehension passage from the GMATPrep free exams. Pull up that page and keep it handy; it contains the full passage text. (And if youre just starting here, go through the first three parts before you continue with this one!)
At the end of the third installment, I posted the third problem for the passage. Here it is again:
Which of the following best describes an application of the principles of comparable worth as they are described in the passage?(A) The current pay, rates of increase, and rates of promotion for female mechanics are compared with those of male mechanics.
(B) The training, skills, and experience of computer programmers in one division of a corporation are compared to those of programmers making more money in another division.
(C) The number of women holding top executive positions in a corporation is compared to the number of women available for promotion to those positions, and both tallies are matched to the tallies for men in the same corporation.
(D) The skills, training, and job responsibilities of the clerks in the township tax assessors office are compared to those of the much better-paid township engineers.
(E) The working conditions of female workers in a hazardous-materials environment are reviewed and their pay schedules compared to those of all workers in similar environments across the nation.
Step 1: Identify the question
This is a weird one. Theyre asking you to apply some concepts from the passage to the new scenarios described in the answer choices. This one is sort of a cross between specific detail (find something in the passage) and inference (deduce something that must follow from information in the passage). You need to find a scenario that fits with the principles of comparable worth.
Step 2: Find the proof
What are the principles of comparable worth? Find and review them.
Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay, insists that the values of certain tasks performed in dissimilar jobs can be compared. In the last decade, this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so.
In short, CW is a way to help close pay gaps and it works well even when youre dealing with different jobs, unlike some other methods.
Step 3: Predict an answer
Obviously, you arent going to be able to predict whatever scenarios the answers detail, but you can try to articulate what characteristic(s) the correct answer should have.
The correct answer should go along with CW principles. The scenario described should help to close pay gaps among people with different jobs.
Step 4: Find a match in the answers
Dive in!
(A) The current pay, rates of increase, and rates of promotion for female mechanics are compared with those of male mechanics.
Female mechanics and male mechanics are doing the same job, not different jobs. This one doesnt fit CW.
(B) The training, skills, and experience of computer programmers in one division of a corporation are compared to those of programmers making more money in another division.
The divisions might be different, but were still talking about the same job: computer programmer. This one also does not fit.
(C) The number of women holding top executive positions in a corporation is compared to the number of women available for promotion to those positions, and both tallies are matched to the tallies for men in the same corporation.
This one is sort of comparing people in different jobs: the people who hold executive positions vs. the people who don't, but might be promoted. The focus of the comparison, though, is not about addressing any pay gap. Its just talking about the number of people in each group. This one isnt the right answer.
(D) The skills, training, and job responsibilities of the clerks in the township tax assessors office are compared to those of the much better-paid township engineers.
Okay, weve got two different jobs: clerks and engineers. Oh, and they have a difference in pay: the engineers make a lot more. This one hits the two main criteria. Leave it in.
(E) The working conditions of female workers in a hazardous-materials environment are reviewed and their pay schedules compared to those of all workers in similar environments across the nation.
This choice doesnt specify an actual jobwhat are the workers doing? And are they doing similar things or different things? We do know that theyre working in the same dangerous environment, so if we assume anything, wed probably assume that theyre performing similar jobs. But answer (D) already works, and were not supposed to assume anyway. This one isnt the right answer.
The correct answer is (D).
Sometimes, youre going to get a question that doesn't fall neatly into one of the common categories. When this happens, you can usually use your knowledge of other question types to get to the answer. You may have something like this one, which is sort of a cross between specific detail and inference. Sometimes, you may get one that looks more like a Critical Reasoning problemthese can ask you to strengthen or weaken something that was claimed in the passage.
Its rare, though, to see a question thats completely unlike anything youve ever seen before anywhere on the test. If that does happen, assume that its likely an experimental question. If you think you can tackle it in a reasonable amount of time, feel free to try, but dont spend any extra time. And if, when you dive in, the problem turns out to be more taxing than you thought, pick your favorite letter and move on.
Heres the fourth and final problem in the set. Good luck!
According to the passage, comparable worth principles are different in which of the following ways from other mandates intended to reduce or eliminate pay inequities?(A) Comparable worth principles address changes in the pay schedules of male as well as female workers.
(B) Comparable worth principles can be applied to employees in both the public and the private sector.
(C) Comparable worth principles emphasize the training and skill of workers.
(D) Comparable worth principles require changes in the employers resource allocation.
(E) Comparable worth principles can be used to quantify the value of elements of dissimilar jobs.
In the last installment of this series, well talk about how to work your way through the problem above.
Key Takeaways for Application questions
(1) This question type is not as common as other types; you may or may not see one on the test. Theyre asking you to take some specific detail in the passage and apply it to new scenarios described in the answer choices.
(2) You cant truly predict an answer (step 3) because the scenarios could be anything, but you can articulate the kinds of characteristics that the correct answer should have. In this case, the correct answer had to go along with the two main CW details: it addresses pay gaps for people with dissimilar jobs.
(3) If you keep those two principles in mind while analyzing each answer (jot them down!), your job will be made easier. Now, instead of trying to analyze each choice from scratch, youre checking each choice against your little list of criteriaand eliminating any that dont match.
* GMATPrep questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.
Recent Articles
Archive
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009