• Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20

    Redeem

GMATPrep Reading Comp: Tackling a Tough Passage - Part 4

by , Feb 14, 2016

reading copyIn the first installment of this series, we deconstructed a challenging Reading Comprehension passage from the GMATPrep free exams. Pull up that page and keep it handy; it contains the full passage text. (And if youre just starting here, go through the first three parts before you continue with this one!)

At the end of the third installment, I posted the third problem for the passage. Here it is again:

Which of the following best describes an application of the principles of comparable worth as they are described in the passage?

(A) The current pay, rates of increase, and rates of promotion for female mechanics are compared with those of male mechanics.

(B) The training, skills, and experience of computer programmers in one division of a corporation are compared to those of programmers making more money in another division.

(C) The number of women holding top executive positions in a corporation is compared to the number of women available for promotion to those positions, and both tallies are matched to the tallies for men in the same corporation.

(D) The skills, training, and job responsibilities of the clerks in the township tax assessors office are compared to those of the much better-paid township engineers.

(E) The working conditions of female workers in a hazardous-materials environment are reviewed and their pay schedules compared to those of all workers in similar environments across the nation.

Step 1: Identify the question

This is a weird one. Theyre asking you to apply some concepts from the passage to the new scenarios described in the answer choices. This one is sort of a cross between specific detail (find something in the passage) and inference (deduce something that must follow from information in the passage). You need to find a scenario that fits with the principles of comparable worth.

Step 2: Find the proof

What are the principles of comparable worth? Find and review them.

Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay, insists that the values of certain tasks performed in dissimilar jobs can be compared. In the last decade, this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so.

In short, CW is a way to help close pay gaps and it works well even when youre dealing with different jobs, unlike some other methods.

Step 3: Predict an answer

Obviously, you arent going to be able to predict whatever scenarios the answers detail, but you can try to articulate what characteristic(s) the correct answer should have.

The correct answer should go along with CW principles. The scenario described should help to close pay gaps among people with different jobs.

Step 4: Find a match in the answers

Dive in!

(A) The current pay, rates of increase, and rates of promotion for female mechanics are compared with those of male mechanics.

Female mechanics and male mechanics are doing the same job, not different jobs. This one doesnt fit CW.

(B) The training, skills, and experience of computer programmers in one division of a corporation are compared to those of programmers making more money in another division.

The divisions might be different, but were still talking about the same job: computer programmer. This one also does not fit.

(C) The number of women holding top executive positions in a corporation is compared to the number of women available for promotion to those positions, and both tallies are matched to the tallies for men in the same corporation.

This one is sort of comparing people in different jobs: the people who hold executive positions vs. the people who don't, but might be promoted. The focus of the comparison, though, is not about addressing any pay gap. Its just talking about the number of people in each group. This one isnt the right answer.

(D) The skills, training, and job responsibilities of the clerks in the township tax assessors office are compared to those of the much better-paid township engineers.

Okay, weve got two different jobs: clerks and engineers. Oh, and they have a difference in pay: the engineers make a lot more. This one hits the two main criteria. Leave it in.

(E) The working conditions of female workers in a hazardous-materials environment are reviewed and their pay schedules compared to those of all workers in similar environments across the nation.

This choice doesnt specify an actual jobwhat are the workers doing? And are they doing similar things or different things? We do know that theyre working in the same dangerous environment, so if we assume anything, wed probably assume that theyre performing similar jobs. But answer (D) already works, and were not supposed to assume anyway. This one isnt the right answer.

The correct answer is (D).

Sometimes, youre going to get a question that doesn't fall neatly into one of the common categories. When this happens, you can usually use your knowledge of other question types to get to the answer. You may have something like this one, which is sort of a cross between specific detail and inference. Sometimes, you may get one that looks more like a Critical Reasoning problemthese can ask you to strengthen or weaken something that was claimed in the passage.

Its rare, though, to see a question thats completely unlike anything youve ever seen before anywhere on the test. If that does happen, assume that its likely an experimental question. If you think you can tackle it in a reasonable amount of time, feel free to try, but dont spend any extra time. And if, when you dive in, the problem turns out to be more taxing than you thought, pick your favorite letter and move on.

Heres the fourth and final problem in the set. Good luck!

According to the passage, comparable worth principles are different in which of the following ways from other mandates intended to reduce or eliminate pay inequities?

(A) Comparable worth principles address changes in the pay schedules of male as well as female workers.

(B) Comparable worth principles can be applied to employees in both the public and the private sector.

(C) Comparable worth principles emphasize the training and skill of workers.

(D) Comparable worth principles require changes in the employers resource allocation.

(E) Comparable worth principles can be used to quantify the value of elements of dissimilar jobs.

In the last installment of this series, well talk about how to work your way through the problem above.

Key Takeaways for Application questions

(1) This question type is not as common as other types; you may or may not see one on the test. Theyre asking you to take some specific detail in the passage and apply it to new scenarios described in the answer choices.

(2) You cant truly predict an answer (step 3) because the scenarios could be anything, but you can articulate the kinds of characteristics that the correct answer should have. In this case, the correct answer had to go along with the two main CW details: it addresses pay gaps for people with dissimilar jobs.

(3) If you keep those two principles in mind while analyzing each answer (jot them down!), your job will be made easier. Now, instead of trying to analyze each choice from scratch, youre checking each choice against your little list of criteriaand eliminating any that dont match.

* GMATPrep questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.