-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
Integrated Reasoning: Table Analysis
Ive been wanting to do this problem with you for a while, but Ive been delaying because well, youll see when you get to the table. It takes a lot of work to recreate that in a blog post. :) But that ridiculously large table is also the reason why I want to talk about this one so lets test it out!
Try the problem
This problem can be found in GMATPrep 2.0. Normally, on table problems, youre able to re-sort the data according to various column headers. I cant recreate that functionality in a blog post, but Ill give you a hint: sorting actually isnt necessary for this particular problem.
Set your timer for 2.5 minutes. (You can take up to 3 on this one, but if you do decide to use extra time, use it wisely! Otherwise, its better to cut yourself off faster.)
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures the average prices of goods and services purchased by consumers. In the United States, the CPI-U calculates the CPI for all urban customers.
The CPI-U is calculated based on prices of food, clothing, shelter, fuels, transportation fares, charges for doctors and dentists services, drugs, and other goods and services that people buy for day-to-day living. All taxes directly associated with the purchase and use of items (such as, in the United States, sales taxes) are included in the index. An increase in CPI-U by a certain fractional amount means an increase by that fractional amount in overall prices within the relevant category.For analyzing general price trends in the economy, seasonally adjusted prices are usually preferred over unadjusted prices because adjusting eliminates the effect of changes that normally occur at the same time and in about the same magnitude every year such as price movements resulting from climatic conditions, production cycles, model changeovers, and holidays.
For each of the following, select Yes if the statement is inferable from the given information. Otherwise select No.
The Solution
This table is ridiculous isnt it? And three paragraphs to start, before I even get to the question? Theres no way Im possibly going to look through all of this data in 2.5 minutes. (Hint. Thats one clue to solving these kinds of questions!)
In general, on tables, read the information that tells you what the table is about and look at all of the big labels (such as the column headers), but do NOT try to read / remember / understand all of the actual data points. Youll use whatever data you need when you get a specific question about that data but not before!
In this case, the first paragraph tells us that this CPI-U thing calculates average prices on a bunch of things for a certain population (urban consumers in the US). The second paragraph starts off by listing a bunch of categories ignore them. If you need to know the specific categories, you can come back here later. In fact, ignore most of the details here until we figure out what the questions are about.
The third paragraph explains that we generally prefer to use seasonally adjusted prices. A quick glance at the table shows us that it includes both adjusted and unadjusted numbers. It also explains why ignore this. Many, if not most, people will have used a minute or more at this point, so dont spend that time now. If you need to know why, you can come back here later to understand.
Finally, glance at the table labels. The columns list a bunch of individual months from 2010 and those are labeled seasonally adjusted changes from preceding month. Notice two important things here: These numbers are seasonally adjusted, not unadjusted, and each monthly figure is based on the change from the preceding month. The final column is for a whole 12 month period and these numbers are unadjusted. Finally, there are a million individual categories listed in the rows. L
Im not 100% sure that I understand the difference between adjusted and unadjusted but I dont care about that right now. Ill figure that out if I need to based on a specific question. Just keep going!
Now its time to examine the statements; heres the first one:
The changes in seasonally adjusted prices for used cars and trucks between March 2010 and September 2010 were in most cases less in magnitude than the changes in seasonally adjusted prices of new vehicles for the same period.
Lets see. They mention two categories: used cars and trucks and new vehicles. Great, I only need to look at those two rows. They also specifically mention adjusted for these, so I only care about the monthly columns. Scan until you find the right rows; luckily, theyre already right next to each other in the table.
The question asks about the magnitude of the changes in the two categories, so we need to compare them, month by month, to see which changed more and which changed less. For March 2010, the magnitude of change for used cars and trucks was 0.5, but only 0.1 for new vehicles. For that month, then, the magnitude of change was larger for the used cars and trucks. Compare the other months. In each case, the magnitude of change (the distance from zero) is larger for used cars and trucks. (This was true even in September 2010 the change was negative, but it was -0.7, which is 0.7 units away from 0. The magnitude of change for new cars was only 0.1.)
The statement says that the change for used cars and trucks was in most cases less in magnitude, but thats not true. During all of the months in question, however, the change in magnitude (from zero) for used cars and trucks was greater.
Select No for statement 1.
Heres the second statement:
The seasonally adjusted CPI-U for all items was higher in March 2010 than in the previous month.
This time, the statement is directing me to the all items category in the month-by-month (adjusted) timeframe. Thats right at the top of the table. Were specifically asked about March 2010 compared to the previous month, but the table doesnt include the previous month, so how can it tell us anything at all about February?
Read the labels! Right above the months, the table says Seasonally adjusted changes from preceding month. (Emphasis added.) In other words, the figure for March 2010 is based upon the change from February 2010. That change is positive, so it is true that the number for March is higher than the number for February.
Select Yes for statement 2.
And finally our third statement:
The seasonally unadjusted change in the price of new vehicles in August 2010 over the previous month was about the same as the seasonally unadjusted change in the price of food away from home over the same period.
Read carefully! What data do they want now? Seasonally UNadjusted this time, not adjusted! The only data we have for the unadjusted category is based on the 12 months ended Sep 2010 we dont have month-by-month data! Therefore, I cant tell anything at all about what happened in August 2010 vs. July 2010 not for the UNadjusted data.
Note something very tricky. If you gloss over the Un in the word unadjusted, you might just go check the Aug and Jul columns for new vehicles and food away from home. For new vehicles, the change was 0.3. For food away from home, the change was 0.3. Those two numbers are the same and so you would pick Yes, and you would fall into the trap. We dont have any unadjusted data for the month of August alone.
Select No for statement 3.
The answers to the three statements are No, Yes, No.
Finally, notice something. How many rows and cells did you need in order to answer all three statements here? The first statement required us to use most of the cells in two adjacent rows. The second statement required us to use one cell in one row. The third statement required us to use nothing but, even if we fell into the trap, wed still only have used two cells in two different rows (one of which was a row wed already used previously).
In other words, we never have to look at the vast majority of the data in this table. They could have cut out 3/4 of the rows without changing the question at all except, perhaps, reducing the anxiety of a lot of test-takers when they saw a table with nearly 20 rows.
Key Takeaways for Table Analysis questions:
(1) You will NOT need to use all of the data, so when you see a crazy number of rows or columns, dont let yourself get anxious; instead, remind yourself that you wont need to look at most of this. Ditto for those three paragraphs of text at the top. Dont bother to read the table thoroughly or take in all of the data just know what kind of information is available, then return to whatever you need based on the question statements.
(2) For many table questions, the ability to re-sort the data is critically important to our ability to answer these questions efficiently. Sometimes, though, we dont need to sort the data at all as in this case. Learn how to decide when and how to re-sort the data.
(3) Read carefully. When you have a table, by definition, the questions are going to hinge around whether youre examining the right cell or cells from the table. Make sure you read the statements carefully with this question in mind: What group / category are they asking me about now?
* All quotes copyright and courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this material does not imply endorsement by GMAC.
Recent Articles
Archive
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009