Beat The GMAT - the MBA Social Network

 
  • Home
  • Forums
    • Forum Home Page
    • Featured Experts
    • I just Beat The GMAT!
    • Admissions Success Stories
    • GMAT Strategy
    • GMAT Math
      • Problem Solving
      • Data Sufficiency
    • GMAT Verbal and Essays
      • Sentence Correction
      • Critical Reasoning
      • Reading Comprehension
      • GMAT Essays (AWA)
    • Business School
      • Research MBA Programs
      • The MBA Application Process
      • MBA Student Life
    • RSS Feeds
  • Self Study
    • GMAT Library
    • Getting Started
      • Getting Started on Beat The GMAT
      • Intro to GMAT
    • Study Plans
      • The 60-Day GMAT Study Guide
      • Custom GMAT Study Plans
      • 700+ GMAT Student Stories
      • How to Develop a Study Plan
      • 3-Month GMAT Study Plan
      • 1-Month GMAT Study Plan
      • Verbal-Focus GMAT Study Plan
      • 2-Week GMAT Study Plan
      • Retaking the GMAT Plan
      • 3-Month TOEFL Study Plan
      • The Best 'How-To' Study List
    • Books
    • Resource Links
    • Practice
      • Daily GMAT Math Question
      • Daily GMAT Verbal Question
      • Free GMAT Flashcards
      • GMAT Error Logs and Tracking
    • Inspiration
      • I just Beat The GMAT! Success Stories
      • The Beat The GMAT Scholarship
        • 2012 Beat The GMAT Scholarship
        • Beat The GMAT Scholarship Alumni
  • GMAT Courses
    • Verified GMAT Course Reviews
    • GMAT Course Discounts
    • Economist GMAT
      • Economist GMAT Course Reviews
      • Economist GMAT Discounts
      • About Economist GMAT
    • GMAT Prep Now
      • GMAT Prep Now Discounts
      • About GMAT Prep Now
    • Kaplan
      • Kaplan Course Reviews
      • Kaplan GMAT Discounts
      • About Kaplan
    • Knewton
      • Knewton Course Reviews
      • Knewton GMAT Discounts
      • About Knewton
    • Manhattan GMAT
      • Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews
      • Manhattan GMAT Discounts
      • About Manhattan GMAT
    • The Princeton Review
      • The Princeton Review Course Reviews
      • The Princeton Review GMAT Discounts
      • About The Princeton Review
    • Veritas Prep
      • Veritas Prep Course Reviews
      • Veritas Prep GMAT Discounts
      • About Veritas Prep
  • MBA Application
    • MBA Watch
    • MBA Admissions Library
    • MBA Admissions Course
    • Expert Profile Evaluations
    • MBA Essay Breakdowns
      • 2012-2013 Top B-School Essays
      • Berkeley Haas Essays
      • Chicago Booth Essays
      • Columbia Business School Essays
      • Dartmouth Tuck Essays
      • Harvard Business School Essays
      • INSEAD Application Essays
      • Kellogg Essays
      • MIT Sloan Essays
      • Stanford GSB Essays
      • Wharton Essays
    • Research MBA Programs
      • Research MBA Programs Forum
      • School Selection
      • Business School Trends
      • International
    • The MBA Application Process
      • The MBA Application Process Forum
      • Resume
      • Business School Essays
      • Recommendations
      • Interview
      • Waitlist
      • Financial Aid
    • MBA Student Life
      • MBA Student Life Forum
      • MBA Student Life Articles
  • Blogs
    • All GMAT and MBA Blogs
    • Pre-MBA Blogs
    • MBA Student Blogs
    • Business School Blogs
    • GMAT Company Blogs
    • GMAT Tutor Blogs
    • Admissions Consultant Blogs
    • How to Add Your Blog
  • Products
    • GMAT & MBA Marketplace
    • MBA Admissions Course
    • Essay Writing Course
    • Free GMAT Flashcards
    • The 60-Day GMAT Study Guide
    • Daily GMAT Math Question
    • Daily GMAT Verbal Question
    • GMAT Error Logs and Tracking
  • MBA Watch
  • The GMAT/MBA Library
  • GMAT Discounts
  • GMAT Course Reviews
  • MBA Admissions Course

The World of Absolute Inequalities

by Economist GMAT Tutor on November 27th, 2012
7 comments
Click here to learn more about The Economist GMAT Tutor and its products & services.
Posted in
  • Absolute Value
  • Algebra
  • Data Sufficiency
  • GMAT Math
  • Inequalities

Some GMAT problems present inequalities involving absolute value. Dealing with these questions is a multi-step process:

First, isolate the absolute value so that it stands alone on one side of the inequality.

Next, differentiate between two different cases: the number case, and the variable case.

1) The number case

In the number case, the other side is a number, i.e., the inequality has the form:

|something| < Number or |something| > Number

For example:

If |x-6|< 2, what is the range of values for x?

Solve absolute values of the number case by considering two possible scenarios:

First scenario – copy the inequality without the absolute value brackets and solve:

x-6 < 2  –> x < 2+6 = 8

Second scenario – remove the absolute value brackets. Put a negative sign around the other side of the inequality, AND flip the sign:

x-6 > -2″ title=”x-6 > -2″/> –> <img src=.

2) The variable case

If the inequality has an absolute value on one side, and variables on the other side, you cannot use the two-scenario approach. We call this the variable case, and it requires finding out what the inequality really means, rather than simply solving for x. Investigate the variable case by plugging in simple numbers for the variable(s) until you find a pattern.

In addition, remember that anything greater than an absolute value must be positive, regardless of the content of the absolute value. Many GMAT questions of the variable case depend on recognizing this simple concept for easy solution.

For example:

What is the range of x for which |x+1| < x?

This inequality does not fit the |something | <  Number form, so the two scenario approach is out. Instead, investigate the inequality – what can you learn? Which numbers can you plug in?

For x to be greater than an absolute value, x must be positive. Therefore, plug in simple positive numbers to find out when the inequality is true.

If x=1, then the inequality reads |1+1|<1, and is NOT true. So x cannot be 1.

If x=2, then the inequality reads |2+1|<2, and is NOT true. So x cannot be 2 either.

Can you find a pattern? In other words, do you think that the inequality would be true for x=3? or for x=0.5?

If x is positive, then x+1 is positive as well, and |x+1| = x+1. But then the inequality cannot be true because it reads x+1 < x. It follows that there is no value of x that fits in the inequality.

Remember:

Solve inequalities with an absolute value on one side and a number on the other by considering two scenarios:

  1. First scenario – copy the inequality without the absolute value brackets and solve.
  2. Second scenario – remove the absolute value brackets. Put a negative sign around the other side of the inequality, AND flip the sign. Solve.

When solving inequalities with an absolute value on one side and a variable on the other, the two scenario approach does not help. Instead:

  1. Investigate the variable case by plugging in simple numbers for the variable(s) until you find a pattern.
  2. Remember anything greater than an absolute value must be positive, regardless of the content of the absolute value. Many GMAT questions of the variable case depend on recognizing this simple concept for easy solution.

Now, try solving the following data sufficiency question:

Is m>n?

(1) |m+n| < |m| + |n|

(2) |m| > |n| + 1

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked;
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked;
C. BOTH statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question asked, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question asked;
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question asked;
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question asked, and additional data specific to the problem are needed.

If you liked this article, let Economist GMAT Tutor know by clicking Like.

RELATED ARTICLES

7 comments

  • Harsh Naik on November 27th, 2012 at 3:19 am

    The answer should be B

    Reply to this comment
  • KB on November 27th, 2012 at 6:21 am

    B isn;t right.  M=10 & N=5, (m>n)  M=-10 & N=-5, (m<n) both of these would satisfy statement B.

    Reply to this comment
  • Prashant on November 29th, 2012 at 10:51 am

    I think the answer is E.
    1. m and n are of different signs,but we cannot determine whether m>n
    2. From this, m and n could be of same sign or different sign, but cannot determine whether m>n
    m = -5, n = +3
    m = +5, n = -3
    m = +5, n = +3

    Combining 1 and 2, we only know that m and n are of different signs and absolute value of m is 1 more than absolute value of n, but still cannot determine whether m>n.

    I close my case here :)

    Reply to this comment
  • Nitin Agarwal on November 29th, 2012 at 9:31 pm

    Hi Prashant,
    Can you please elaborate a bit on ur analysis and answer.

    Reply to this comment
    • Prashant on November 30th, 2012 at 6:34 am

      Hi Nitin
      1. This inequality will be true only if m and n have different signs. You can take any value for m and n with different sign and plugging in the values.
      When m is -ve, then m n
      Hence we cannot determine whether m > n
      Insufficient

      2. In this case, absolute value of m is one more than absolute value of n..
      Lets pick few 
      a. m = -5, n = +3 
          |m| = |-5| = 5
          |n| + 1 = |3| + 1 = 4
          5 > 4
          m 4
         m > n

      c. m = +5, n = +3
          |m| = |5| = 5
          |n| + 1 = |3| + 1 = 4
          5 > 4
          m > n

      From Above three cases we can see that (2) is insufficient to prove m > n

      Combining (1) and (2): m and n are of different signs and absolute value of m and 1 more than absolute value of n.
      We see that (a) and (b) in the analysis of 2 satisfy both cases, but still we cannot determine whether m > n.

      Please let me know whether this makes sense.

      Regards,
      Prashant

    • Prashant on November 30th, 2012 at 6:39 am

      Hi Nitin,
      Seems copy and paste did not work properly in my previous reply. I am reposting my reply.

      1. This inequality will be true only if m and n have different signs. You can take any value for m and n with different sign and plugging in the values.
      When m is -ve, then m n
      Hence we cannot determine whether m > n
      Insufficient

      2. In this case, absolute value of m is one more than absolute value of n..
      Lets pick few 
      a. m = -5, n = +3 
      |m| = |-5| = 5
      |n| + 1 = |3| + 1 = 4
      5 > 4
      m 4
      m > n

      c. m = +5, n = +3
      m| = |5| = 5
      |n| + 1 = |3| + 1 = 4
      5 > 4
      m > n

      From Above three cases we can see that (2) is insufficient to prove m > n

      Combining (1) and (2): m and n are of different signs and absolute value of m and 1 more than absolute value of n.
      We see that (a) and (b) in the analysis of 2 satisfy both cases, but still we cannot determine whether m > n.

  • Prashant on November 30th, 2012 at 6:45 am

    Hi Nitin,
    Seems copy and paste did not work properly in my last two reples. I am reposting my reply, and hope this time it comes out ok. Sorry about this.

    1. This inequality will be true only if m and n have different signs. You can take any value for m and n with different sign and plugging in the values.
    When m is -ve, then m n
    Hence we cannot determine whether m > n
    Insufficient

    2. In this case, absolute value of m is one more than absolute value of n..
    Lets pick few numbers for m and n
    a. m = -5, n = +3 
    |m| = |-5| = 5
    |n| + 1 = |3| + 1 = 4
    5 > 4
    m 4
    m > n

    c. m = +5, n = +3
    m| = |5| = 5
    |n| + 1 = |3| + 1 = 4
    5 > 4
    m > n
    From Above three cases we can see that (2) is insufficient to prove m > n

    Combining (1) and (2): m and n are of different signs and absolute value of m is 1 more than absolute value of n.
    We see that (a) and (b) in the analysis of 2 satisfy both cases, but still we cannot determine whether m > n.

    Hope this makes sense. 
    Regards,
    Prashant

    Reply to this comment

Ask a Question or Leave a Reply

The author Economist GMAT Tutor gets email notifications for all questions or replies to this post.

Guidelines:

Some HTML allowed. Keep your comments above the belt or risk having them deleted. Signup for a Gravatar to have your pictures show up by your comment.

Click here to cancel reply.

FREE GMAT PREP RESOURCES

  • FREE
    GMAT Prep Now Videos and OG13 Improvement Chart
  • FREE
    Kaplan GMAT Practice Test
  • FREE
    Knewton GMAT Challenge Videos
  • FREE
    Manhattan GMAT’s Free Guide To Getting Started With the GMAT
  • FREE
    Free 7-Day Trial with The Economist GMAT Tutor (full access)
  • FREE
    Princeton Review Practice GMAT
  • FREE
    Veritas Prep Free 7-Day Trial - GMAT On Demand

GMAT PREP DISCOUNTS

  • $139 only
    GMAT Prep Now Full Video Course
  • SAVE $150
    Select Kaplan GMAT Courses & Tutoring Services
  • $101 OFF
    Knewton GMAT Complete Prep (5 days only)
  • SAVE $210
    Manhattan GMAT Courses and Services
  • $75 OFF
    The Economist GMAT Tutor
  • 10% OFF
    The Princeton Review GMAT Courses
  • SAVE $770
    Veritas Prep GMAT Courses and Consulting Packages

All GMAT/MBA Articles

  • GMAT AWA Essays (57)
    • Analysis of Argument (29)
    • Analysis of Issue (20)
  • GMAT Horror Stories (1)
  • GMAT Integrated Reasoning (85)
    • Graphics Interpretation (8)
    • Multi-Source Reasoning (7)
    • Table Analysis (10)
    • Two-Part Analysis (10)
  • GMAT Math (758)
    • Algebra (165)
    • Arithmetic (217)
    • Data Sufficiency (260)
    • Geometry (95)
    • Number Properties (121)
    • Permutations/Combinations (27)
    • Probability (53)
    • Problem Solving (279)
    • Statistics (21)
    • Translation (1)
    • Word Problems (124)
  • GMAT Success Stories (59)
    • 600-700 Score (1)
    • 700-800 Score (54)
  • GMAT Test Prep (534)
    • Retake (45)
    • Strategy (399)
    • Stress Management (100)
    • Study Plan (159)
    • Timing (95)
  • GMAT Verbal (679)
    • Critical Reasoning (219)
    • Reading Comprehension (130)
    • Sentence Correction (350)
  • MBA Admissions (2309)
    • Admissions Consulting (611)
    • Essays (677)
    • Extracurriculars (110)
    • GMAT (335)
    • GPA (143)
    • GRE (31)
    • International Admissions (65)
    • Interviews (202)
    • MBA Fairs (37)
    • Rankings (81)
    • Recommendation Letters (163)
    • Resume (120)
    • School Selection (58)
    • School Visits (190)
    • Trends (473)
    • Waitlist (49)
    • Work Experience (219)
  • MBA and Beyond (2537)
    • Career (1591)
    • Clubs (52)
    • Financial Aid (125)
    • Recruiting (208)
    • Student Life (1197)
  • MBA News (166)
  • Videos (590)

FREE UPCOMING GMAT EVENTS

  • June 19
    Free Manhattan GMAT LiveOnline Trial Class
  • June 25
    Free Veritas Prep - Online GMAT Prep Seminar
  • July 9
    Free Kaplan GMAT Preview Class - GMAT Challenge

Follow Us

  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Beat The GMAT on Facebook

POPULAR RESOURCES

  • MBA Watch
  • MBA Admissions Video Course
  • The GMAT/MBA Library
  • 60-Day GMAT Study Guide
  • GMAT Flashcards
  • GMAT Error Logs
  • GMAT Forums

COURSE LOCATIONS

  • New York GMAT Courses
  • Los Angeles GMAT Courses
  • San Francisco GMAT Courses
  • Boston GMAT Courses
  • Chicago GMAT Courses
  • Houston GMAT Courses
  • Philadelphia GMAT Courses
  • San Diego GMAT Courses
  • Washington D.C. GMAT Courses
  • Dallas GMAT Courses

COURSE REVIEWS

  • GMAT Course Reviews
  • GMAT Tutor from The Economist
  • Grockit GMAT Reviews
  • Kaplan GMAT Reviews
  • Knewton GMAT Reviews
  • Manhattan GMAT Reviews
  • Princeton Review GMAT Reviews
  • Veritas Prep GMAT Reviews
  • About
  • Press
  • Community Rules
© Hobsons, Inc. All rights reserved. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy