How To Read A Sentence Correction Problem
After our article last week on how to read a Critical Reasoning problem, I received a request for a similar article addressing Sentence Correction (SC).
So, here you go! We’re going to address what we should do on any and every sentence correction question, regardless of the particular grammar rules tested in that problem.
Before you start: Keeping track of your thinking / answers
One of the biggest mistakes people make is not keeping track of their thinking as they assess the answers. On verbal in general, we’re usually going to do two passes through the answers. On our first pass, we’re deciding between “this is definitely wrong – I’m never going to look at this again” and “maybe…” We don’t try to decide which answer is the right answer when we haven’t even seen all of the choices yet.
Then, on our second pass, we’ll look only at the “maybe” choices. Perhaps we’ll only have one, in which case we now have our right answer. If we have more than one, then we’ll have to start comparing the two and figure out how to narrow down from there. Okay, now on to Sentence Correction specifically.
Read the original sentence in its entirety
Another big mistake people make is focusing too much on the words in the underline and not enough on the rest of the sentence. The part that isn’t underlined is correct, of course, and can’t be changed – and that’s exactly why we need to pay attention to it. Often, there are things in the non-underlined part that tell us what we need to have in the underlined part in order to match.
As you’re reading the original sentence in its entirety, ask yourself: is this all okay? Are there any definite errors? Does anything sound not-quite-right?
If we spot an actual error in the original sentence, we immediately cross off answer choice A on the scratch paper. (Remember that answer A is always identical to the original sentence.) We then scan the other answers in the same location to find any that repeat the same error and cross those off, too. Every time you find an error on SC, immediately look at the remaining answers to see whether you can cross off any others for the same reason. We repeat this process with any other actual errors in the original. (But don’t spend a ton of time hunting for those errors; if we don’t see anything pretty much right away, we should move on to another approach.)
If something sounds not-quite-right, then we ask ourselves why. Which part, specifically, sounds not quite right? How else is that particular part written in the other answer choices? If we can use these questions to identify an actual error, then we deal with it as described in the previous paragraph. If we can’t get beyond “it just doesn’t sound right,” we don’t do anything with that information; instead, we start looking for something else to use. In particular, unless we can find a definite error, we do not eliminate answer choice A at this stage.
Processing answers B, C, D, and E
After we’ve dealt with everything that we can deal with in the original sentence (and sometimes we can’t find anything to do!), we start processing the other answers. Possibly we have crossed some off already; possibly we still have all five answer choices left. Our next task is to scan the remaining answer choices vertically to find differences, or “splits.” Splits represent differences in the answer choices for the same general part of the sentence. The “split” might be as simple as a difference in one word (e.g., has vs. have) or as complicated as re-wording or moving an entire clause (e.g., changing a modifier into part of the sentence core or placing a modifier at the beginning of the sentence vs. the end).
There are typically multiple splits in any SC problem. There are a couple of important things to know about splits:
- A split does not always indicate an error! Sometimes, differences are introduced but both variations are grammatically correct; the test writers are trying to get us to waste time on something that won’t actually help us answer the question.
- There is always a split at the beginning of the underline and there is always a split at the end of the underline. That is, at least one answer choice among B, C, D, and E will vary from the original sentence at the beginning of the underline, and at least one answer choice among B, C, D, and E will vary from the original sentence at the end of the underline.
How do we use that information? First, we always know exactly where two of the splits will be: at the beginning of the choices and at the end. We can look there first to see what kinds of differences exist in this sentence (though we have to remember that a difference doesn’t necessarily mean an error).
We do not need to deal with the splits in any particular kind of order. Each person simply looks for the first one that she/he knows how to process. If we can deal with it, we deal with it and cross off any answer choices that use the version that we decided was incorrect. If we don’t know how to deal with a particular split, then we shouldn’t even try. Instead, we should immediately look for something else that we do know how to do.
Educated guessing
Hopefully, the above process will get us down to just one answer choice; this doesn’t always happen, of course. As a result, we also need to study how to make an educated guess, so that we will know what to do when we do have to guess on a problem. For example, generally speaking, in a split between “like” and “such as,” the latter form, such as, is more commonly a part of the right answer. Generally speaking, in a split between “being” and some other form that expresses the same meaning, some other form is more commonly part of the right answer. If we can put an action noun in “regular” noun form rather than gerund form, then that is also somewhat more likely to be correct. These are not actual rules – we will not always get the question right by following these guessing procedures. But we can increase the odds that we might guess right.
Go back to a bunch of SC problems you’ve already done from one category (e.g., modifiers). Identify some splits and develop some hypotheses about how and why you would guess between those splits if you weren’t sure of the rule. Then try to apply that thinking to new SC problems in future in order to see whether your guessing strategy is valid. If it isn’t working, abandon that hypothesis and try another. (This is also something you can discuss on the forums with the experts and your fellow students.)
Take-aways
On all Sentence Correction questions:
- Keep track of your thinking on your scrap paper. Your first pass is to decide between “definitely wrong” and “maybe.” Your second pass is to determine which of the “maybe” choices you’re actually going to pick.
- Read the original question in its entirety. Unless you can pinpoint a specific error, don’t eliminate answer choice A.
- Whenever you find an error, immediately scan any remaining choices and eliminate those that repeat the same error.
- Practice making educated guesses and study how you are going to make the decision when you do have to guess.


14 comments
Govardhan on June 3rd, 2010 at 12:58 am
Stacey,
I have a strange problem.I always try to read the sentence very fast and tend to become over confident. And at times even without reading all the 5 options i used to pick one.
Many-a-times i used to get right, but recently I am facing some problems. I am not getting answers right.
How to control my pacing? How to slow down my hastiness?How to do mindmapping?
Please help me.
Stacey Koprince on June 3rd, 2010 at 8:00 am
What you describe may work for you on lower-level problems, but as you get to harder problems, that method will break down.
This is literally going to be a matter of training yourself by repetition: problem by problem, day by day. Force yourself to read the entire original sentence and actually think about it BEFORE you look at the answers. If necessary, cover up the answers and don't uncover them until you have read the entire original and thought about it.
Next, keep track of your thoughts about each answer choice on your scrap paper. On your first pass through the answers DO NOT try to find the right answer. Decide only whether the choice is DEFINITELY wrong (I'm NEVER going to look at it again - with at least one specific reason why) or MAYBE right. Have a specific mark that you make when you think it's wrong (I use an X) and a specific mark that you make when you think it's a maybe (I use a question mark).
HAVE A MARK FOR EVERY ANSWER ON YOUR SCRAP PAPER. Then, look at the "maybes" and pick one. Have a third symbol that you use to indicate which one you picked (I use a circle).
Once you think you're ready to pick an answer, glance at your scrap paper. Do you have one of your three symbols next to every letter (for each answer choice)? If not, stop. Examine whichever ones don't have symbols and decide which symbols they should have. Make yourself assign a symbol to EVERY answer choice EVERY time.
Govardhan on June 3rd, 2010 at 1:17 pm
Stacey,
Thanks so much. Yeah "symbols" is the ONLY method that can help me out.
"Make yourself assign a symbol to EVERY answer choice EVERY time."
Very strong message. Indeed. I can feel the importance when u boldened them in capital letters.
Thanks a lot Stacey.
Varun on June 4th, 2010 at 1:08 am
Stacey,
Thanks a lot for giving such an insight for solving Sentence correction questions in GMAT.
Thanks,
Varun
frank1 on June 4th, 2010 at 8:50 pm
"Another big mistake people make is focusing too much on the words in the underline and not enough on the rest of the sentence. The part that isn’t underlined is correct, of course, and can’t be changed – and that’s exactly why we need to pay attention to it. Often, there are things in the non-underlined part that tell us what we need to have in the underlined part in order to match."
Superb tips
but
With respect,
I think,i have found that directly reading whole sentence again and again for each choice does take lots of time esp when sentence is very long.
(We are treating it as whole underlined sentence,which is difficult to handle most of the time)
What i do is
look at the keywords (case,verb,tense) and boundary words of the underlined part
for eg
if non underlined part ends at
sentence 1).....harry
or
2)........has
harry is boundary word in 1 and has is right boundary in 2nd type of sentence
now in most cases i can tell ,what verb is needed...if option starts with 'has' ...good for me...
(motto: how well they plug together?)
if i could not make such sense...
then i start reading whole sentences...
i dont know it is right technique or not...
but that is how i do...
Stacey Koprince on June 5th, 2010 at 8:47 am
To clarify: the article is NOT suggesting that you read every answer choice thoroughly, or that you read every answer choice as a full sentence including the non-underlined portion. That would take way too long and is absolutely NOT what to do.
The article is saying only that we should read the ORIGINAL sentence thoroughly, including the non-underlined portion, because that portion contains valuable information that can help us to evaluate the answer choices. A lot of people will focus only on the underlined portion of the original sentence, and they will then miss the clues in the non-underlined portion.
jj on June 5th, 2010 at 8:05 am
@frank1 - what is your hit rate? and what is your technique when the whole sentence is underlined?
frank1 on June 5th, 2010 at 7:34 pm
@Stacey Koprince
Sorry,i think i misintrepreted the whole sense of paragraph then.
@jj
well it doesnt work as rule as thumb,but if it does better for you(will save lots of time).
so safe option is go for it,if you can make out something do it otherwise again go with standard style.
well,my hit rate has been different according to question publishers from 60-80%
We have discussed many times that whole sentence underlined are hard to handle
reason:
you need to read each long option again and again(that is what i am suggesting to aviod)
you have lots of parts to handle....
but good news is that even in long sentence,i have not seen more than 2-3 errors(most of them in parts....for eg verb and case....).So i concentrate on those.
I am suggesting it as style but i am just typing how i do it.
still improving.
thanks
Norizam on July 11th, 2010 at 7:11 am
Hi
I have a question regarding the portion posted below:
"If we spot an actual error in the original sentence, we immediately cross off answer choice A on the scratch paper. (Remember that answer A is always identical to the original sentence.) We then scan the other answers in the same location to find any that repeat the same error and cross those off, too. Every time you find an error on SC, immediately look at the remaining answers to see whether you can cross off any others for the same reason."
Do I finish reading the question first and then start crossing out wrong answer choices or do I pause from reading and cross out the answers and then continue reading the question until I find another error? Thanks for all your help..
Stacey Koprince on July 11th, 2010 at 7:21 am
Good question. I think you could go either way.
If I am absolutely 100% sure that I have just found an error, even without reading the rest of the original sentence, then I do immediately cross off A and any others that repeat the same error. It only takes 5 or 10 seconds, because I know where to look in answers B, C, D, and E. (Note: I DO NOT read B, C, D, and E or look for anything else - I look ONLY for this one error and then I go back to the original.)
If I'm not absolutely 100% sure that I have just found an error - maybe something later in the sentence will make this okay? - then I continue reading the original sentence and wait to make my decision.
For me, the general rule I follow is this: if I have made up my mind that an error definitely exists, no question, then I immediately cross off that choice and check any remaining choices for the same error (but ONLY for that one specific error). Otherwise, it's too easy for me to forget something (such as forgetting to cross off D and E as well because they contain the same error).
KK on July 13th, 2010 at 9:55 am
Stacey,
I am facing certain problems in applying the SC strategies, as explained in Manhattan SC Guide, to OG 12 questions that are prescribed at the end of each chapter in Manhattan's SC. To your knowledge, I have completed till "Parallelism". The guide emphasizes to solve problems not by re-reading each sentence by fitting the options but by applying split and re-split methodology once the options are grouped as per S-V agreement or Parallelism etc.
I am getting only 70-75% answers correct using the latter methodology. By concentrating on the options itself, most of the times I forget the essence of the complete sentence and require to re-read it, which becomes little time consuming. Please help which method should I follow?
Thanks.
Stacey Koprince on July 13th, 2010 at 2:17 pm
Depending upon the questions you are answering, 70-75% could be a very good percentage correct. Are you answering the lower-numbered questions? The ones in the middle? The higher-numbered questions? If you are getting 75% of the harder questions right, that's a very good rate.
I assume that you have just read the above article; is that the case? If so, then I would try the technique I outlined in the article above. Pay special attention to what I wrote in the "Before you start" section. If you can get rid of 1, 2 or even 3 of the "worst" answers based on just one split or isolated thing, then you can pay more attention when you need to: when deciding between the right answer and the most tempting wrong answer. If at that point you feel the need to read the whole sentence again, that's fine. You just don't want to have to re-read the whole sentence many times.
KK on July 13th, 2010 at 8:19 pm
Stacey,
Right now I'm only attempting the questions from OG 12 that are mentioned in Manhattan SC Guide at end of each chapter. In G-M-C strategy, I got mostly lower-numbered questions correct and last two harder questions but I faced problem in middle-numbered ones. I am unable to apply split and re-split method efficiently. In S-V agreement, I got the upper middle-numbered wrong with last 2-3 questions correct. And in parallelism, I made some silly mistakes in middle-numbered while I got the last questions all correct.
Yeah I have gone through the above article and the method of "going-in-two-pass" was really helpful and time saving. Which method shall I practice?
Thanks
Stacey Koprince on July 18th, 2010 at 7:53 am
If you found the "two pass" method helpful and time saving, then that's the one you should practice. Different methods work for different people - if you're struggling with one, but another one works for you, then that answers your question!