Welcome! Check out our free B-School Guides to learn how you compare with other applicants.
Login or Register
 

lark manufacturing

This topic has 3 member replies
Bookmark
Previous Topic Next Topic
pappueshwar Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
Joined
01 Oct 2010
Posted:
234 messages
Followed by:
4 members
Thanked:
5 times
Target GMAT Score:
680
lark manufacturing Post Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:14 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Lark Manufacturing Company initiated a voluntary Quality Circles program for machine
    operators. Independent surveys of employee attitudes indicated that the machine operators
    participating in the program were less satisfied with their work situations after two years of the
    program’s existence than they were at the program’s start. Obviously, any workers who
    participate in a Quality Circles program will, as a result, become less satisfied with their jobs.

    Each of the following, if true, would weaken the conclusion drawn above EXCEPT:

    (A) The second survey occurred during a period of recession when rumors of cutbacks and
    layoffs at Lark Manufacturing were plentiful .
    (B) The surveys also showed that those Lark machine operators who neither participated in
    Quality Circles nor knew anyone who did so reported the same degree of lessened
    satisfaction with their work situations as did the Lark machine operators who participated
    in Quality Circles.
    (C) While participating in Quality Circles at Lark Manufacturing, machine operators exhibited
    two of the primary indicators of improved job satisfaction: increased productivity and
    decreased absenteeism.
    (D) Several workers at Lark Manufacturing who had participated in Quality Circles while
    employed at other companies reported that, while participating in Quality Circles in their
    previous companies, their work satisfaction had increased.
    (E) The machine operators who participated in Quality Circles reported that, when the program
    started, they felt that participation might improve their work situations.

    OA IS E. DID NT UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION. PLS ASSIST

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    yesman238 Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
    Joined
    12 Jan 2012
    Posted:
    26 messages
    Thanked:
    10 times
    Test Date:
    Mar 2012
    Target GMAT Score:
    750+
    GMAT Score:
    760
    Post Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:52 am
    Here are my thoughts:

    A - Weakens the conclusion because it offers another reason for the survey results other than decreased satisfaction (cutbacks and layoffs)

    B - Weakens the conclusion because it tackles the assumption that correlation leads to causation (this option basically says that the lessened satisfaction is not due to the program)

    C - Weakens because it invalidate the results of the survey, or viewed another way, it offers another reason for the survey results other than participation in the program. This option is saying that the survey should actually show a increase, but since it doesn't, either (1) the results are untrue, or (2) something else is causing the results.

    D - Basically the same reason as C.

    E - It doesn't weaken the conclusion because it only talks about how the workers felt about the program. It doesn't reference the conclusion at all.

    Let me know if it is still unclear.

    scholardream Rising GMAT Star Default Avatar
    Joined
    06 May 2011
    Posted:
    83 messages
    Thanked:
    5 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    750
    GMAT Score:
    610
    Post Thu Mar 22, 2012 6:00 pm
    Thanks pappueshwar, you always post challenging questions. They did help me a lot to improve my CR and help me sleep well at night because I was exhaust thinking to solve them!
    I have my approach below:
    Premise 1: LMC initiated QC.
    Premise 2: Surveys: Satisfaction decreases over 2 years
    Conclusion: ANY workers in QC -> LESS satisfied
    Question: weaken the conclusion: Participating in QC improve or not decrease Satisfaction. So I'll look for answer provide reasons to improve or at least don't decrease the satisfaction of employees.
    (A) Cutbacks & layoffs -> staffs feel dissatificated. Of course! It provides another reason to explain the decrease of satisfaction, so QC is not the reason. WEAKEN
    (B) QC has no impact on level of satisfaction. WEAKEN
    (C) QC improves satisfaction. WEAKEN
    (D) Other workers from other companies (any worker) feel satisfaction increased. WEAKEN
    (E) Before joined QC, they expected QC could help improve their work situations. NO information to conclude that participating in QC could improve or decrease their participation. The (E) is just a decription!

    Could you give your idea ?

    pappueshwar Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
    Joined
    01 Oct 2010
    Posted:
    234 messages
    Followed by:
    4 members
    Thanked:
    5 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    680
    Post Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:23 am
    hi scholar dream,

    thanks that my posts are helping you. well regarding this CR i got a a complete idea after reading your way of solving. in the first attempt i just could not understand the argument at all.

    thanks once again. its clear now

    Best Conversation Starters
    1 varun289 31 topics
    2 sana.noor 23 topics
    3 killerdrummer 21 topics
    4 Rudy414 19 topics
    5 sanaa.rizwan 14 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts
    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    		 199 posts
    2 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    		 134 posts
    3 image description Jim@StratusPrep

    Stratus Prep

    		 106 posts
    4 image description Anju@Gurome

    Gurome

    		 47 posts
    5 image description Jon@Admissionado

    Admissionado

    		 39 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts