If -6 < k < 6, is k > 1 ?
(1) 1/k > 1
(2) -k < -2
S1) 1/k >1 implies that 1/k is Positive. To be larger than 1, is must be fraction.
than multiply by k..... K<1. Answer is No.
Sufficient
S2 ) -k < -2....k>2>1 then Answer is yes
Sufficient
The answer should be D. However, both answers are contradicting each other. Is it allowable in GMAT? is the question flawed?
Thanks
Is the question flawed
This topic has expert replies
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Statement 1 implies that 0 < k < 1, while Statement 2 indicates that k > 2.If -6 < k < 6, is k > 1 ?
(1) 1/k > 1
(2) -k < -2
Since the two statements contradict each other, the problem seems flawed.
Also, the constraint in red seems irrelevant.
Each statement on its own is sufficient to determine whether k > 1, regardless of the constraint in red.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi Mo2men,
Your evaluation of this question is correct. On the Official GMAT, each of the two Facts will 'point' to the actual answer to the given question (although they might 'point' to a different answer as well - and it's your job to prove whether the answer is consistent or inconsistent). However, the two Facts will NEVER contradict one another in the way that they do in this question. What is the source of this prompt?
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Your evaluation of this question is correct. On the Official GMAT, each of the two Facts will 'point' to the actual answer to the given question (although they might 'point' to a different answer as well - and it's your job to prove whether the answer is consistent or inconsistent). However, the two Facts will NEVER contradict one another in the way that they do in this question. What is the source of this prompt?
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Jay@ManhattanReview
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3008
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2016 6:19 am
- Location: Grand Central / New York
- Thanked: 470 times
- Followed by:34 members
Hi Mo2men,Mo2men wrote:If -6 < k < 6, is k > 1 ?
(1) 1/k > 1
(2) -k < -2
S1) 1/k >1 implies that 1/k is Positive. To be larger than 1, is must be fraction.
than multiply by k..... K<1. Answer is No.
Sufficient
S2 ) -k < -2....k>2>1 then Answer is yes
Sufficient
The answer should be D. However, both answers are contradicting each other. Is it allowable in GMAT? is the question flawed?
Thanks
Your assessment is correct; the problem is flawed. I agree with Rich's and Mitch's insight.
An official DS question comprising the prompt, statement 1 and statement 2 demonstrates a holistic situation. A result from a statement must not contradict that from the other statement. If the answer to the questions is D for a "Yes/No" type of question, and statement 1 renders "Yes," statement 2 must also render "Yes;" and if statement 1 renders "No," statement 2 must also render "No."
In this question, we have two issues: 1. Answer from statement 1 is "No," while that from statement 2 is "Yes." This is not possible in an official DS question. 2. Mitch rightly pointed out that there is no bearing of the information -6 < k < 6 given in the prompt. It's redundant. An official question will not have this scenario.
Hope this helps!
Find great DS questions here: Manhattan Review GMAT Data Sufficiency Guide
-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep
Locations: New York | Bangkok | Abu Dhabi | Rome | and many more...
Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
It's possible that the first statement was meant to be 1/k < 1: it's so easy to accidentally flip a sign and miss the mistake when writing/editing a batch of math problems.