Is a < 0 ?
(1) a^3 < a^2 + 2a
(2) a^2 > a^3
Is a < 0 ? (1) a^3 < a^2 + 2a (2) a^2 > a^3
This topic has expert replies
- Anaira Mitch
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:21 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:5 members
- DavidG@VeritasPrep
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
- Location: Boston, MA
- Thanked: 1153 times
- Followed by:128 members
- GMAT Score:770
You could pick some simple numbers.Anaira Mitch wrote:Is a < 0 ?
(1) a^3 < a^2 + 2a
(2) a^2 > a^3
1) Case 1: a = 1/2. (1/8 < 1/4 + 1, so this satisfies the statement.) 1/2 is not less than 0, so the answer is NO
Case 2: a = -10. (-1000 < 100 + (-20), so this satisfies the statement.) -10 is less than 0, so the answer is YES. Statement 1 does not yield a definitive answer to the question, and is not sufficient.
2) Let's see if we can reuse the same values.
Case 1: a = 1/2. (1/4 > 1/8, so this satisfies the statement.) We already know this gives us a NO, as 1/2 is not less than 0.
Case 2: a = -10. (100 > -1000, so this satisfies the statement.) We already know this gives us a YES, as -10 is less than 0. Not sufficient.
Taken together, a could still be either 1/2 or -10, so the answer to the question could be a YES or a NO, and thus together the statements are not sufficient. The answer is E
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Jay@ManhattanReview
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3008
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2016 6:19 am
- Location: Grand Central / New York
- Thanked: 470 times
- Followed by:34 members
Hi Anaira,Anaira Mitch wrote:Is a < 0 ?
(1) a^3 < a^2 + 2a
(2) a^2 > a^3
We need to see whether a < 0 or whether a is negative.
Between the two statements, statement 2 seems to be relatively easier as it has only two terms to deal with compared to statement 1 that has three terms.
S2: a^2 > a^3
Whether a is negative or positive, a^2 is positive, so dividing the inequality by a^2, we get
a^2/a^2 > a^3/a^2
=> 1 > a
1 > a implies that for the range 0 > a, a is negative and for the range 1 > a > 0, a is positive. No unique answer. Insufficient.
Let us see statement 1 now.
S1: a^3 < a^2 + 2a
We cannot divide the inequality by 'a' to simplify it since we do not know the nature of 'a,' it can be negative or positive. Depending upon its nature, the sign of inequality would change.
The optimum way to deal with this is by testing values.
1. Say a is negative. At a = -2,
a^3 < a^2 + 2a => (-2)^3 < (-2)^2 + 2(-2) => -8 < 4 -4 => -8 < 0. The answer is YES.
2. Say a is positive. At a = 1/2 (I deliberative chose a = 1/2 since it qualifies in the range 1 > a > 0 (one of the qualified range for 'a' from statement 2),
a^3 < a^2 + 2a => (1/2)^3 < (1/2)^2 + 2(1/2) => 1/8 < 1/4 + 1 => 1/8 < 5/4. The answer is No. Insufficient.
S1 and S2:
Even after combining both the statements, we cannot conclude since both the cases taken while analyzing statement 1 also qualifies for statement 2. So no help!
The correct answer: E
Hope this helps!
Relevant book: Manhattan Review GMAT Data Sufficiency Guide
-Jay
________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep
Locations: New York | Prague | Johannesburg | Lisbon | and many more...
Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Target question: Is a < 0 ?Anaira Mitch wrote:Is a < 0 ?
(1) a³ < a² + 2a
(2) a^2 > a^3
Statement 1: a³ < a² + 2a
Subtract a² and 2a from both sides to get: a³ - a² - 2a < 0
Factor: a(a² - a - 2) < 0
Factor more: a(a - 2)(a + 1) < 0
There are several values of a that satisfy this inequality. Here are two:
Case a: a = 0.5. In this case, a > 0
Case b: a = -10. In this case, a < 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: a² > a³
Since a² must be POSITIVE here, we can divide both sides by a² to get: 1 < a
There are several values of a that satisfy this inequality. Here are two:
Case a: a = 0.5. In this case, a > 0
Case b: a = -10. In this case, a < 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statements 1 and 2 combined
There are several values of a that satisfy BOTH statements Here are two:
Case a: a = 0.5. In this case, a > 0
Case b: a = -10. In this case, a < 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT
Answer: E
Cheers,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi Anaira Mitch,
A number of the explanations provided show how TESTing VALUES is perfect for this type of prompt, so I won't rehash any of that here. Instead, it's worth noting that there are various rules/patterns regarding exponents that you should look for (especially when exponents are presented in the way that they are here).
For example:
A positive fraction, when raised to an exponent greater than 1, will get SMALLER
Example: (1/2)^3 = 1/8
A negative fraction, when raised to an exponent greater than 1, will get BIGGER
Examples: (-1/2)^2 = +1/4 (-1/2)^3 = -1/8 BOTH are greater than -1/2
A negative integer (other than -1), when raised to an exponent greater than 1, will get BIGGER or SMALLER based on whether the exponent is even or odd.
Examples (-2)^2 = +4 (-2)^3 = -8
As such, you should consider how positive fractions and/or negative numbers (both fractions and integers) behave in these situations. While it's not something that you'll be tested on often, these patterns are often the key to correctly answering these types of questions.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
A number of the explanations provided show how TESTing VALUES is perfect for this type of prompt, so I won't rehash any of that here. Instead, it's worth noting that there are various rules/patterns regarding exponents that you should look for (especially when exponents are presented in the way that they are here).
For example:
A positive fraction, when raised to an exponent greater than 1, will get SMALLER
Example: (1/2)^3 = 1/8
A negative fraction, when raised to an exponent greater than 1, will get BIGGER
Examples: (-1/2)^2 = +1/4 (-1/2)^3 = -1/8 BOTH are greater than -1/2
A negative integer (other than -1), when raised to an exponent greater than 1, will get BIGGER or SMALLER based on whether the exponent is even or odd.
Examples (-2)^2 = +4 (-2)^3 = -8
As such, you should consider how positive fractions and/or negative numbers (both fractions and integers) behave in these situations. While it's not something that you'll be tested on often, these patterns are often the key to correctly answering these types of questions.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
I think we're missing what might be the simplest explanation, so I'll add it!
S1:
a³ < a² + 2a
a³ - a² - 2a < 0
a * (a² - a - 2) < 0
a * (a - 2) * (a + 1) < 0
For this to be possible, either exactly one of these is negative or all three are negative.
Since (a - 2) is the smallest, it MUST be negative. That means a - 2 < 0, or a < 2. Not quite good enough!
S2:
a² > a³
0 > a³ - a²
0 > a² * (a - 1)
Since a² can't be negative, (a - 1) must be. From this, we know 0 > a - 1, or 1 > a. Ugh!
Taking the statements together is redundant, since S1 adds nothing to S2, so our answer is E.
S1:
a³ < a² + 2a
a³ - a² - 2a < 0
a * (a² - a - 2) < 0
a * (a - 2) * (a + 1) < 0
For this to be possible, either exactly one of these is negative or all three are negative.
Since (a - 2) is the smallest, it MUST be negative. That means a - 2 < 0, or a < 2. Not quite good enough!
S2:
a² > a³
0 > a³ - a²
0 > a² * (a - 1)
Since a² can't be negative, (a - 1) must be. From this, we know 0 > a - 1, or 1 > a. Ugh!
Taking the statements together is redundant, since S1 adds nothing to S2, so our answer is E.
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Fun follow up question:
You may have noticed that my intervals above are not comprehensive. (For instance, in S1, we can't have 0 ≥ a ≥ -1.) Did my algebra go awry, or is my solution still valid? (I promise this has some GMAT implications! )
You may have noticed that my intervals above are not comprehensive. (For instance, in S1, we can't have 0 ≥ a ≥ -1.) Did my algebra go awry, or is my solution still valid? (I promise this has some GMAT implications! )
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
One more fun follow up question! (No more in this thread, I promise.)
Suppose I take S1 and S2, and place them like so:
2a + a² > a³
a² > a³
Then I have the brilliant idea to subtract the second from the first!
2a > 0
Wow, so a > 0? All these "experts" are clueless!
But of course they aren't ... so what did I do wrong?
Suppose I take S1 and S2, and place them like so:
2a + a² > a³
a² > a³
Then I have the brilliant idea to subtract the second from the first!
2a > 0
Wow, so a > 0? All these "experts" are clueless!
But of course they aren't ... so what did I do wrong?