Welcome! Check out our free B-School Guides to learn how you compare with other applicants.
Login or Register
 

Invented Symbols & Inequalities

This topic has 3 member replies
Invented Symbols & Inequalities Post Fri May 18, 2012 5:08 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Let [[x]] represent the average of the greatest integer less than or equal to x and the least integer greater than or equal to x. Is 0 <= |a| <= 1 ?

    1) [[x]] - x = a
    2) 0 < [[a]] < 1

    OA: D (*Source: Knewton GMAT CAT Test #3)
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The explanation provided by Knewton is really complicated and long since it's testing cases using PIN - I'm wondering if there's a simpler and faster way to solve this.

    During the test, I was already lost at the question stem. *discouraged* Help is deeply appreciated!

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    aneesh.kg GMAT Destroyer!
    Joined
    16 Apr 2012
    Posted:
    382 messages
    Followed by:
    22 members
    Thanked:
    174 times
    Post Fri May 18, 2012 5:54 am
    i_have_no_cool_username wrote:
    Let [[x]] represent the average of the greatest integer less than or equal to x and the least integer greater than or equal to x. Is 0 <= |a| <= 1 ?

    1) [[x]] - x = a
    2) 0 < [[a]] < 1

    OA: D (*Source: Knewton GMAT CAT Test #3)
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The explanation provided by Knewton is really complicated and long since it's testing cases using PIN - I'm wondering if there's a simpler and faster way to solve this.

    During the test, I was already lost at the question stem. *discouraged* Help is deeply appreciated!
    Hi,
    This is a good one.

    Let's try to understand the meaning of [[x]].
    If x = 4.1, [[x]] = (4 + 5)/2 = 4.5
    If x = 3.9, [[x]] = (3 + 4)/2 = 3.5

    So, if x = Integer + d (where 'I' is its decimal part whereas 'd' is its decimal part),
    then [[x]] = I + 0.5

    Statement(1):
    [[x]] - x = (I + 0.5) - (I + d) = 0.5 - d
    |0.5 - d| will always be between 0 and 1, since d is between 0 and 0.999...
    SUFFICIENT.

    Statement(2):
    0< [[a]] < 1
    0 < I + d < 1
    Since the decimal value is always between 0 and 1, the integral value of a = 0
    So,
    0 < a < 1
    or
    0 <= |a| <= 1
    SUFFICIENT.

    (D) is correct.

    _________________
    Aneesh Bangia
    GMAT Math Coach
    aneesh.bangia@gmail.com

    GMATPad:
    Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/GMATPad

    Post Fri May 18, 2012 9:25 am
    aneesh.kg wrote:
    Statement(2):
    0< [[a]] < 1
    0 < I + d < 1
    Since the decimal value is always between 0 and 1, the integral value of a = 0
    So,
    0 < a < 1
    or
    0 <= |a| <= 1
    SUFFICIENT.

    Hi Aneesh! Thanks for the explanation - I think I understand the prompt and Statement 1 better now. It seems like the important part is to spot a pattern for x and [[x]] after testing some numbers... Also did you mean that "I" is the integer part (not the decimal part) and "d" is the decimal part? If so, then it makes sense to me.

    I still don't really understand Statement 2 though. Since the statement states 'a' in the inequality, are you using the same rules stated in the prompt for x to evaluate 'a' in statement 2? If so, 0 < d + i < 1, and if 0 < i < 0.999, then like you said d=a=0.
    In this case, a IS equal to 0, not between 0 and 1...can you explain a little bit more on how you got from a=0 to 0 < a < 1, please?

    aneesh.kg GMAT Destroyer!
    Joined
    16 Apr 2012
    Posted:
    382 messages
    Followed by:
    22 members
    Thanked:
    174 times
    Post Fri May 18, 2012 2:52 pm
    i_have_no_cool_username wrote:
    aneesh.kg wrote:
    Statement(2):
    0< [[a]] < 1
    0 < I + d < 1
    Since the decimal value is always between 0 and 1, the integral value of a = 0
    So,
    0 < a < 1
    or
    0 <= |a| <= 1
    SUFFICIENT.

    Hi Aneesh! Thanks for the explanation - I think I understand the prompt and Statement 1 better now. It seems like the important part is to spot a pattern for x and [[x]] after testing some numbers... Also did you mean that "I" is the integer part (not the decimal part) and "d" is the decimal part? If so, then it makes sense to me.

    I still don't really understand Statement 2 though. Since the statement states 'a' in the inequality, are you using the same rules stated in the prompt for x to evaluate 'a' in statement 2? If so, 0 < d + i < 1, and if 0 < i < 0.999, then like you said d=a=0.
    In this case, a IS equal to 0, not between 0 and 1...can you explain a little bit more on how you got from a=0 to 0 < a < 1, please?
    Yes, sorry for the typo. 'I' is the integral part.

    I'm using the same prompt for Statement(2) but I am thinking a little harder along with using the prompt.
    0 < [[a]] < 1
    0 < [[I + d]] < 1
    0 < I + 0.5 < 1
    If, in the above inequality I is anything except 0, the inequality will get violated. For example, I = -1 means that I + 0.5 = - 0.5, I = 1 means that I + 0.5 = 1.5. In other words, since I is an integer, 0.5 is the only value of (I + 0.5) that lies between 0 and 1.
    So, I (or the integral part of a) has to be 0.

    'a' is now left with only its decimal part.. i.e. a = 0 + d = d.
    Since 0 < d < 0.999.., 0 < a < 0.999.. also.

    Please let me know if this makes sense.

    _________________
    Aneesh Bangia
    GMAT Math Coach
    aneesh.bangia@gmail.com

    GMATPad:
    Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/GMATPad

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 varun289 42 topics
    2 greenwich 25 topics
    3 guerrero 20 topics
    4 sana.noor 19 topics
    5 killerdrummer 19 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    196 posts
    2 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    143 posts
    3 image description Anju@Gurome

    Gurome

    121 posts
    4 image description Jim@StratusPrep

    Stratus Prep

    86 posts
    5 image description David@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    41 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts