• Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider

Integer Properties.

This topic has 13 expert replies and 1 member reply
kamalakarthi Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
31 Jan 2011
Posted:
80 messages
Followed by:
2 members

Integer Properties.

Post Wed Aug 02, 2017 3:16 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    GMAT Gurus,

    In this DS question, I came to conclusion that Statement 1 is not sufficient. But, it turns out to be wrong. Can you please help on what am I missing in the big picture.

    My work: Since ab = 2, either both a and b are + ve or -ve

    in case of +ve, It could be 2 and 1 or 4 and 1/2 if it is 2 and 1 then [a] + [b] = 1 as a would be 1 and b would be 0 but this is not true if a was 4 and b was 1/2. Same for -ve as well. So, I thought statement A is not sufficient.

    Statement 2, I was able to conclude 2 is not sufficient.
    Attachments

    This post contains an attachment. You must be logged in to download/view this file. Please login or register as a user.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    Post Wed Aug 02, 2017 10:11 am
    Be careful - you are slightly misinterpreting the prompt: [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x. For any non-integer, we round down to the nearest integer. But whenever x is an integer, then [x] = x.

    Use the same testing cases approach you were using before:

    (1) ab = 2

    Case 1:
    a = 2 --> [a] = 2
    b = 1 --> [b] = 1
    [a] + [b] = 2 + 1 = 3

    We get a "no" answer to the question. So can we get a "yes" answer to the question?

    Your initial analysis was sound: a product of 2 tells us that we have (positive*positive) or (negative*negative). If both a and b are negative, then [a] and [b] must also be negative, so their sum can never equal 1.

    If both positive, then either both a and b equal the square root of 2, or one is greater and the other is smaller than the square root of 2.

    Case 2:
    a = sqrt(2) = approx. 1.4 --> [a] = 1
    b = sqrt(2) --> [b] = 1
    [a] + [b] = 2

    Again, a "no" answer to the question. Since this is the closest together that we can get the two values, it is the minimum possible value of [a] + [b]. Therefore, there is no possible way that [a] + [b] = 1. We have sufficient information to know that the answer is definitively "no."

    Does that help?

    _________________


    Ceilidh Erickson
    Manhattan Prep GMAT & GRE instructor
    EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
    Harvard Graduate School of Education


    Manhattan Prep instructors all have 99th+ percentile scores and expert teaching experience.
    Sign up for a FREE TRIAL, and learn why we have the highest ratings in the GMAT industry!

    Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week.
    Post Wed Aug 02, 2017 10:12 am
    Please also post the source of this question. It's a copyright violation not to do so!

    _________________


    Ceilidh Erickson
    Manhattan Prep GMAT & GRE instructor
    EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
    Harvard Graduate School of Education


    Manhattan Prep instructors all have 99th+ percentile scores and expert teaching experience.
    Sign up for a FREE TRIAL, and learn why we have the highest ratings in the GMAT industry!

    Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week.
    Post Wed Aug 02, 2017 10:14 am
    This formula structure of "greatest integer less than or equal to" or "least integer greater than or equal to" is very common on the GMAT. Here are some other examples to practice with:
    http://www.beatthegmat.com/ds-t276593.html#719492
    http://www.beatthegmat.com/ds-t281646.html#738122
    http://www.beatthegmat.com/if-denotes-the-t293923.html#787526

    _________________


    Ceilidh Erickson
    Manhattan Prep GMAT & GRE instructor
    EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
    Harvard Graduate School of Education


    Manhattan Prep instructors all have 99th+ percentile scores and expert teaching experience.
    Sign up for a FREE TRIAL, and learn why we have the highest ratings in the GMAT industry!

    Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week.
    Post Wed Aug 02, 2017 10:26 am

    _________________
    Brent Hanneson – Founder of GMATPrepNow.com
    Use our video course along with Beat The GMAT's free 60-Day Study Guide

    Check out the online reviews of our course
    Come see all of our free resources

    GMAT Prep Now's comprehensive video course can be used in conjunction with Beat The GMAT’s FREE 60-Day Study Guide and reach your target score in 2 months!
    kamalakarthi Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    31 Jan 2011
    Posted:
    80 messages
    Followed by:
    2 members
    Post Wed Aug 02, 2017 10:43 am
    Experts, Thanks for the reply. The source of this question is from gmatclub.com quant tests.

    Post Wed Aug 02, 2017 11:19 am
    kamalakarthi wrote:
    The source of this question is from gmatclub.com quant tests.
    Too late. The police are already on their way Smile

    _________________
    Brent Hanneson – Founder of GMATPrepNow.com
    Use our video course along with Beat The GMAT's free 60-Day Study Guide

    Check out the online reviews of our course
    Come see all of our free resources

    GMAT Prep Now's comprehensive video course can be used in conjunction with Beat The GMAT’s FREE 60-Day Study Guide and reach your target score in 2 months!
    Post Wed Aug 02, 2017 11:34 am
    Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
    kamalakarthi wrote:
    The source of this question is from gmatclub.com quant tests.
    Too late. The police are already on their way Smile
    Very Happy

    _________________


    Ceilidh Erickson
    Manhattan Prep GMAT & GRE instructor
    EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
    Harvard Graduate School of Education


    Manhattan Prep instructors all have 99th+ percentile scores and expert teaching experience.
    Sign up for a FREE TRIAL, and learn why we have the highest ratings in the GMAT industry!

    Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week.

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Post Sun Aug 06, 2017 9:52 pm
    Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
    kamalakarthi wrote:
    The source of this question is from gmatclub.com quant tests.
    Too late. The police are already on their way Smile
    But they didn't read him his copyrights, so he's off the hook Very Happy

    Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Post Sun Aug 06, 2017 9:57 pm
    kamalakarthi wrote:
    in case of +ve, It could be 2 and 1 or 4 and 1/2 if it is 2 and 1 then [a] + [b] = 1 as a would be 1 and b would be 0 but this is not true if a was 4 and b was 1/2. Same for -ve as well. So, I thought statement A is not sufficient.
    Let's assume that both a and b are positive. (If they're both negative, then obviously their floors can't sum to 1.)

    If a > 0, b > 0, and ab = 2, then AT LEAST ONE of a and b must be ≥ √2. (If they're both < √2, then their product is less than √2 * √2.) If one of them is > √2, then the other must be < √2, or else their product will be > 2.

    But whichever one is ≥ √2 must be at least [√2], or at least 1! Let's say that one is a. Then we've got 1 + [b], where b = 2/a. The only way that [b] = 0 is if [2/a] = 0, or if 0 < 2/a < 1. But multiplying that inequality by a, we get 0 < 2 < a, or 2 < a, which can't be, since we can't have both terms be greater than √2.

    So we can't get a sum of 1, no matter what.

    Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Post Sun Aug 06, 2017 10:04 pm
    Another way we could get there:

    ab = 2

    a = 2/b

    With that, we have [a] + [b] => [2/b] + [b].

    We also know that a and b must be nonnegative integers. (If one of them is negative, then the other must be negative, since a = 2/b, and if they're both negative, then [a] and [b] are both < 0.)

    Now let's suppose that [2/b] + [b] = 1. Since both [2/b] and [b] are nonnegative integers, the only way we can get a sum of 1 is if one of these = 1 and the other = 0.

    Let's take the first case, [b] = 1 and [2/b] = 0. If that's the case, then 1 ≤ b < 2 and 0 < 2/b < 1. That second inequality simplifies as 2 < b. With that in mind, we must have b > 2 ... but if b > 2, then [b] ≥ 2, and we saw above that [b] = 1. That's a contradiction, so [b] = 1 and [2/b] = 0 is impossible.

    The second case ([b] = 0 and [2/b] = 1) works much the same way.

    Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Post Sun Aug 06, 2017 10:09 pm
    One last way to get there (and to get a feel for what's happening) is trying numbers.

    A simple case if a = √2 and b = √2. That gives us [a] = 1 and [b] = 1 and [a] + [b] = 2. OK, too big, but let's try monkeying around with the numbers. For simplicity's sake, we'll make a > b.

    If a ≥ 1.5, then [a] = 2, and [a] + [b] > 1, so we can't have that either. With that in mind, we MUST have 1.5 > a ≥ √2, so a is in a pretty tight band between about 1.415 and 1.5. But if a's in that range, then b is somewhere between √2 and 2/1.5, or somewhere between 1.333... and about 1.415. With that in mind, our ranges are

    1.5 > a ≥ √2, or [a] = 1

    √2 ≥ b > 1.333..., or [b] = 1

    So by trying to keep a in the right range, we can't get any smaller than [a] + [b] = 1 + 1.

    Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!
    Post Mon Aug 07, 2017 6:19 am
    Matt@VeritasPrep wrote:
    Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
    kamalakarthi wrote:
    The source of this question is from gmatclub.com quant tests.
    Too late. The police are already on their way Smile
    But they didn't read him his copyrights, so he's off the hook Very Happy
    Perhaps, but you're not off the hook for that pun!!!

    _________________
    Brent Hanneson – Founder of GMATPrepNow.com
    Use our video course along with Beat The GMAT's free 60-Day Study Guide

    Check out the online reviews of our course
    Come see all of our free resources

    GMAT Prep Now's comprehensive video course can be used in conjunction with Beat The GMAT’s FREE 60-Day Study Guide and reach your target score in 2 months!

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Post Fri Aug 18, 2017 1:20 pm
    Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
    Matt@VeritasPrep wrote:
    Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
    kamalakarthi wrote:
    The source of this question is from gmatclub.com quant tests.
    Too late. The police are already on their way Smile
    But they didn't read him his copyrights, so he's off the hook Very Happy
    Perhaps, but you're not off the hook for that pun!!!
    Brent, you are no pun at all :p

    Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!
    Post Sat Aug 19, 2017 5:18 am
    Matt@VeritasPrep wrote:
    Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
    Matt@VeritasPrep wrote:
    Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
    kamalakarthi wrote:
    The source of this question is from gmatclub.com quant tests.
    Too late. The police are already on their way Smile
    But they didn't read him his copyrights, so he's off the hook Very Happy
    Perhaps, but you're not off the hook for that pun!!!
    Brent, you are no pun at all :p
    I happun to believe I'm very pun Smile

    _________________
    Brent Hanneson – Founder of GMATPrepNow.com
    Use our video course along with Beat The GMAT's free 60-Day Study Guide

    Check out the online reviews of our course
    Come see all of our free resources

    GMAT Prep Now's comprehensive video course can be used in conjunction with Beat The GMAT’s FREE 60-Day Study Guide and reach your target score in 2 months!

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 132 topics
    2 lheiannie07 65 topics
    3 LUANDATO 54 topics
    4 Roland2rule 43 topics
    5 ardz24 40 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    133 posts
    2 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    114 posts
    3 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    113 posts
    4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    109 posts
    5 image description DavidG@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    72 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts