Is x> 10^10?
1) x> 2^34
2) x= 2^35
OA d
Inequality 3
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:48 am
- Thanked: 5 times
- DanaJ
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2567
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
- Thanked: 712 times
- Followed by:550 members
- GMAT Score:770
First of all, let's see what 10^10 really means. Since 10 = 2*5, 10^10 = (2*5)^10 = (2^10)*(5^10).
IMHO, this problem requires solid knowledge about powers.
1. You should notice that 128 is greater than 125. 128 = 2^7 and 125 = 5^3. This means that 2^7 > 5^3. Raise this to the 3rd power and you get that 2^21 > 5^9. Now, since 8 > 5 or 2^3 > 5^1, we can use there last two inequalities to solve the problem. You get that:
2^21 > 5^9
2^3 > 5^1
Multiply these two and you get that 2^24 > 5^10.
Use the fact that 2^10 = 2^10 and multiply this with the previous equation to get that 2^(24+10) > (5^10)*(2^10). This is the equivalent of 2^34 > 10^10. Since x > 2^34, then in the end x > 2^34 > 10^10. So 1 is sufficient.
2. You basically use the same line of thought as above to prove that 2^34 > 10^10. Since x = 2^35 is greater than 2^34 (two times greater, to be more specific), then x is certainly greater than 10^10.
So 2 is also sufficient.
Answer D.
IMHO, this problem requires solid knowledge about powers.
1. You should notice that 128 is greater than 125. 128 = 2^7 and 125 = 5^3. This means that 2^7 > 5^3. Raise this to the 3rd power and you get that 2^21 > 5^9. Now, since 8 > 5 or 2^3 > 5^1, we can use there last two inequalities to solve the problem. You get that:
2^21 > 5^9
2^3 > 5^1
Multiply these two and you get that 2^24 > 5^10.
Use the fact that 2^10 = 2^10 and multiply this with the previous equation to get that 2^(24+10) > (5^10)*(2^10). This is the equivalent of 2^34 > 10^10. Since x > 2^34, then in the end x > 2^34 > 10^10. So 1 is sufficient.
2. You basically use the same line of thought as above to prove that 2^34 > 10^10. Since x = 2^35 is greater than 2^34 (two times greater, to be more specific), then x is certainly greater than 10^10.
So 2 is also sufficient.
Answer D.
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:48 am
- Thanked: 5 times
- DanaJ
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2567
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
- Thanked: 712 times
- Followed by:550 members
- GMAT Score:770
I really don't know if there are any other approaches... I know this might seem like a very unlikely explanation, but since powers are my thing (i know powers of 2 up to ^13, powers of 3 up to ^6, powers of 5 up to ^4 and some other useful powers - i've learned them by heart because I've had a lot of practice over the years), it's easy to figure out like this... I guess you'll just have to see if anyone else sees any other explanation...
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Dana's approach to statement 1 is great, but we need to do absolutely no work to know that (2) is sufficient.willbeatthegmat wrote:danaj u r doin a great job.....is it the only approach to crack this kind of questions?
The question asks if x is bigger than a fixed number.
(2) gives us the exact value for x. Since we know the exact value for x, we can certainly compare it to another fixed number to determine which one is bigger.
Remember, in DS we don't care WHAT the answer is, we just care if we can GET an answer. Therefore, we can say (2) is sufficient even if we don't whether or not it gives us a "yes" or a "no" answer.
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:57 am
- Location: Minneapolis
- Thanked: 1 times
Stuart : You are exactly right. This saves out butt in GMAT. We dont need to solve (2). Great Job. Back to basics.....
Raj Peddisetty
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:41 pm
- Location: London, UK
- Thanked: 5 times
- GMAT Score:770
2^34 = (2^10)^3 * 2^4
= 1024^3 * 16
And that expression must be greater than:
(10^3)^3 * 10
10^9 * 10
10^10
A Maths teacher of mine referred to 2^10 as "the binary thousand".
Once I knew that, it was clear that 2^35 must also be greater, although Stuart's point still applies.
= 1024^3 * 16
And that expression must be greater than:
(10^3)^3 * 10
10^9 * 10
10^10
A Maths teacher of mine referred to 2^10 as "the binary thousand".
Once I knew that, it was clear that 2^35 must also be greater, although Stuart's point still applies.
80% of success is showing up -- Woody Allen
Another approach....
10^10 = (2x2x2.5)^10 => 2^20x2.5^10 ...(1)
Case 1 X>2^34 ..so X>2^20 x2^14 as X^a+b =X^a x X^b
Comparing with st (1) ....x>10^10 if 2.5^10 >2^14
or taking square root on both sides 2.5 ^5 >2^7 =>2.5^5 > 128
we know 25^2 is 625...hence 6.25x6.25x2.5 = 90 (approx)
Not greater
Hence A is sufficient
Case 2....X=2^35 is a fixed number
Hence ans is D
10^10 = (2x2x2.5)^10 => 2^20x2.5^10 ...(1)
Case 1 X>2^34 ..so X>2^20 x2^14 as X^a+b =X^a x X^b
Comparing with st (1) ....x>10^10 if 2.5^10 >2^14
or taking square root on both sides 2.5 ^5 >2^7 =>2.5^5 > 128
we know 25^2 is 625...hence 6.25x6.25x2.5 = 90 (approx)
Not greater
Hence A is sufficient
Case 2....X=2^35 is a fixed number
Hence ans is D
- sureshbala
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:32 am
- Location: Delhi
- Thanked: 84 times
- Followed by:9 members
If you know the value of log 2 this is pretty simple.
The question asks is x > 10^10
i.e log x > 10
Statement 1:
x > 2^34
i.e log x > 34(0.3010)
Thus log x > 10.2
Hence from statement 1 we can conclude that x> 10^10
Statement 2:
Since the exact value of x is given we can conclude whether it will be more or less than that of 10^10.
Hence statement 2 alone is sufficient
It would definitely help if you can remember the log values of 2, 3, 5 and 7.
Remember these two simple rules of logarithms.
1. Let a and b both be greater than 1.
If log a > log b then a > b
If log a < log b then a < b
Converse is also true
2. Let 0 < a , b < 1.
If log a > log b then a < b
If log a < log b then a > b
Converse is also true
Even if you think along the lines of what DanaJ mentioned, you can avoid all the calculations to conclude 2^24 > 5^10.
log 2 = 0.3010 and log 5 = 0.6989
So log 2^24 = 24(0.3) = 7.2 and log 5^10 = 10(0.6989) = 6.98
Anyway, once you know how to apply logarithms there is no need to get to this stage and instead as I mentioned earlier you can easily conclude that statement 1 is sufficient
The question asks is x > 10^10
i.e log x > 10
Statement 1:
x > 2^34
i.e log x > 34(0.3010)
Thus log x > 10.2
Hence from statement 1 we can conclude that x> 10^10
Statement 2:
Since the exact value of x is given we can conclude whether it will be more or less than that of 10^10.
Hence statement 2 alone is sufficient
It would definitely help if you can remember the log values of 2, 3, 5 and 7.
Remember these two simple rules of logarithms.
1. Let a and b both be greater than 1.
If log a > log b then a > b
If log a < log b then a < b
Converse is also true
2. Let 0 < a , b < 1.
If log a > log b then a < b
If log a < log b then a > b
Converse is also true
Even if you think along the lines of what DanaJ mentioned, you can avoid all the calculations to conclude 2^24 > 5^10.
log 2 = 0.3010 and log 5 = 0.6989
So log 2^24 = 24(0.3) = 7.2 and log 5^10 = 10(0.6989) = 6.98
Anyway, once you know how to apply logarithms there is no need to get to this stage and instead as I mentioned earlier you can easily conclude that statement 1 is sufficient
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:18 am
- Thanked: 2 times
Guys .... had the equation been x < 10^10
then of course ans wud have been D
but it is given x > 10^10
Acc to me ans is certainly E
long explanation... so can't writebut throwing a hint...
Take min x ie = 2^34
after solving
3225 * 3225 > 4096 * 4096
so here RHS is higher.... N we can still incease LHS because we have taken MINIMUM value of X
so can't say anything...
had sign reversed , we cud say something but not NOW...
same with EQUATION 2
Hence Ans is E
give one more try...
i hope u too find this one correct... no matter wat OA says....
then of course ans wud have been D
but it is given x > 10^10
Acc to me ans is certainly E
long explanation... so can't writebut throwing a hint...
Take min x ie = 2^34
after solving
3225 * 3225 > 4096 * 4096
so here RHS is higher.... N we can still incease LHS because we have taken MINIMUM value of X
so can't say anything...
had sign reversed , we cud say something but not NOW...
same with EQUATION 2
Hence Ans is E
give one more try...
i hope u too find this one correct... no matter wat OA says....
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi,girish3131 wrote:Guys .... had the equation been x < 10^10
then of course ans wud have been D
but it is given x > 10^10
Acc to me ans is certainly E
long explanation... so can't writebut throwing a hint...
Take min x ie = 2^34
after solving
3225 * 3225 > 4096 * 4096
so here RHS is higher.... N we can still incease LHS because we have taken MINIMUM value of X
so can't say anything...
had sign reversed , we cud say something but not NOW...
same with EQUATION 2
Hence Ans is E
give one more try...
i hope u too find this one correct... no matter wat OA says....
you seem to have reversed the question.
The question, not the equations, is:
Is x > 10^10?
So, we don't take it as a given that x is greater than 10^10 - that's what we're investigating.
It's also important to note that this is a yes/no question; we don't care if the answser is "yes" or "no", as long as we can get a definite answer to the question.
Even without doing math, we know that (2) is sufficient, since it provides an exact value for x. If we know the exact value for x, we can certainly determine whether it's bigger than 10^10.
Dana solved (1) and compared it to 10^10, proving that if (1) is true, x will always be greater than 10^10, so that statement is also sufficient alone.
Your mistake is a very common one in DS: instead of treating the question as a question, you treated it as a statement of reality. If we assume that the question is true statement, we've already answered it!
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
To compare exponents, try to get SIMILAR BASES.Is x> 10^10?
1) x> 2^34
2) x= 2^35
It is helpful to have memorized the powers of 2 up to 2¹�.
2¹� = 1024 ≈ 10³.
Statement 1: x > 2³�
2³� > 10¹�
2¹� * 2¹� * 2¹� * 2� > 10¹�
10³ * 10³ * 10³ * 16 > 10¹�
10� * 16 > 10� * 10
The lefthand side is greater than the righthand side.
Thus, x > 10¹�.
SUFFICIENT.
Statement 2: x = 2³�
Since the value of x is known, we can determine whether x > 10¹�.
SUFFICIENT.
The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
- GMATinsight
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1100
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:34 pm
- Location: New Delhi, India
- Thanked: 205 times
- Followed by:24 members
Another approach to the question could beIs x> 10^10?
1) x> 2^34
2) x= 2^35
Step -1 Statement 2 gives a specific value of x which can certainly be compared with 10^10 and it is definitely sufficient to answer the question
Which leaves us with Options B and D only (A,C and E options can be ruled out)
Step - 2 x>2^34
Exponents can be compared when the powers on both sides are equal
2^34 = 2^4 x 2^10 x 2^10 x 2^10 = 16 x 1024 x 1024 x 1024 = 16 x 10^3 x 10^3 x 10^3 = 16 x 10^9
10^10 = 10 x 10^9
But 16 x 10^9 > 10 x 10^9
Therefore SUFFICIENT
Answer: Option D
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Mitch's approach is a great one; one other trick you can use here is the fact that 10·³ ≈ 2. (These values are very close; the one on the left is 10^(.3), if the superscript doesn't read properly on your browser.)
Since 10·³ ≈ 2, we know that 2³� ≈ (10·³)³� ≈ 10¹�·², which is greater than 10¹�. Hence x > 2³� > 10¹�.
Similarly, 2³� ≈ (10·³)³� ≈ 10¹¹, so 2³� > 10¹�.
Since 10·³ ≈ 2, we know that 2³� ≈ (10·³)³� ≈ 10¹�·², which is greater than 10¹�. Hence x > 2³� > 10¹�.
Similarly, 2³� ≈ (10·³)³� ≈ 10¹¹, so 2³� > 10¹�.