• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to $200 Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Practice Test & Review How would you score if you took the GMAT Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Trial & Practice Exam BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 1 Hour Free BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Veritas GMAT Class Experience Lesson 1 Live Free Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5 Day FREE Trial Study Smarter, Not Harder Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Get 300+ Practice Questions 25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5-Day Free Trial 5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant Available with Beat the GMAT members only code ## In Gandania This topic has 1 expert reply and 0 member replies ### Top Member lheiannie07 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 07 Sep 2017 Posted: 299 messages Followed by: 1 members #### In Gandania Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:35 pm In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the incidence of smoking-related health problems has risen steadily for the last twenty years. The health secretary recently proposed a series of laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use in Gandania. Profits from tobacco sales, however, account for ten percent of Gandania's annual revenues. Therefore, Gandania cannot afford to institute the proposed laws. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? (A) All health care in Gandania is government-funded. (B) Implementing the proposed laws is not likely to cause a significant increase in the amount of tobacco Gandania exports. (C) The percentage of revenue Gandania receives from tobacco sales has remained steady in recent years. (D) Profits from tobacco sales far surpass any other single source of revenue for the Gandanian government. (E) No government official in Gandania has ever previously proposed laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use. What is wrong with the other options? Can experts explain? Thanks OA A Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums! ### GMAT/MBA Expert DavidG@VeritasPrep Legendary Member Joined 14 Jan 2015 Posted: 2457 messages Followed by: 115 members Upvotes: 1153 GMAT Score: 770 Top Reply Thu Sep 14, 2017 6:42 am lheiannie07 wrote: In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the incidence of smoking-related health problems has risen steadily for the last twenty years. The health secretary recently proposed a series of laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use in Gandania. Profits from tobacco sales, however, account for ten percent of Gandania's annual revenues. Therefore, Gandania cannot afford to institute the proposed laws. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? (A) All health care in Gandania is government-funded. (B) Implementing the proposed laws is not likely to cause a significant increase in the amount of tobacco Gandania exports. (C) The percentage of revenue Gandania receives from tobacco sales has remained steady in recent years. (D) Profits from tobacco sales far surpass any other single source of revenue for the Gandanian government. (E) No government official in Gandania has ever previously proposed laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use. What is wrong with the other options? Can experts explain? Thanks OA A Conclusion: Gandania cannot afford to implement anti-smoking regulation Premises: Gandania gets 10% of its revenue from tobacco sales; smoking-related health problems have risen If we're trying to weaken the conclusion, we want to show that Gandania can afford the regulation. Well, if the regulation is going to reduce revenue that the government would have received from tobacco sales, then the there must be some kind of ancillary benefit to the regulations, perhaps a reduction in expenses in another domain. This is what A gives us. If smoking is causing health-related problems, and the government has to pay for all health care, then presumably, it's expensive for the government if a good deal of the population smokes. Thus, if the regulations reduce smoking rates, the money saved in health care expense may offset the profits forgone from lower tobacco sales. _________________ Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor Veritas Prep Reviews Save$100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

Thanked by: lheiannie07
Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!

### Best Conversation Starters

1 lheiannie07 112 topics
2 swerve 64 topics
3 LUANDATO 64 topics
4 ardz24 61 topics
5 AAPL 57 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

227 posts
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

176 posts
3 Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

168 posts
4 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

138 posts
5 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

129 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts