Agree with Harsha. That's somewhat my strategy towards CR questions too. I guess as one improves with practice, it becomes easier to reach the answer before reads the options. So POE works until one reaches that level of expertiseharshavardhanc wrote:machoman,gmatmachoman wrote:
Mohit!
I shuld remind you that plz dont use POE !! POE is a weapon,use it only when u run out of reasoning & i wont recommend it during prep stages.
I have seen you using POE in couple of places.But I felt its hightime i shuld "hint" you regrading the negativities of POE.
1.When u use POE, u r NOT using reasoning. So ur probability of getting a right answer is P<=0.5
2.Same attitude will continue in the future by dampening ur TP
3.POE when u use for strengthening questions will manyatimes makes u too opt for wrong/scope shift answers as Strengthen based CR bring in new info to the argument which u may reject assuming its not relevant!
Kindly follow patterns,u culd get the link by practice! I am not against POE,but Dont overuse it.Yeah in RC,in some case for cross-checking use POE.!!
I think otherwise. In every verbal question , especially CR, it's always the POE which you employ while finding out the credited response.
I'm sure that everyone reads each and every option before confirming an answer(a must in this exam).
Now, in CR questions, you always disprove an incorrect option by finding out a piece of information which is not present in the stimulus or which is out of scope etcetera. You call it reasoning, but essentially you are eliminating an option.
However, you cannot disprove the credited response for one simple reason : "It is absolutely correct from whatever perspective you view it." There is nothing in the correct choice which is out of scope, too extreme or unstated in the passage.
If we are lucky and our prephrased answer matches with options A,B or C, we keep it as the contender and check the rest ones to make sure if they are better than the contender. If you look carefully, this checking is again POE.
If our prephrased answer matches with the last option, we basically would have applied POE here as well before reaching it.
So, by birds-eye-view, it's always POE which is employed in CR questions.
Hope you agree with me
Hypertensive Personality
- mohit11
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 9:08 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:5 members
- GMAT Score:730
- harshavardhanc
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 11:47 pm
- Location: India
- Thanked: 68 times
- GMAT Score:680
mohit11 wrote:
Agree with Harsha. That's somewhat my strategy towards CR questions too. I guess as one improves with practice, it becomes easier to reach the answer before reads the options. So POE works until one reaches that level of expertise
But, no matter whatever level we reach, we MUST cross-off every other option before we move on to the next question.
Regards,
Harsha
Harsha
-
gmatmachoman
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
- Thanked: 173 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:710
Agreed guys! that was a insightful discussion.Agreed with Mohit & harsha!we MUST cross-off every other option before we move on to the next question. Very Valid..if we follow this religiously 41 is for sure in verbal.harshavardhanc wrote:mohit11 wrote:
Agree with Harsha. That's somewhat my strategy towards CR questions too. I guess as one improves with practice, it becomes easier to reach the answer before reads the options. So POE works until one reaches that level of expertiseThanks !
But, no matter whatever level we reach, we MUST cross-off every other option before we move on to the next question.
In maths we have a privilege.But for verbal,that "Cross-OFF" technique is Mandatory.One has to practice it while prepping!I do forget sometimes and do it in my mind/brain.but Physically Crossing off is "beneficial"( Its my IMO..)..
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
The premise is about a CORRELATION:Salaj wrote:Hi
I am really confused why (d) is the correct answer and (e) is not. Please help.
Thanks
Sinha
A combination of nervousness and anxiety has been OBSERVED in people with high blood pressure.
The conclusion is about CAUSATION:
A combination of nervousness and anxiety CAUSES high blood pressure.
The argument incorrectly assumes that a CORRELATION is sufficient to prove CAUSATION.
D correctly describes this flaw:
The argument takes a correlation between personality traits and high blood pressure as proof that the traits cause high blood pressure.
The correct answer is D.
E: The argument focuses on nervousness and anxiety only, ignoring other personality traits that people with high blood pressure might have.
This option implies the following:
It is a flaw not to consider EVERY TRAIT that people with high blood pressure might have.
This expectation is unreasonable.
It is not possible for an argument to consider EVERY POSSIBLE TRAIT.
Eliminate E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

















