• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

## How to diffrentiate between position and evidence

tagged by:

This topic has 1 expert reply and 3 member replies
gmatrant Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
03 Oct 2007
Posted:
416 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Thanked:
10 times

#### How to diffrentiate between position and evidence

Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:25 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
• Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure on this year's ballot, would prohibit the ownership of handguns within the city's limits. Under

the plan, gun owners would have a 90-day grace period to turn in their weapons to authorities. Proponents of the proposition argue that <B>fewer handguns on the streets would lead to less violent crime, making the city safer for all of its citizens. Unfortunately, the ban would actually have the opposite effect. Since only law abiding citizens would honor the ban, armed criminals would not only keep their weapons but would also have the confidence to act with impunity on a population that could no longer defend itself.</B>

a)Does the bold phrase represent an evidence or a position of the author?

b)Are there any links/tips to attack bold face questions.

Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
Tue Nov 13, 2007 12:18 am
this looks like a position statement. evidence would present some sort of data ("a similar ban at another city showed that criminal activity involving weapons increased by 15%...")

gmatrant Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
03 Oct 2007
Posted:
416 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Thanked:
10 times
Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:48 pm
Anonymous wrote:
this looks like a position statement. evidence would present some sort of data ("a similar ban at another city showed that criminal activity involving weapons increased by 15%...")
well it is termed as an evidence ?? Its from Manhattan GMAT test.

### GMAT/MBA Expert

Joined
13 Feb 2006
Posted:
6700 messages
Followed by:
959 members
Thanked:
1248 times
Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:04 pm
How does MGMAT define evidence? My impression is that it is a position statement...

Unfortunately, I haven't found much info about boldface question strategies to date. I'm always looking for more, so please share them in this community if you find some.

Here's one Boldface Strategy Link to give you some grounding...

_________________
Sorin Istrate - Community Manager

MBA Watch - Your one-stop shop for all MBA program research

### GMAT/MBA Expert

Stacey Koprince GMAT Instructor
Joined
27 Dec 2006
Posted:
2228 messages
Followed by:
678 members
Thanked:
639 times
GMAT Score:
780
Tue Nov 13, 2007 7:26 pm
The complete boldface actually covers several different types of info.

This discusses the counterargument; it is not at all part of the author's argument:
fewer handguns on the streets would lead to less violent crime, making the city safer for all of its citizens.

This is the author's conclusion; it is a claim:
Unfortunately, the ban would actually have the opposite effect.

The author's conclusion / claim is also his position.

This is the author's support for his conclusion; support can be facts or claims - in this case, it is more of a claim than a fact:
Since only law abiding citizens would honor the ban, armed criminals would not only keep their weapons but would also have the confidence to act with impunity on a population that could no longer defend itself.

Note that the author claims this last as his evidence - that doesn't make it evidence in the police sense, something that we could use to prosecute a case (or the equivalent). But the author is using it as evidence to support his conclusion. (Even if we think it's kind of weak.)

_________________
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week.

### Best Conversation Starters

1 Vincen 180 topics
2 lheiannie07 61 topics
3 Roland2rule 54 topics
4 ardz24 44 topics
5 VJesus12 14 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

155 posts
2 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

105 posts
3 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

101 posts
4 Jay@ManhattanReview

Manhattan Review

82 posts
5 Matt@VeritasPrep

Veritas Prep

80 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts