health care company

[This topic has 5 expert replies and 23 member replies]
Free $100 Amazon.com Gift Card - Buy a GMAT course using a Beat The GMAT discount code between Mar 8-22 and get a $100 Amazon.com Gift Card. Learn more!
Post New Topic   Post Reply

Kelly
Just gettin' started!

Default Avatar

Joined: 19 Nov 2008
Posts: 14

Thanks given: 3
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: Vermont

Test Date: Jan. 09
Target GMAT Score: 700
GMAT Score: 600

Topic: health care company
PostMon Jul 13, 2009 1:59 pm

Elapsed Time:
00:00
Lap   Why a timer is critical to improving your score

After several years of rapid growth, the healthy care company became one of the largest health care providers in the metropolitan area, [url]while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its payment to [/url]doctors and hospitals.

A. while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its payment to
B. while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business and fell months behind in its payment to
C. but then it proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its paying
D. but then proving unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in paying
E. but then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in paying

OA is E
why not A?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vinayakdl
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!

Default Avatar

Joined: 06 May 2009
Posts: 131

Thanks given: 2
Thanked 5 times in 4 posts
Location: Chicago

PostMon Jul 13, 2009 2:08 pm

IMO E,

the author is contradicting the Company's rise and subsequent inability...and hence "but" is required here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gmat740
Moderator



Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 1189

Thanks given: 20
Thanked 58 times in 56 posts
Location: Kolkata,India

GMAT Score: 710

PostMon Jul 13, 2009 6:22 pm

I don't have any grammatical rule to reject A and B. But please look at the sentence again

Quote:
A. while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its payment to
B. while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business and fell months behind in its payment to
I find "while it then"=> redundant and awkward

C. [b]but then it proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its paying doctors and hospitals [/b]
Now you say, is this correct Very Happy
Quote:
D. but then proving unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in paying
tense error => "proved"

Quote:
but then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in paying
Perfect answer
_________________
Karan
Learn more about me
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
goelmohit2002
GMAT Titan

Default Avatar

Joined: 24 Dec 2008
Posts: 1799

Thanks given: 96
Thanked 25 times in 25 posts

PostMon Jul 13, 2009 10:00 pm

gmat740 wrote:
C. [b]but then it proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its paying doctors and hospitals [/b]
Hi Karan,

Can you please elaborate a bit...why C is wrong ?

Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raghu.b
Just gettin' started!

Default Avatar

Joined: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 4

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

PostMon Jul 13, 2009 11:02 pm

After several years of rapid growth, the healthy care company became one of the largest health care providers in the metropolitan area, [url]while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its payment to [/url]doctors and hospitals.

A. while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its payment to

this is wrong for two reasons - it/its reference ..it is not clear whether it is referring company or the rapid growth

B. while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business and fell months behind in its payment to

same as A

C. but then it proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its paying

same as A

D. but then proving unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in paying

this is wrong because proving and falling are not two parallel actions.

E. but then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in paying

This looks without any error. You can do a reverse check while indicates a simultaneous action where as but indicates a contrast.
Hope this helps
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
real2008
GMAT Destroyer!

Default Avatar

Joined: 01 May 2008
Posts: 500

Thanks given: 44
Thanked 7 times in 7 posts

PostTue Jul 14, 2009 1:32 am

Kelly wrote:
After several years of rapid growth, the healthy care company became one of the largest health care providers in the metropolitan area, [url]while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its payment to [/url]doctors and hospitals.

A. while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its payment to (it? metroploitan area or company)
B. while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business and fell months behind in its payment to (it? metroploitan area or company)
C. but then it proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its paying (it? metroploitan area or company)
D. but then proving unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in paying ('but' onwards a clause should follow, not a phrase)
E. but then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in paying

OA is E
why not A?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gmat740
Moderator



Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 1189

Thanks given: 20
Thanked 58 times in 56 posts
Location: Kolkata,India

GMAT Score: 710

PostTue Jul 14, 2009 3:52 am

goelmohit2002 wrote:
gmat740 wrote:
C. [b]but then it proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its paying doctors and hospitals [/b]
Hi Karan,

Can you please elaborate a bit...why C is wrong ?

Thanks
If you put C in the underline part and then read out the sentence you will find that the non-underlined part following the underlined part won't just fit in idiomatically

Hope this helps

_________________
Karan
Learn more about me
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
goelmohit2002
GMAT Titan

Default Avatar

Joined: 24 Dec 2008
Posts: 1799

Thanks given: 96
Thanked 25 times in 25 posts

PostTue Jul 14, 2009 5:39 am

gmat740 wrote:
If you put C in the underline part and then read out the sentence you will find that the non-underlined part following the underlined part won't just fit in idiomatically

Hope this helps
Hi Karan,

Can you please explain what idiom is broken....i am really not able to figure out what grammar rule is broken by C or what liking of GMAT is broken by C ?

Thanks
Mohit
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kanha81
GMAT Destroyer!

Default Avatar

Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 431

Thanks given: 10
Thanked 14 times in 14 posts

PostTue Jul 14, 2009 4:05 pm

goelmohit2002 wrote:
gmat740 wrote:
C. [b]but then it proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its paying doctors and hospitals [/b]
Hi Karan,

Can you please elaborate a bit...why C is wrong ?

Thanks
goelmohit2002,
[C] is wrong for couple of reasons-
"it" in the sentence can refer to "metropolitan area" or "health care company"
"its" in the sentence can also refer to "metropolitan area" or "health care company"

I still do not agree with gmat740 about the redundancy issue as posited in [A]. What's wrong with [A]? "while it then"- really?

_________________
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scoobydooby
GMAT Titan

Default Avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 1016

Thanks given: 56
Thanked 93 times in 90 posts

PostWed Jul 15, 2009 3:16 am

i guess the problem with C is not "it" ambiguously referring to the company or the metropolitan area. "it" logically and unambiguously does refer to the company.

the problem is in the part "falling months behind in its paying doctors and hospitals"

=>seems to say the company lags behinds in its doctors and hospitals that pay. paying seems to modify doctors and hospitals.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thanked by: goelmohit2002
ketkoag
GMAT Destroyer!

Default Avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2008
Posts: 873

Thanks given: 9
Thanked 9 times in 9 posts

PostWed Jul 15, 2009 4:44 am

scoobydooby wrote:
i guess the problem with C is not "it" ambiguously referring to the company or the metropolitan area. "it" logically and unambiguously does refer to the company.
i think "it" can refer to either company or metropolitan area in C.
i think "it" is also problematic is C.
suggestions please..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
goelmohit2002
GMAT Titan

Default Avatar

Joined: 24 Dec 2008
Posts: 1799

Thanks given: 96
Thanked 25 times in 25 posts

PostWed Jul 29, 2009 10:38 am

scoobydooby wrote:
i guess the problem with C is not "it" ambiguously referring to the company or the metropolitan area. "it" logically and unambiguously does refer to the company.

the problem is in the part "falling months behind in its paying doctors and hospitals"

=>seems to say the company lags behinds in its doctors and hospitals that pay. paying seems to modify doctors and hospitals.
Awesome Scooby !!!

This looks perfectly correct.....

If we replace "its" with Company's (its a possessive pronoun)...

then Complete sentence with C option becomes:

After several years of rapid growth, the healthy care company became one of the largest health care providers in the metropolitan area, but then Company proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in Company's paying doctors and hospitals.

This is totally awkward sentence now....says company is falling behind in company's paying doctors and hospitals.


Suggetions please !!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
goelmohit2002
GMAT Titan

Default Avatar

Joined: 24 Dec 2008
Posts: 1799

Thanks given: 96
Thanked 25 times in 25 posts

PostMon Aug 24, 2009 6:41 am

Hi All,

As per Stacey just as being is almost always avoided in GMAT....same is the case with possessive + gerund setup....

Here I guess paying is acting as gerund....and "its" is possessive....so this becomes possessive + gerund...that should be avoided in GMAT...

Please refer to Stacey's thoughts on the following thread for this issue.

http://www.beatthegmat.com/ing-modifier-three-different-versions-in-og-t38943-45.html

Can someone please confirm whether I am correct in my understanding or not ?

Thanks
Mohit
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Reply from GMAT/MBA Admissions Expert
Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor



Joined: 27 Dec 2006
Posts: 1899

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 284 times in 249 posts
Location: Montreal, Canada

GMAT Score: 780

PostMon Aug 24, 2009 9:44 am

Mohit asked me to address this one.

In this context, "while" = "at the same time as" but that's obviously NOT what's being described, so eliminate A and B.

Then, we have parallelism!

the company became X, but then <it proved / proving / proved> Y.

The subject "the company" applies to both verbs. ("but" is the parallelism marker.) So, which is parallel to became? Proved. Eliminate C ("IT proved" - we already have the subject; we don't need a pronoun) and D (proving = not parallel to became).
Smile

_________________
Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
goelmohit2002
GMAT Titan

Default Avatar

Joined: 24 Dec 2008
Posts: 1799

Thanks given: 96
Thanked 25 times in 25 posts

PostMon Aug 24, 2009 9:56 am

Stacey Koprince wrote:
Mohit asked me to address this one.

In this context, "while" = "at the same time as" but that's obviously NOT what's being described, so eliminate A and B.

Then, we have parallelism!

the company became X, but then <it proved / proving / proved> Y.

The subject "the company" applies to both verbs. ("but" is the parallelism marker.) So, which is parallel to became? Proved. Eliminate C ("IT proved" - we already have the subject; we don't need a pronoun) and D (proving = not parallel to became).
Smile
Hi Stacey,

Thanks. But can you please tell why "it" is not required in 2nd clause....

In Manhattan SC guide there are couple of examples that violate this rule and are said to be correct....For e.g....page189 of SC guide 4th edition gives this example:

She is not interested in sports, but she likes watching them on TV.

Looks like the sentence at hand and the above example of Manhattan follow the same setup....both sentences have same subjects as of previous clause.

Kindly also tell can't we kick out C based on possessive + gerund reasoning....if no....then kindly tell where is flaw in my reasoning for the same.

Many thanks
Mohit
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post New Topic   Post Reply All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2
 
Most Active Members in Last 30 Days
1. harsh.champ 562 posts
2. shashank.ism 368 posts
3. thephoenix 319 posts
4. kstv 310 posts
5. ajith 279 posts
Most Active Experts in Last 30 Days
1. lunarpower
Manhattan GMAT Teacher
87 posts
2. Stuart Kovinsky
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
63 posts
3. Lisa Anderson
Stacy Blackman Consulting
54 posts
4. Testluv
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
49 posts
5. Bryant@VeritasPrep
Veritas Prep
41 posts