• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

## Harmonic Mean Solution?

This topic has 1 expert reply and 3 member replies
student22 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
21 Dec 2009
Posted:
216 messages
Thanked:
16 times

#### Harmonic Mean Solution?

Fri May 14, 2010 8:51 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
• Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
What is the ratio of the average (arithmetic mean) height of students in class X to the average height of students in class Y?
(1) The average height of the students in class X is 120 centimeters.
(2) The average height of the students in class X and class Y combined is 126 centimeters.

OA:E

I know that this problem has been beaten to death, but I have a question. Why can't you use a harmonic mean to solve it?

I got C by using a harmonic mean. Since, technically an average height could be considered a rate, right? (Total height / number of students).

Harmonic mean = (2*(120)*Y)/(120 + Y) = 126. --> Then you simply solve for Y.

Can somebody explain to me, why the harmonic mean is not applicable in this scenario.

Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
ilikaroy Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Joined
13 May 2010
Posted:
12 messages
Thanked:
1 times
Sat May 15, 2010 9:21 pm
When the question is stating clearly that average height is arithmetic mean, how can you possibly take harmonic mean?

### GMAT/MBA Expert

Stuart Kovinsky GMAT Instructor
Joined
08 Jan 2008
Posted:
3225 messages
Followed by:
608 members
Thanked:
1710 times
GMAT Score:
800
Sun May 16, 2010 2:40 pm
student22 wrote:
What is the ratio of the average (arithmetic mean) height of students in class X to the average height of students in class Y?
(1) The average height of the students in class X is 120 centimeters.
(2) The average height of the students in class X and class Y combined is 126 centimeters.

OA:E

I know that this problem has been beaten to death, but I have a question. Why can't you use a harmonic mean to solve it?

I got C by using a harmonic mean. Since, technically an average height could be considered a rate, right? (Total height / number of students).

Harmonic mean = (2*(120)*Y)/(120 + Y) = 126. --> Then you simply solve for Y.

Can somebody explain to me, why the harmonic mean is not applicable in this scenario.
Hi,

to use a weighted average formula in this kind of question, you need to know the average of each group and the weight of each group. Since we don't know the weight of each group, there's no way to solve using harmonic mean.

Picking numbers (that are in accord with all the information given):

1 student in x with height 120, 1 student in y with height 132. Ratio of x:y is 120:132.

1 student in x with height 120, 2 students in y with height 129. Ratio of x:y is 120:129.

We can get different ratios, so we don't have enough information to solve the problem.

Thanked by: student22
Free GMAT Practice Test under Proctored Conditions! - Find a practice test near you or live and online in Kaplan's Classroom Anywhere environment. Register today!
student22 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
21 Dec 2009
Posted:
216 messages
Thanked:
16 times
Mon May 17, 2010 8:24 am
Thanks Stuart for clarifying. I mistakenly assumed that the groups here would have equal weights, when there was no real basis for me to assume that.

frank1 Legendary Member
Joined
22 Jan 2010
Posted:
537 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Thanked:
14 times
Mon May 17, 2010 7:38 pm
isn't the core of the question
avg of x + avg of y is not equal to avg of x and y combined?

### Best Conversation Starters

1 Vincen 180 topics
2 lheiannie07 61 topics
3 Roland2rule 54 topics
4 ardz24 44 topics
5 VJesus12 14 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

155 posts
2 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

105 posts
3 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

101 posts
4 Jay@ManhattanReview

Manhattan Review

82 posts
5 Matt@VeritasPrep

Veritas Prep

80 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts