GMAT Tprep

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 7:10 am

GMAT Tprep

by abhik » Sun Aug 26, 2007 10:14 am
I could not figure this out.

Please help

Thanks
Attachments
Question 1.JPG

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 12:34 pm
Location: OH
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:780

by mschling52 » Sun Aug 26, 2007 11:50 am
I agree with you that statement (1) is sufficient...since the number of red balls relative to the white and black is greater than the ratio of white balls to black and red, it follows that a red ball will have a greater probability of being chosen.

However, statement (2) only gives us b-w>r (or b>r+w). This tells us that black will have the highest chance of being chosen (higher than red and white combined), but between red and white, we cannot tell which is higher. For example, if there are 10 balls total, we could have 6 black, 3 red, and 1 white in which case red would have a higher probability. But we could also have 6 black, 3 white, and 1 red. Statement (2) would still be satisfied, but now white would be a more likely outcome.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 277
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:51 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by givemeanid » Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:03 pm
The question is asking is r > w?

1. r/b+w > w/b+r
br + rr > bw + ww
b(r-w) > ww - rr
b(r-w) > (w+r)(w-r)
r-w > k(w-r) -> since b and (w+r) are both positive, k = (w+r)/b = positive

Now, if r < w, left side is -ve and right side is +ve. The inequality doesn't hold.
So, r > w.
SUFFICIENT.

2. b - w > r
INSUFFICIENT.
So It Goes

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 7:10 am

by abhik » Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:25 pm
Thanks much. This is very helpful