GMAT Set 10 Q10

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2015 1:52 am
Followed by:4 members

GMAT Set 10 Q10

by Abhijit K » Tue Feb 24, 2015 2:59 am
A set of numbers has a property that for any number t in the set, t+2 is in the set, which of the following must also be in the set?

1.-3
2.1
3.5

a.1 only
b.2 only
c.1 and 2 only
d.2 and 3 only
e.1, 2 and 3

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Feb 24, 2015 3:43 am
The problem should read as follows:
A set of numbers has the property that for any number t in the set, t + 2 is in the set. If -1 is in the set, which of the following must also be in the set?

I. -3
II. 1
III. 5

(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) I and II only
(D) II and III only
(E) I, II, and III
Since -1 is in the set, -1+2 = 1 is in the set.
Since 1 is in the set, 1+2 = 3 is in the set.
Since 3 is in the set, 3+2 = 5 is in the set.
Only options II and III must be in the set.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2015 1:52 am
Followed by:4 members

by Abhijit K » Tue Feb 24, 2015 3:56 am
if t =-3 wont -1 be in the set?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Feb 24, 2015 4:09 am
Abhijit K wrote:if t =-3 wont -1 be in the set?
Nothing in the prompt implies that t=-3 is in the set, so the portion in red is irrelevant.
The prompt indicates that only t=-1 is in the set and that -- for any value of t -- t+2 must also be in the set.
Thus, only odd integers GREATER than -1 MUST be in the set.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Feb 24, 2015 9:26 am
Abhijit K wrote:if t =-3 wont -1 be in the set?
Yes, IF -3 is in the set, THEN -1 will be in the set. However, we aren't told that -3 is in the set.

Some people take that fact that -1 is in the set, and conclude that -3 is also in the set. These people have reversed the order of the if-then statement.

It's not uncommon for people to do this.

The if-then statement here is "If if t is in the set, then t+2 is also in the set"
Reversing the statement (to get "if t+2 is in the set, then t is also in the set") is not logically sound.

Consider this example:
Let's say: If an animal is a rabbit, then that animal has ears.
Can we then conclude that if an animal has ears then that animal is a rabbit? No.

So, in our question, the existence of t in the set guarantees the existence of t+2 in the set.
However, it is not necessarily the case that the existence of t+2 in the set guarantees the existence of tx in the set.

I hope that helps.

Here's a similar question: https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-pr ... 78170.html

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Feb 24, 2015 9:33 am
A set of numbers has the property that for any number t in the set, t + 2 is in the set. If -1 is in the set, which of the following must also be in the set?

I. -3
II. 1
III. 5

(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) I and II only
(D) II and III only
(E) I, II, and III
ASIDE: It's possible that the set contains EVERY NUMBER in the universe. It's also possible that the set contains no numbers. The objective here is to determine what MUST be true (as opposed to what COULD be true).

Apart from the t and t+2 clue, the only other clue we're given is that -1 is in the set.
According to the other clue, since -1 is in the set, then (-1)+2 must also be in the set. So, 1 MUST be in the set.
Since 1 is in the set, then 1+2 must also be in the set. So, 3 MUST be in the set.
Since 3 is in the set, then 3+2 must also be in the set. So, 5 MUST be in the set.
Since 5 is in the set, then 5+2 must also be in the set. So, 7 MUST be in the set.
And so on...

So, we can be certain that the following numbers are in the set: -1, 1, 3, 5, 7, ....
Answer: C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image