GMAT Score vs. Undergrad GPA

medea66 · Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:41 pm Post subject: GMAT Score vs. Undergrad GPA

Hi guys,

I heard that there is an inverse relationship between one's GMAT score and one's GPA. In other words, if you have a great GPA, then you can do with a lower GMAT score. I'm definitely not suggesting that you shoot for a low score, but just describing the relationship. So, if someone has a 3.8 as an undergrad and has a 3.8 as a grad student, then what kind of GMAT score would be required to get into a top-tier school?

Kelly McDonald · Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:52 pm Post subject:

I don't think there is a simple black and white answer. If your 3.8 GPA was 20 years in the past and your 550 GMAT was last month, obviously your GMAT score will be weighted more. Remember your GMAT and GPA are only 2 elements out of your whole application. Higher scores are always better, but work experience, references, essays and cover letters can be just as critical in getting into the school you want. Good GPA's and GMAT's wont trump irrelevant work experience, incoherent essays and poor references.

Hope this helps

Kelly

xeqtr · Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:33 am Post subject: Re: GMAT Score vs. Undergrad GPA

Depends on the schools I think, since some schools weigh GMAT scores more importantly, perhaps somes ask for a above a certain GPA, somes care about great leadership in WEs etc etc. But admissions would questions with such a good GPA why you scored a low GMAT. That's gonna be your basic problem imo.

vinviper1 · Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:40 am Post subject:

I would also thnk the type of undergrad matters much

jelt · Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 1:07 pm Post subject:

Hi,

I think a strong GMAT is important when you come from a UG where adcoms don't quite know what to make of the GPA you've gotten. That may include schools in the top 100, or even top 50, as opposed to top 10.

With a strong UG GPA, however, a strong GMAT is probably expected. Without that, they may question your commitment, your preparation, or worse, your intellect.

Finally a strong Masters GPA is not actually very helpful. I know a friend who got dinged from Wharton/Lauder although he had a 3.7 Masters GPA from Carnegie Mellon. The adcom staff specifically said his GPA was a red flag. And she meant his UG, not his Masters GPA. Obviously his masters GPA is very good, but somehow that doesn't carry much weight with them.

VP_MBA_Guru · Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 11:56 am Post subject:

Hi everyone,

I would agree with all said on the post.

First of all, GMAT and undergrad GPA are only a portion of the entire application. You could have stellar scores on your GMAT and GPA, but they might not have an impact if your essays, LORs or interviews is off. Esp these days, when there is so much competition to get into a top MBA program, you need to be perfect in every aspect of your application!

That said, I do agree that AdComs are mindful of the relationship between GMAT and GPA. For example, if you have a high GPA from a top undergraduate program, they might be more lenient to a relatively-lower GMAT score.

Regards,

NP