When a city experiences a sharp decline in population, the city's tax revenues, which pay for such city services as police protection and maintenance of water lines, also decrease. The area to be policed and the number and length of the water lines to be maintained, however, do not decrease. Attempting to make up the tax revenue lost by raising tax rates is not feasible, since higher tax rates would cause even more residents to leave.
The information given most strongly supports which of the following general claims?
(A) If, in a city with sharply declining population, police protection and water line maintenance do not deteriorate, some other service previously provided by the city will deteriorate or be eliminated.
(B) If a city's tax rates are held stable over a period of time, neither the population nor the levels of city services provided will tend to decline over that period.
(C) If a city's population declines sharply, police protection and water line maintenance are the services that deteriorate most immediately and most markedly.
(D) A city that suffers revenue losses because of a sharp decline in population can make up some of the lost tax revenue by raising tax rates, provided the city's tax rates are low in relation to those other cities.
(E) A city that is losing residents because tax rates are perceived as too high by those residents can reverse this population trend by bringing its tax rates down to a more moderate level.
GMAT Prep | When a city experiences a sharp decline in popul
This topic has expert replies
- richachampion
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 698
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2015 12:12 am
- Location: Noida, India
- Thanked: 32 times
- Followed by:26 members
- GMAT Score:740
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
- richachampion
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 698
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2015 12:12 am
- Location: Noida, India
- Thanked: 32 times
- Followed by:26 members
- GMAT Score:740
OA: A
I think we do not have a well defined conclusion in this question. what say experts?
Or this is the conclusion -
Attempting to make up the tax revenue lost by raising tax rates is not feasible
I will love to discuss Option B in detail as this option is testing a very powerful concept of causality.
I think we do not have a well defined conclusion in this question. what say experts?
Or this is the conclusion -
Attempting to make up the tax revenue lost by raising tax rates is not feasible
I will love to discuss Option B in detail as this option is testing a very powerful concept of causality.
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
The information given most strongly supports which of the following general claims?richachampion wrote:OA: A
I think we do not have a well defined conclusion in this question. what say experts?
Here, the passage must support the correct answer choice.
Implication:
The correct answer is an INFERENCE, a statement that must be true, given the information in the passage.
Generally, the passage for an inference CR will not have a conclusion.
This information is not a conclusion but a FACT.Or this is the conclusion -
Attempting to make up the tax revenue lost by raising tax rates is not feasible
One approach is to apply the NEGATION TEST.I will love to discuss Option B in detail as this option is testing a very powerful concept of causality.
When the correct answer choice is negated, the passage will be contradicted.
B, negated:
If a city's tax rates are held stable over a period of time, the population or the levels of city services provided will tend to decline over that period.
The passage offers no information about a city in which tax rates are held stable.
Since the negation of B does not contradict the passage, eliminate B.
A, negated:
If, in a city with sharply declining population, police protection and water line maintenance do not deteriorate, no other service previously provided by the city will deteriorate or be eliminated.
This negation contradicts the passage's contention that a city with a sharply declining population will have less tax revenue to pay for city services.
Since the negation of A contradicts the passage, A is the correct inference: the answer choice that MUST BE TRUE, given the information in the passage.
The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:5 members
Hi Verbal Experts(Ceilidh/Dave/Mitch/Marty/others),
Can you please shed some light on the following concerns:
1. Why C is wrong ?
2. Option D is wrong because it appears to CONTRADICT the PREMISE (Attempting to make up the tax revenue lost by raising tax rates is not feasible) in the ARGUMENT. A PREMISE is a undisputed FACT, so it can't be contradicted. Right ?
Can you please shed some light on the following concerns:
1. Why C is wrong ?
2. Option D is wrong because it appears to CONTRADICT the PREMISE (Attempting to make up the tax revenue lost by raising tax rates is not feasible) in the ARGUMENT. A PREMISE is a undisputed FACT, so it can't be contradicted. Right ?
Last edited by RBBmba@2014 on Mon Dec 26, 2016 10:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:5 members
Hi Verbal Experts,
Any thoughts on my above concerns ?
Look forward to hear from you! Much thanks in advance.
Any thoughts on my above concerns ?
Look forward to hear from you! Much thanks in advance.
- DavidG@VeritasPrep
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
- Location: Boston, MA
- Thanked: 1153 times
- Followed by:128 members
- GMAT Score:770
1) Imagine you're in charge of setting the budget for the city. You're told that because the city's population is down, tax revenue is down. You also know that the costs of police protection and water line maintenance are unchanged. So you know you have to cut spending somewhere, but it's hardly a forgone conclusion that the cuts will most profoundly impact police protection and water line maintenance. You could make cuts there. But you may also decide that those things are pretty important and that some other budget item is a lower priority and cut spending there.RBBmba@2014 wrote:Hi Verbal Experts(Ceilidh/Dave/Mitch/Marty/others),
Can you please shed some light on the following concerns:
1. Why C is wrong ?
2. Option D is wrong because it appears to CONTRADICT the PREMISE (Attempting to make up the tax revenue lost by raising tax rates is not feasible) in the ARGUMENT. A PREMISE is a undisputed FACT, so it can't be contradicted. Right ?
2) Correct.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:5 members
Hi Dave,DavidG@VeritasPrep wrote:1) Imagine you're in charge of setting the budget for the city. You're told that because the city's population is down, tax revenue is down. You also know that the costs of police protection and water line maintenance are unchanged. So you know you have to cut spending somewhere, but it's hardly a forgone conclusion that the cuts will most profoundly impact police protection and water line maintenance. You could make cuts there. But you may also decide that those things are pretty important and that some other budget item is a lower priority and cut spending there.RBBmba@2014 wrote: 1. Why C is wrong ?
I hear you here. Apart from what you've mentioned, I guess, the following could also be a potential reason to eliminate Option C:
"most immediately and most markedly" -- These phrases in C indicate some sort of EXTREMES. GENERALLY, such things should be considered INCORRECT in an INFERENCE CR because the OA of an INFERENCE CR is a MUST BE TRUE statement.
Am I correct ?
Last edited by RBBmba@2014 on Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
- DavidG@VeritasPrep
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
- Location: Boston, MA
- Thanked: 1153 times
- Followed by:128 members
- GMAT Score:770
I'd modify that statement a little bit. When you see extreme language in an answer choice for an inference question, it can be considered a reason to be skeptical of the answer, but it doesn't definitively rule the choice out. It's just a higher bar to clear. For example, if an answer choice claims that something is "always" true, and you suspect that it's merely true "most" of the time, that answer choice would be incorrect. But it's not inconceivable that some scenario would always be true, depending on the prompt.RBBmba@2014 wrote:Hi Dave,DavidG@VeritasPrep wrote:1) Imagine you're in charge of setting the budget for the city. You're told that because the city's population is down, tax revenue is down. You also know that the costs of police protection and water line maintenance are unchanged. So you know you have to cut spending somewhere, but it's hardly a forgone conclusion that the cuts will most profoundly impact police protection and water line maintenance. You could make cuts there. But you may also decide that those things are pretty important and that some other budget item is a lower priority and cut spending there.RBBmba@2014 wrote: 1. Why C is wrong ?
I hear you here. Apart from what you've mentioned, I guess, the following could also be a potential reason to eliminate Option C:
"most immediately and most markedly" -- These phrases in C indicate some sort of EXTREMES. Such things should be considered INCORRECT in an INFERENCE CR because the OA of an INFERENCE CR is a MUST BE TRUE statement.
Am I correct ?
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:5 members
Yes, of courseDavidG@VeritasPrep wrote:I'd modify that statement a little bit. When you see extreme language in an answer choice for an inference question, it can be considered a reason to be skeptical of the answer, but it doesn't definitively rule the choice out. It's just a higher bar to clear. For example, if an answer choice claims that something is "always" true, and you suspect that it's merely true "most" of the time, that answer choice would be incorrect. But it's not inconceivable that some scenario would always be true, depending on the prompt.
Well, I've tweaked my post a BIT with the insertion of "GENERALLY" - Now I think, it makes perfect sense ?
- DavidG@VeritasPrep
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
- Location: Boston, MA
- Thanked: 1153 times
- Followed by:128 members
- GMAT Score:770
Looks good to meRBBmba@2014 wrote:Yes, of courseDavidG@VeritasPrep wrote:I'd modify that statement a little bit. When you see extreme language in an answer choice for an inference question, it can be considered a reason to be skeptical of the answer, but it doesn't definitively rule the choice out. It's just a higher bar to clear. For example, if an answer choice claims that something is "always" true, and you suspect that it's merely true "most" of the time, that answer choice would be incorrect. But it's not inconceivable that some scenario would always be true, depending on the prompt.
Well, I've tweaked my post a BIT with the insertion of "GENERALLY" - Now I think, it makes perfect sense ?