gmat prep - weaken

[This topic has 3 expert replies and 10 member replies]
Free $100 Amazon.com Gift Card - Buy a GMAT course using a Beat The GMAT discount code between Mar 8-22 and get a $100 Amazon.com Gift Card. Learn more!
Post New Topic   Post Reply

okigbo
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!

Default Avatar

Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 177

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 5 times in 5 posts

Test Date: mar 2010
Target GMAT Score: 730

Topic: gmat prep - weaken
PostTue Nov 17, 2009 7:02 pm

Elapsed Time:
00:00
Lap   Why a timer is critical to improving your score

**I usually love weaken questions but had some trouble with this - can someone point me in the right direction?



Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. The decline in rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama, the first and only video rental outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also sold them cheaply.

Brad: There must be another explanation: as you yourself said, the decline was on the order of 10,000 rentals. Yet Videorama sold only 4,000 videos in 1994.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection that Brad presents to Jennifer's explanation?

(A) In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold.
(B) In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened in Centerville.
(C) Most of the video rental outlets in Centerville rent videos at a discount on certain nights of the week.
(D) People often buy videos of movies that they have previously seen in a theater.
(E) People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
heshamelaziry
GMAT Destroyer!

Default Avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2009
Posts: 869

Thanks given: 61
Thanked 7 times in 6 posts
Location: California

Target GMAT Score: 600

PostTue Nov 17, 2009 7:42 pm

IMO C
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gmatv09
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!

Default Avatar

Joined: 10 Aug 2009
Posts: 256

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 3 times in 3 posts

Target GMAT Score: 740+

PostTue Nov 17, 2009 8:10 pm

IMO E
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
okigbo
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!

Default Avatar

Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 177

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 5 times in 5 posts

Test Date: mar 2010
Target GMAT Score: 730

PostTue Nov 17, 2009 10:21 pm

Noone learns anything with just answer choices... pls post reasoning for rejecting / accepting choices. thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
f2006198
Just gettin' started!

Default Avatar

Joined: 17 Nov 2009
Posts: 6

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: India

Target GMAT Score: 760+

PostTue Nov 17, 2009 11:18 pm

IMO E

Brad's main argument is that there will have to be another reason (apart from the sales of video's by Videorama) for the decline in video rentals. E weakens the argument by pointing out that the sale of 4000 video's is a direct aftereffect of the video's being sold by videorama and hence drop in rentals can be completely accounted for by the video sales by Videorama.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DeepakYakkundi
Just gettin' started!

Default Avatar

Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 21

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

PostWed Nov 18, 2009 4:32 am

(E) appears to be correct for the reasons explained above. but (a) is also attractive ans. While Brad's arguement involves only one aspect i.e. sale, he misses to consider the effect of renting videos which (a) brings out.

okigbo, please post the answer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Reply from Top Beat The GMAT Member
gmatmachoman
GMAT Titan

Default Avatar Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 1082

Thanks given: 79
Thanked 40 times in 37 posts

PostWed Nov 18, 2009 5:02 am

IMO E.

The opening statement says : Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993.

Here Video rental on the whole forms the universal set in which Videorama is also included.When the number of videos rented for 1994 was calculated , they have also conted the number of videos rented by Videorama. So pointing out that Videorama renting out more videos than it sold makes the logic fall apart.

Whereas E gives an alternate cause for the effect.

_________________
Helen of Sparta: Don't be here.
Prince of Troy(Paris): This is what u said Last Night!!
Helen: last Night was a Mistake.
Prince:What about the other day
Helen: I made many mistakes last week.!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
okigbo
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!

Default Avatar

Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 177

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 5 times in 5 posts

Test Date: mar 2010
Target GMAT Score: 730

PostThu Nov 19, 2009 5:05 pm

I see why E is the final answer but can't come up with why A is not. Can anyone help me out?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Reply from GMAT/MBA Admissions Expert
Testluv
GMAT Instructor

Default Avatar Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Posts: 754

Thanks given: 3
Thanked 174 times in 155 posts
Location: Toronto

GMAT Score: 800

PostFri Nov 20, 2009 2:12 am

okigbo wrote:
I see why E is the final answer but can't come up with why A is not. Can anyone help me out?
Many strengthen/weaken questions can be viewed as cause and effect or explain the phenomenon arguments:

The phenomenon (effect): Centerville's video rentals declined by 10,000.

Jennifer's explanation (cause): The opening of Videorama. The heart of Jennifer's explanation is that Videorama sells videos cheaply. This is the substance or main evidence for her conclusion that it was Videorama's opening that caused the phenomenon.

Brad's objection: There must be some other explanation because Videorama only sold 4000. So Brad's objection centers on how Videorama's selling of videos can't have been a sufficient explanation (for Centerville's decline in number of videos rented out.)

The question stem instructs us to weaken the force of Brad's objection. Choice E succeeds because it suggests that Videorama's selling of videos may well be a sufficient explanation for the phenomenon (the decline in the number of videos rented out by Centerville).

Choice A does strengthen the general idea that Centerville's decline was due to Videorama enticing away customers. BUT it suggests that Videorama did this more by renting out rather than by selling videos. Therefore, Brad's objection still stands.

_________________
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thanked by: heshamelaziry
qms999
Just gettin' started!

Default Avatar

Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 1

Thanks given: 1
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

Test Date: 11/28/09
Target GMAT Score: 700

PostSat Nov 21, 2009 1:15 pm

A is incorrect because, the number rented could even be 4001. IMO E
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Reply from GMAT/MBA Admissions Expert
Testluv
GMAT Instructor

Default Avatar Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Posts: 754

Thanks given: 3
Thanked 174 times in 155 posts
Location: Toronto

GMAT Score: 800

PostSat Nov 21, 2009 2:12 pm

qms999 wrote:
A is incorrect because, the number rented could even be 4001. IMO E
Actually, this is not the reason choice A is incorrect. Even if the number rented out was 10,000, it still fails to remove the force of Brad's objection against Jennifer's explanation. This is because, Jennifer's explanation for Centerville's decline in number of videos rented out is that Videorama is SELLING videos. Brad's objection provides reasoning for why Videorama's selling of videos does not account for the drop in the number of videos rented out by Centerville. (As discussed in my post above).
_________________
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gmasterbater
Just gettin' started!



Joined: 21 Nov 2009
Posts: 3

Thanks given: 1
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

Test Date: 12.12.09
Target GMAT Score: 740

PostSat Nov 21, 2009 11:32 pm

Before evening going to the answer choices, I was thinking how can video sales decrease video rentals? I was thinking that if someone owns a copy they would not rent it again. 10,000 rentals could be 10,000 different rentals or some combination of multiple rentals (ex: 5000 movies rented twice). With the pre-phrase in mind, I went to the answer choice and found that choice E follows this line of reasoning and therefore weakening Brad's argument. Bingo!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Reply from GMAT/MBA Admissions Expert
Testluv
GMAT Instructor

Default Avatar Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Posts: 754

Thanks given: 3
Thanked 174 times in 155 posts
Location: Toronto

GMAT Score: 800

PostSun Nov 22, 2009 9:36 am

gmasterbater wrote:
Before evening going to the answer choices, I was thinking how can video sales decrease video rentals? I was thinking that if someone owns a copy they would not rent it again. 10,000 rentals could be 10,000 different rentals or some combination of multiple rentals (ex: 5000 movies rented twice). With the pre-phrase in mind, I went to the answer choice and found that choice E follows this line of reasoning and therefore weakening Brad's argument. Bingo!
Fantastic approach! It is always better to generate a prediction and aggressively scan for a match than it is to go into the answer choices blind.
_________________
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
munaf
Just gettin' started!

Default Avatar

Joined: 16 Nov 2009
Posts: 23

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

PostMon Nov 23, 2009 6:57 am

But we have to weaken Brads argument.so A seems correct.Isnt E strengthning Brads reply.?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post New Topic   Post Reply All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1
 
Most Active Members in Last 30 Days
1. harsh.champ 624 posts
2. shashank.ism 481 posts
3. ajith 383 posts
4. money9111 372 posts
5. thephoenix 364 posts
Most Active Experts in Last 30 Days
1. lunarpower
Manhattan GMAT Teacher
82 posts
2. Stuart Kovinsky
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
76 posts
3. Testluv
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
48 posts
4. Lisa Anderson
Stacy Blackman Consulting
44 posts
5. Bryant@VeritasPrep
Veritas Prep
37 posts