Welcome! Check out our free B-School Guides to learn how you compare with other applicants.
Login or Register
 

GMAT PREP TOUGH SC

This topic has 5 expert replies and 26 member replies
Goto page Previous
vishal.pathak Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
Joined
22 Sep 2011
Posted:
176 messages
Thanked:
5 times
Post Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:54 am
amit.trivedi@ymail.com wrote:
I think egmat and the GMatguru have already given a wonderful explanation. You could always see them and get your doubts cleared.

Intended i got it wrong as i thought 'intended' modified the mutual funds which was wrong.

Intended modifies portfolios and thats the correct usage.

option A is wrong. 'With the intention to' might be correct in regular English but I do not think that this is correct in Gmat....
Ok. Quick question. Does your post help anyone??

If i'm posting this question in the thread in which experts have replied then doesn't it mean that I have a doubt in it? Is it really difficult to understand this? Have I not made it clear that I have a doubt? Have I not repeated my doubt a number of times to present what I mean? Is your reply an answer to that?

Are people in this forum interested in listening to your views? Have you quoted an established law to support your belief? Have you quoted some expert's comment to support your belief?

What have you achieved by your post above???

Think, please think

Regards,
Vishal

Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!

GMAT/MBA Expert

Post Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:06 pm
vishal.pathak wrote:
vikram4689 wrote:
Quote:
In this question the noun before verb-ed modifier (intended) is funds. Now funds itself is a part of a different modifier. We are ignoring this modifier. Does it mean that verb-ed modifier can never modify a noun in another modifier and should always modify either the subject or object of the clause
.
Verbed modifier would modify noun before modifier because preceding modifier is a NON-ESSENTIAL modifier and hence sentence should make sense even when the modifier is removed.
It is clear that the modifier is non essential and removing it will not have any effect on the MEANING of the sentence. The question here is, what prevents 'intended' to modify funds. Is there an exception to the touch rule?
We need to use some common sense. Here is the OA:

Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of mutual funds, intended to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets.

If intended modifies funds, then we have one non-essential modifier (intended to turn in good results) modifying ANOTHER non-essential modifier (often in the form of mutual funds). The implication is that the remainder of the sentence -- all on its own -- conveys the essential meaning of the sentence. Omitting the modifiers, we get:

Asset allocators create portfolios.

This sentence feels incomplete; it doesn't convey sufficient meaning for a GMAT SC. It should be clear that the point of the sentence is to tell us WHAT KIND of portfolios are created by asset allocators:

Asset allocators create portfolios intended turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear markets.

This sentence feels complete and conveys the intended meaning. Hence, we know that intended to turn in good results is an ESSENTIAL modifier describing the PORTFOLIOS.

_________________
Mitch Hunt
GMAT Private Tutor and Instructor
GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
Contact me about long distance tutoring!

Thanked by: sui generis
Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.

Best Conversation Starters

1 varun289 34 topics
2 killerdrummer 22 topics
3 sana.noor 21 topics
4 guerrero 14 topics
5 sanaa.rizwan 14 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

Most Active Experts

1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

200 posts
2 image description GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

135 posts
3 image description Jim@StratusPrep

Stratus Prep

106 posts
4 image description Anju@Gurome

Gurome

56 posts
5 image description Jon@Admissionado

Admissionado

44 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts