| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
msd_2008 Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 29 Jun 2008 Posts: 34
Thanks given: 2 Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
Location: India
|
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 11:42 pm Post subject: Gmat Prep question 2 |
|
|
Q. In the xy plane, what is the y intercept of Line L
1. The slope of line L is 3 times its y intercept
2. the x intercept of line L is -1/3 _________________ When the going gets tough, the tough gets going. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
pepeprepa GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 08 Jul 2008 Posts: 660
Thanks given: 10 Thanked 43 times in 41 posts
Location: France
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Would say E. Is it the answer? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Canman Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 11 Jul 2008 Posts: 58
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 4 times in 4 posts
Test Date: 8/16/2008 Target GMAT Score: 730+
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it is E
1) Y=3m(x)+m - doesn't allow us to conclude one value for m. - INSUFFICIENT
2) no slope given - INSUFFICIENT
Together statement 2) doesn't provide incremental information (see below) to statement 1, still insufficient.
If we look for X intercept using just statement 1) we find:
0=3mx+m
x=-1/3
So no new information with statement 2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wilderness Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 15 Mar 2008 Posts: 102
Thanks given: 23 Thanked 4 times in 4 posts
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What if we were given explicity that the slope is positive (or that its negative)
Would that be of any help ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Canman Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 11 Jul 2008 Posts: 58
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 4 times in 4 posts
Test Date: 8/16/2008 Target GMAT Score: 730+
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think knowing just the sign alone would help. If I understand the problem correctly we need the direction and the magnitude to help us extrapolate the Y intercept based on the information provided in statement 1.
As for statement 2, knowing the direction alone still provides an infinite number of possibilities for lines that we can draw from an x-intercept of -1/3. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
microke Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 19 Jun 2008 Posts: 31
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: Pune, India Target GMAT Score: 720
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think the answer is C...
From statement 1 y=3m(x)+m
From statement 2 x=-1/3
So y=-m+m =o; hence y=0 means it is the x axis itself....x axis has got a slope of zero...Hence answer C |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pepeprepa GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 08 Jul 2008 Posts: 660
Thanks given: 10 Thanked 43 times in 41 posts
Location: France
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| There is an infinity of lines. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Canman Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 11 Jul 2008 Posts: 58
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 4 times in 4 posts
Test Date: 8/16/2008 Target GMAT Score: 730+
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 3:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Microke-
I don't think x=-1/3 and x-intercept = -1/3 are equivalent statements. So I'm not clear on the substitution. Am I wrong on this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
microke Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 19 Jun 2008 Posts: 31
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: Pune, India Target GMAT Score: 720
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 3:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Canman, I think one can assume x intercept as the point crossing x axis , that is at x=-1/3 when the assumed straight line is of form y=mx+c... I am also not so confident, what is the OA? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|