Welcome! Check out our free B-School Guides to learn how you compare with other applicants.
Login or Register
 

GMAT CR

This topic has 1 expert reply and 11 member replies
abhi75 Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
Joined
16 Oct 2007
Posted:
105 messages
Thanked:
3 times
GMAT CR Post Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:56 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    The spacing of the four holes on a fragment of a bone flute excavated at a Neanderthal campsite is just what is required to play the third through sixth notes of the diatonic scale-the seven-note musical scale used in much of Western music since the Renaissance. Musicologists therefore hypothesize that the diatonic musical scale was developed and used thousands of years before it was adopted by Western musicians.

    Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the hypothesis?

    A. Bone flutes were probably the only musical instrument made by Neanderthals.
    B. No musical instrument that is known to have used a diatomic scale is of an earlier date than the flute found at the Neanderthal campsite.
    C. The flute was made from a cave-bear bone and the campsite at which the flute fragment was excavated was in a cave that also contained skeletal remains of cave bears.
    D. Flutes are the simplest wind instrument that can be constructed to allow playing a diatonic scale.
    E. The cave-bear leg bone used to make the Neanderthal flute would have been long enough to make a flute capable of playing a complete diatonic scale.


    Can someone please explain this. Stuart, I would really appreciate your help in explaining this one.

    Thanks.
    Abhi

    Thanked by: vinitha, rahulvsd
    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    arorag GMAT Destroyer! Default Avatar
    Joined
    21 Jan 2008
    Posted:
    344 messages
    Thanked:
    4 times
    Post Sun Apr 27, 2008 6:34 pm
    only B is supporting the argument

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Stuart Kovinsky GMAT Instructor
    Joined
    08 Jan 2008
    Posted:
    3156 messages
    Followed by:
    460 members
    Thanked:
    1432 times
    GMAT Score:
    800
    Post Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:47 pm
    abhi75 wrote:
    The spacing of the four holes on a fragment of a bone flute excavated at a Neanderthal campsite is just what is required to play the third through sixth notes of the diatonic scale-the seven-note musical scale used in much of Western music since the Renaissance. Musicologists therefore hypothesize that the diatonic musical scale was developed and used thousands of years before it was adopted by Western musicians.

    Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the hypothesis?

    A. Bone flutes were probably the only musical instrument made by Neanderthals.
    B. No musical instrument that is known to have used a diatomic scale is of an earlier date than the flute found at the Neanderthal campsite.
    C. The flute was made from a cave-bear bone and the campsite at which the flute fragment was excavated was in a cave that also contained skeletal remains of cave bears.
    D. Flutes are the simplest wind instrument that can be constructed to allow playing a diatonic scale.
    E. The cave-bear leg bone used to make the Neanderthal flute would have been long enough to make a flute capable of playing a complete diatonic scale.


    Can someone please explain this. Stuart, I would really appreciate your help in explaining this one.

    Thanks.
    Abhi
    We can summarize the argument as follows:

    Flute fragment found with 4 notes of the diatonic scale. Therefore, creators of flute knew about and used the diatonic scale.

    In order to reach that conclusion, the author has to assume that the 4 notes on the fragment aren't just coincidentally on the diatonic scale.

    Our prediction for a strengthener: some actual evidence that it's not just a coincidence OR something that allows us to extrapolate more info from the 4 notes on the fragment.

    Only choice (e) gives us useful information. If we know that the flute could have contained the entire scale, that's more evidence that the creators knew about and used the scale.

    This is a great situation to use Kaplan's denial test. Let's look at the opposite of (e):

    Quote:
    It is NOT true that the cave-bear leg bone used to make the Neanderthal flute would have been long enough to make a flute capable of playing a complete diatonic scale.
    Well, if the flute couldn't have been long enough to encompass the entire scale, then we're very skeptical that the neanderthals were actually using the scale. In other words, the opposite of (e) casts doubt on the conclusion: therefore, (e) itself must be a strengthener.

    It's important to remember that strengthening isn't the same as proving. (E) certainly doesn't prove that neanderthals used the scale, it just makes that conclusion more believable.

    _________________
    Stuart Kovinsky, B.A. LL.B.
    Kaplan Test Prep & Admissions
    Toronto Office
    1-800-KAP-TEST
    www.kaptest.com

    Learn more about me

    Thanked by: mmslf75
    Free GMAT Practice Test under Proctored Conditions! - Find a practice test near you or live and online in Kaplan's Classroom Anywhere environment. Register today!
    abhi75 Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
    Joined
    16 Oct 2007
    Posted:
    105 messages
    Thanked:
    3 times
    Post Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:06 pm
    Hi Stuart,

    Thanks for your great explanation. The OA is definitely E. I am always off on these kind of questions. Need to practice more!

    -abhi

    chidcguy GMAT Destroyer! Default Avatar
    Joined
    12 Feb 2007
    Posted:
    438 messages
    Thanked:
    22 times
    Post Sun May 11, 2008 9:50 am
    I went with C as I needed to link the N's and the cave bone used in the flute. C says that the cave bone was used to make the flute and the campsite at which flute was excavated also contained skeletal remains of cave bears.

    C linked them, How ever E is a better answer as it not only says that the flute is made of cave bear leg bone, but also long enough which supports the used and developed part in the original stimulus.

    bvn Rising GMAT Star
    Joined
    08 Mar 2009
    Posted:
    63 messages
    Test Date:
    Nov 2009
    Target GMAT Score:
    750
    Post Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:50 am
    Thank you very much Stuart. Your explanation gives me another weapon to fight this freaking question

    rahul.s GMAT Destroyer! Default Avatar
    Joined
    24 Dec 2009
    Posted:
    324 messages
    Thanked:
    17 times
    Post Sun Jan 10, 2010 4:33 am
    Excellent explanation Stuart. Thank you Smile

    gilliamwibson Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
    Joined
    18 Jan 2010
    Posted:
    10 messages
    Post Mon Mar 01, 2010 5:32 am
    thanks Stuart!!! again

    atulmangal GMAT Titan Default Avatar
    Joined
    26 Feb 2011
    Posted:
    1112 messages
    Followed by:
    47 members
    Thanked:
    71 times
    Post Sat Jun 04, 2011 8:23 am
    gilliamwibson wrote:
    thanks Stuart!!! again
    Nice question and nice explanation

    cans GMAT Titan
    Joined
    04 Apr 2011
    Posted:
    1308 messages
    Followed by:
    111 members
    Thanked:
    297 times
    Test Date:
    13th Oct
    Target GMAT Score:
    750+
    GMAT Score:
    750
    Post Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:40 pm
    Nice question Smile

    _________________
    If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button Wink

    Cans!!

    kapoor.divs Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
    Joined
    14 Aug 2010
    Posted:
    7 messages
    Post Fri Jul 22, 2011 5:57 am
    Hi Stuart,


    Can you please explain why B is wrong and how to approach strongly support type of questions in general.

    CR is a weak area for me Sad

    Thanks!

    Regards,
    Divya

    hbhardwaj Just gettin' started!
    Joined
    05 Apr 2011
    Posted:
    11 messages
    Thanked:
    1 times
    Post Sat Jul 23, 2011 11:53 am
    Yeah, Even I don't know why B is incorrect....

    Please explain

    pinchharmonic Rising GMAT Star Default Avatar
    Joined
    03 Aug 2011
    Posted:
    51 messages
    Thanked:
    2 times
    Post Thu Mar 15, 2012 7:32 pm
    answer choice B seems to eliminate the doubt that there was an even earlier discovery / usage of the diatonic scale since no instrument was found to be dated earlier. but that only strengthens the conclusion "the diatonic scale was NOT discovered tens of thousands of years ago"

    that really doesn't help the conclusion of it being discovered thousands of years ago


    answer choice C is strange because if the bone was long enough to play the entire scale then why didn't the neandrathals have all the holes, if they can drill 4 why not the rest? the conclusion was they discovered the entire scale. not just 4 of the notes.

    when you negate it and the bone was NOT long enough for the 7 holes for the 7 notes. then that gives an explanation for why they didn't have the 7 holes, they only have the 4 holes that fit. i don't think we can assume music knowledge that a lot of scales share the same notes. wouldn't a more reasonable assumption be, if a scale is different, it shares no notes with any other scale?

    any clarification would be much appreciated!

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 varun289 43 topics
    2 greenwich 30 topics
    3 sana.noor 21 topics
    4 guerrero 20 topics
    5 killerdrummer 19 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    202 posts
    2 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    143 posts
    3 image description Anju@Gurome

    Gurome

    134 posts
    4 image description Jim@StratusPrep

    Stratus Prep

    86 posts
    5 image description David@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    41 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts