Children who watch a great deal of television (and their families have
a history of near-sightedness) will probably require glasses sooner
than their peers who are not predisposed to myopia in these ways
1.
2. whose families have a history of near-sightedness
3. and a history of near-sightedness runs in the family
4. whose families have a history of near-sightedness running in them
5. with a history of near-sightedness running in the family
Glasses - Kaplan
This topic has expert replies
interesting,
to make it parallel I was looking for an 'and' before 2.
However, i don't think 1,2 and 4 can make the sentence parallel.
so I was between 3 and 5.
3 I discarded because I was looking for a 'have'
and have a history of....
anyways what is the QA?
to make it parallel I was looking for an 'and' before 2.
However, i don't think 1,2 and 4 can make the sentence parallel.
so I was between 3 and 5.
3 I discarded because I was looking for a 'have'
and have a history of....
anyways what is the QA?
so the sentence would be ..
Children who watch a great deal of television whose families have a history of near-sightedness will probably require glasses sooner
than their peers who are not predisposed to myopia in these ways
Are you sure you typed it correct? with comma and everything.
The above sentence doesn't sound right to me.
Children who watch a great deal of television whose families have a history of near-sightedness will probably require glasses sooner
than their peers who are not predisposed to myopia in these ways
Are you sure you typed it correct? with comma and everything.
The above sentence doesn't sound right to me.