• Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep

Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced c

This topic has 1 expert reply and 1 member reply

Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced c

Post Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:13 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Gambling experts contend that with a sufficiently advanced computer technology, a skilled technician will soon be able to win almost every time he or she bets on horse racing. Yet such a claim could never be evaluated, for losses would simply be blamed on immature technology or the technician's lack of proficiency.

    Which of the following, if true, would be most useful as a basis for arguing against the author's claim that the gambling experts' contention cannot be evaluated?

    A. Some technicians using advanced computers have been able to gamble successfully more than half the time.
    B. Gambling experts readily admit that it is not yet possible to produce the necessary computer equipment.
    C. There is a direct correlation between the sophistication of computer technology available to a programmer and the gambling success he or she achieves with it.
    D. Certain rare configurations of computer data can serve as a basis for precise gambling predictions.
    E. Even without computer assistance, skilled gamblers can make a steady living from gambling.

    What is wrong with Option D?

    OA C

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    Post Fri Nov 10, 2017 6:42 am
    I think option B can be correct.

    Experts, may you clarify us this CR question?

    Thanked by: lheiannie07
    Post Fri Nov 10, 2017 6:59 am
    The conclusion: The gambling experts' contention -- with a sufficiently advanced computer technology, a skilled technician will soon be able to win almost every time -- cannot be evaluated
    The evidence: Losses would simply be blamed on immature technology or the technician's lack of proficiency.

    The question asks you to weaken the conclusion. Choice C states that there is a direct correlation between the sophistication of computer technology and gambling success. The more sophisticated the tech, the greater the success. This does indicate that if the tech was sufficiently advanced, the outcome would be successful (nearly) every time. This would weaken the conclusion.

    Choice B and D were asked about.

    Choice B implies that the tech is not sophisticated enough, but the argument is about what WILL happen when it is. This statement does not weaken the argument, which is about the future.

    Choice D mentions, somewhat vaguely, "rare configurations of computer data" that can make precise gambling predictions. Are these configurations dependent on sophisticated technology? Will they be less rare in the future? Remember, the conclusion mentions winning "almost every time." It's unclear how this statement affects the conclusion.

    I'm available for further questions.

    _________________
    GMAT Prep From The Economist
    We offer 70+ point score improvement money back guarantee.
    Our average student improves 98 points.

    Thanked by: lheiannie07
    Free 7-Day Test Prep with Economist GMAT Tutor - Receive free access to the top-rated GMAT prep course including a 1-on-1 strategy session, 2 full-length tests, and 5 ask-a-tutor messages. Get started now.

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 LUANDATO 127 topics
    2 lheiannie07 87 topics
    3 Roland2rule 79 topics
    4 AAPL 78 topics
    5 swerve 70 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    162 posts
    2 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    121 posts
    3 image description Jay@ManhattanReview

    Manhattan Review

    121 posts
    4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    120 posts
    5 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    116 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts