For the integers m, n, r, and s

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 468
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:20 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:4 members

For the integers m, n, r, and s

by vipulgoyal » Fri Mar 13, 2015 1:57 am
For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m - r) > (s - n)?
(1) 250 > r + s
(2) m + r + s= 375

OE says the Qstem is asking
IS(m - r) > (s - n)
=
(m + n) > (r + s)
my query :- from stem we only get m is positive , or has minimum value 126 , we dont know the signs of n,r,and s , so how can these variables can be moved ether side without changing inequality(unless it would have given n, a and s are positive

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2663
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
Location: Boston, MA
Thanked: 1153 times
Followed by:128 members
GMAT Score:770

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Fri Mar 13, 2015 3:44 am
We only have to worry about the possibility that the inequality sign will flip when we're multiplying or dividing both sides of the inequality, not when adding or subtracting.

In this case, m- r > s -n is rewritten as m + n > s + r by adding r and n to both sides. Because we're only adding, not multiplying or dividing, we don't have to worry about the possibility of the inequality sign flipping.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Mar 13, 2015 9:11 am
For the integers m, n, r, and s, if m + n = 250 and m > n, is (m - r) > (s - n)?
1) 250 > r + s
2) m + r + s = 375
Target question: Is (m - r) > (s - n)?

This is a great candidate for rephrasing the target question. We have a free video on this: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... cy?id=1100

If we take the inequality in the target question and add r and n to both sides, we get . . .
REPHRASED target question: Is (m + n) > (s + r)?

Since m + n = 250, we can also rephrase it this way . . .
REPHRASED target question: Is 250 > (s + r)?

Given Information: m + n = 250 and m > n
If m and n were EQUAL, then m and n would both equal 125
Since m is GREATER THAN n, we can conclude that m > 125

Statement 1: 250 > r + s
Perfect!
One of our REPHRASED target questions is Is 250 > (s + r)?
Since statement 1 allows us to answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, it is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: m + r + s = 375
Earlier (in the Given Information part of the solution), we determined that m > 125
So, we can reword statement 2 as: (a number bigger than 125) + (r + s) = 375
This means that (r + s) must be LESS THAN 250
In other words, 250 > (s + r)
One of our REPHRASED target questions is Is 250 > (s + r)?
Since statement 2 allows us to answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, it is SUFFICIENT

Answer = D

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image