• Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep

Footwear

This topic has 1 expert reply and 2 member replies
j_shreyans Legendary Member Default Avatar
Joined
07 Aug 2014
Posted:
510 messages
Followed by:
5 members
Upvotes:
3

Footwear

Post Tue Sep 30, 2014 1:59 am
Footwear designer John de los Santos last year released several limited editions of his best-known model of sneaker in exotic colors and prints. Although the new releases were priced substantially higher than their counterparts in more traditional colors, they sold out within a week of their release, and have since been selling on the resale market for up to four times the original price. The cost of producing the sneakers in exotic prints is no greater than that of producing them in more traditional colors, so de los Santos could earn a higher profit per unit by producing a greater percentage of his sneakers in such prints.

Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?

A)The designers who compete most directly with de los Santos will not produce similar lines of limited-edition sneakers in the near future.

B)Consumers' willingness to pay higher prices for the exotic sneakers was not influenced by the relative scarcity of those sneakers.

C)De los Santos's customer base is not shifting in the direction of younger consumers who prefer bolder styles.

D)De los Santos's sneakers are not priced substantially higher than those of the designers who compete most directly with him.

E)The workmanship of de los Santos's sneakers is of such high quality that it is impossible for lower-budget shoemakers to produce counterfeit versions of them.

Can you guys pls help me with negation technique.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Post Tue Sep 12, 2017 6:02 am
I also prefer Letter "B"

I was a little bit confused why not D? Anyone can explain?

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
j_shreyans Legendary Member Default Avatar
Joined
07 Aug 2014
Posted:
510 messages
Followed by:
5 members
Upvotes:
3
Post Tue Sep 30, 2014 8:49 pm
Hi David ,

Thanks a lot for your explaination , helps me a lot.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

GMAT/MBA Expert

David@VeritasPrep GMAT Instructor
Joined
22 Feb 2010
Posted:
2193 messages
Followed by:
508 members
Upvotes:
1186
GMAT Score:
770
Post Tue Sep 30, 2014 6:39 am
Quote:
Can you guys pls help me with negation technique.
Sure!

The evidence is that the exotic prints are not more expensive to make and that they sold at a much higher price and their seems to be strong demand for these exotic prints.

The conclusion is "de los Santos could earn a higher profit per unit by producing a greater percentage of his sneakers in such prints."



Let's negate each answer and the correct answer is the one that directly weakens the conclusion. So the answer that - when negated - challenges the idea that de los Santos can make more profit by selling more exotic prints.

To negate you first negate any quantifier (some, all, none, etc.) So if the answer says "all" you change it to "not all."

If there is no quantifier then you negate the main verb. So that "did sell" becomes "did NOT sell."

Ready? Here we go.

A)The designers who compete most directly with de los Santos will not produce similar lines of limited-edition sneakers in the near future.

Take out the "not" and the answer becomes "The designers who compete most directly with de los Santos will produce similar lines of limited-edition sneakers in the near future. What if they do? Does this mean that de los Santos should not produce more of his exotic prints? This is not the correct answer.


B)Consumers' willingness to pay higher prices for the exotic sneakers was not influenced by the relative scarcity of those sneakers.

Again, take out the "not" and you get "Consumers' willingness to pay higher prices for the exotic sneakers was influenced by the relative scarcity of those sneakers. This directly contradicts the conclusion, since the shoes will not be as scarce and this means consumers will not pay as much for them. This is the correct answer.

C)De los Santos's customer base is not shifting in the direction of younger consumers who prefer bolder styles.

Again remove the word "not" and you get "De los Santos's customer base is shifting in the direction of younger consumers who prefer bolder styles. So what if the base is shifting to younger consumers who prefer bolder styles? This might strengthen the conclusion and that is not what we want.

D)De los Santos's sneakers are not priced substantially higher than those of the designers who compete most directly with him.

Remove "not" and you get "De los Santos's sneakers are priced substantially higher than those of the designers who compete most directly with him." What if they are priced higher? People have shown that they are willing to pay so this does not harm the conclusion.

E)The workmanship of de los Santos's sneakers is NOT of such high quality that it is impossible for lower-budget shoemakers to produce counterfeit versions of them.

In this case we add the word "not." Again this is not the correct answer because producing counterfeit versions is not directly related to the profits on these exotic shoes.

_________________
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!

Best Conversation Starters

1 Roland2rule 146 topics
2 lheiannie07 110 topics
3 ardz24 56 topics
4 LUANDATO 52 topics
5 swerve 49 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

Most Active Experts

1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

153 posts
2 image description GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

129 posts
3 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

129 posts
4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

111 posts
5 image description EconomistGMATTutor

The Economist GMAT Tutor

79 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts