• Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep

Footwear

This topic has 1 expert reply and 2 member replies
j_shreyans Legendary Member Default Avatar
Joined
07 Aug 2014
Posted:
510 messages
Followed by:
5 members
Thanked:
3 times

Footwear

Post Tue Sep 30, 2014 1:59 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Footwear designer John de los Santos last year released several limited editions of his best-known model of sneaker in exotic colors and prints. Although the new releases were priced substantially higher than their counterparts in more traditional colors, they sold out within a week of their release, and have since been selling on the resale market for up to four times the original price. The cost of producing the sneakers in exotic prints is no greater than that of producing them in more traditional colors, so de los Santos could earn a higher profit per unit by producing a greater percentage of his sneakers in such prints.

    Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?

    A)The designers who compete most directly with de los Santos will not produce similar lines of limited-edition sneakers in the near future.

    B)Consumers' willingness to pay higher prices for the exotic sneakers was not influenced by the relative scarcity of those sneakers.

    C)De los Santos's customer base is not shifting in the direction of younger consumers who prefer bolder styles.

    D)De los Santos's sneakers are not priced substantially higher than those of the designers who compete most directly with him.

    E)The workmanship of de los Santos's sneakers is of such high quality that it is impossible for lower-budget shoemakers to produce counterfeit versions of them.

    Can you guys pls help me with negation technique.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    David@VeritasPrep GMAT Instructor
    Joined
    22 Feb 2010
    Posted:
    2193 messages
    Followed by:
    507 members
    Thanked:
    1186 times
    GMAT Score:
    770
    Post Tue Sep 30, 2014 6:39 am
    Quote:
    Can you guys pls help me with negation technique.
    Sure!

    The evidence is that the exotic prints are not more expensive to make and that they sold at a much higher price and their seems to be strong demand for these exotic prints.

    The conclusion is "de los Santos could earn a higher profit per unit by producing a greater percentage of his sneakers in such prints."



    Let's negate each answer and the correct answer is the one that directly weakens the conclusion. So the answer that - when negated - challenges the idea that de los Santos can make more profit by selling more exotic prints.

    To negate you first negate any quantifier (some, all, none, etc.) So if the answer says "all" you change it to "not all."

    If there is no quantifier then you negate the main verb. So that "did sell" becomes "did NOT sell."

    Ready? Here we go.

    A)The designers who compete most directly with de los Santos will not produce similar lines of limited-edition sneakers in the near future.

    Take out the "not" and the answer becomes "The designers who compete most directly with de los Santos will produce similar lines of limited-edition sneakers in the near future. What if they do? Does this mean that de los Santos should not produce more of his exotic prints? This is not the correct answer.


    B)Consumers' willingness to pay higher prices for the exotic sneakers was not influenced by the relative scarcity of those sneakers.

    Again, take out the "not" and you get "Consumers' willingness to pay higher prices for the exotic sneakers was influenced by the relative scarcity of those sneakers. This directly contradicts the conclusion, since the shoes will not be as scarce and this means consumers will not pay as much for them. This is the correct answer.

    C)De los Santos's customer base is not shifting in the direction of younger consumers who prefer bolder styles.

    Again remove the word "not" and you get "De los Santos's customer base is shifting in the direction of younger consumers who prefer bolder styles. So what if the base is shifting to younger consumers who prefer bolder styles? This might strengthen the conclusion and that is not what we want.

    D)De los Santos's sneakers are not priced substantially higher than those of the designers who compete most directly with him.

    Remove "not" and you get "De los Santos's sneakers are priced substantially higher than those of the designers who compete most directly with him." What if they are priced higher? People have shown that they are willing to pay so this does not harm the conclusion.

    E)The workmanship of de los Santos's sneakers is NOT of such high quality that it is impossible for lower-budget shoemakers to produce counterfeit versions of them.

    In this case we add the word "not." Again this is not the correct answer because producing counterfeit versions is not directly related to the profits on these exotic shoes.

    _________________
    Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

    Veritas Prep Reviews
    Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

    Thanked by: j_shreyans
    Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!
    j_shreyans Legendary Member Default Avatar
    Joined
    07 Aug 2014
    Posted:
    510 messages
    Followed by:
    5 members
    Thanked:
    3 times
    Post Tue Sep 30, 2014 8:49 pm
    Hi David ,

    Thanks a lot for your explaination , helps me a lot.

    Post Tue Sep 12, 2017 6:02 am
    I also prefer Letter "B"

    I was a little bit confused why not D? Anyone can explain?

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 152 topics
    2 lheiannie07 61 topics
    3 Roland2rule 49 topics
    4 LUANDATO 44 topics
    5 ardz24 40 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    140 posts
    2 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    110 posts
    3 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    109 posts
    4 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    107 posts
    5 image description DavidG@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    72 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts