• e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors

Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary sc

This topic has 3 expert replies and 16 member replies
Goto page
  • 1,
  • 2
Next
aspirant2011 Legendary Member Default Avatar
Joined
28 Jan 2011
Posted:
1574 messages
Followed by:
13 members
Thanked:
88 times

Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary sc

Post Sat May 14, 2011 4:48 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years. Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

    A. The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.
    B. Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.
    C. Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.
    D. The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.
    E. Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.

    OA: Will be posted later. Please discuss each answer choice in detail.

    Thanked by: gtr02
    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    HSPA Legendary Member
    Joined
    28 Jan 2011
    Posted:
    1101 messages
    Followed by:
    13 members
    Thanked:
    47 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    720
    GMAT Score:
    640
    Post Sat May 14, 2011 5:10 am
    I am with A.. though C and E are good contenders

    A>C>E

    Again on negation A has no impact on the conclusion.. it must be C.

    Thanks for the assumption questions aspirant..

    _________________
    First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
    Second take: coming soon..
    Regards,
    HSPA.

    aspirant2011 Legendary Member Default Avatar
    Joined
    28 Jan 2011
    Posted:
    1574 messages
    Followed by:
    13 members
    Thanked:
    88 times
    Post Sat May 14, 2011 7:28 am
    OA is C Sad............but I am totally not able to understand how it can be C Sad.............please explain Sad

    mundasingh123 Legendary Member Default Avatar
    Joined
    15 Jan 2010
    Posted:
    2330 messages
    Followed by:
    26 members
    Thanked:
    56 times
    Post Sat May 14, 2011 10:26 am
    hi whats the source ?

    _________________
    I Seek Explanations Not Answers

    aspirant2011 Legendary Member Default Avatar
    Joined
    28 Jan 2011
    Posted:
    1574 messages
    Followed by:
    13 members
    Thanked:
    88 times
    Post Sat May 14, 2011 10:54 am
    source is sandeep gupta (ivy GMAT preparation)...........

    Thanked by: mundasingh123
    ajaarik Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
    Joined
    01 Jun 2010
    Posted:
    11 messages
    Test Date:
    SEPT 2010
    Target GMAT Score:
    740
    Post Sat May 14, 2011 9:13 pm
    I selected C when I first read the answers.
    However, A,C and E are equal contenders.

    Any concrete reasons why A and E can be eliminated.

    sourabh33 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    22 Mar 2011
    Posted:
    135 messages
    Followed by:
    3 members
    Thanked:
    21 times
    Test Date:
    25th June 2011
    GMAT Score:
    720
    Post Sat May 14, 2011 10:03 pm
    +1 for C

    Option A - After Negating - no of nurses has decreased over past 10 yrs.
    Now in the stem, the author says "the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years"

    So even if the no of nurses reduces the proportion should remain same, although actual no of cases may increase (Assuming other non allergic cases not to decrease drastically)

    Option E - Out of scope.
    The conclusion says - Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago

    nikit Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    23 Apr 2011
    Posted:
    7 messages
    Target GMAT Score:
    800
    Post Sun May 15, 2011 12:10 pm
    Can anyone please explain how 'C' can conclusively be inferred as the most appropriate option?

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Testluv GMAT Instructor Default Avatar
    Joined
    19 Oct 2009
    Posted:
    1302 messages
    Followed by:
    162 members
    Thanked:
    539 times
    GMAT Score:
    800
    Post Sun May 15, 2011 4:41 pm
    nikit wrote:
    Can anyone please explain how 'C' can conclusively be inferred as the most appropriate option?
    More and more kids are coming to the nurses office. The author argues that this can only be explained by greater exposure or greater sensitivity. So, he must be assuming that there aren't any other explanations.

    Choice C clearly defends the argument against an alternative explanation. Use the Kaplan denial test:

    If kids ARE more likely to be sent to the nurses office than before, then it is not necessarily the case that there is more exposure or more sensitivity.

    Choice A is tempting because it also seems to defend the argument against an alternative explanation; after all, if there are fewer nurses, then each nurse would naturally be seeing more kids. However, the key is that "Elementary school nurses in Renston" are a group. And as a group they are reporting an increase in kids sent to them for these allergic reactions.

    _________________
    Kaplan Teacher in Toronto

    Thanked by: m.abdulk
    Free GMAT Practice Test under Proctored Conditions! - Find a practice test near you or live and online in Kaplan's Classroom Anywhere environment. Register today!
    aspirant2011 Legendary Member Default Avatar
    Joined
    28 Jan 2011
    Posted:
    1574 messages
    Followed by:
    13 members
    Thanked:
    88 times
    Post Mon May 16, 2011 10:24 am
    Testluv wrote:
    nikit wrote:
    Can anyone please explain how 'C' can conclusively be inferred as the most appropriate option?
    More and more kids are coming to the nurses office. The author argues that this can only be explained by greater exposure or greater sensitivity. So, he must be assuming that there aren't any other explanations.

    Choice C clearly defends the argument against an alternative explanation. Use the Kaplan denial test:

    If kids ARE more likely to be sent to the nurses office than before, then it is not necessarily the case that there is more exposure or more sensitivity.

    Choice A is tempting because it also seems to defend the argument against an alternative explanation; after all, if there are fewer nurses, then each nurse would naturally be seeing more kids. However, the key is that "Elementary school nurses in Renston" are a group. And as a group they are reporting an increase in kids sent to them for these allergic reactions.
    Hi Testluv,

    In option C "Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals" over here to which is "chemicals" refering to?????Is it refering to the chemicals mentioned in the first line of the argument i.e to "cleaners or pesticides"????????

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Testluv GMAT Instructor Default Avatar
    Joined
    19 Oct 2009
    Posted:
    1302 messages
    Followed by:
    162 members
    Thanked:
    539 times
    GMAT Score:
    800
    Post Mon May 16, 2011 12:27 pm
    Hi aspirant2011,

    yes. Since choice C talks about "the chemicals" and since there is only one group of chemicals the arguer considers, it must be the same group of chemicals that the stimulus discusses.

    _________________
    Kaplan Teacher in Toronto

    Free GMAT Practice Test under Proctored Conditions! - Find a practice test near you or live and online in Kaplan's Classroom Anywhere environment. Register today!
    aspirant2011 Legendary Member Default Avatar
    Joined
    28 Jan 2011
    Posted:
    1574 messages
    Followed by:
    13 members
    Thanked:
    88 times
    Post Tue May 17, 2011 9:40 am
    Testluv wrote:
    Hi aspirant2011,

    yes. Since choice C talks about "the chemicals" and since there is only one group of chemicals the arguer considers, it must be the same group of chemicals that the stimulus discusses.
    Hi Testluv,

    The thing which is making me confused in this particular CR is that If I use the negation technique then option C becomes-

    Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals (i.e cleaners or pesticides) are more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.

    Then how is above negated option weakening my conclusion i.e

    Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago.

    I am really weak in CR part Sad........please help me out[/i]

    sk8legend408 Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    12 Aug 2011
    Posted:
    62 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    3 times
    Post Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:47 am
    Hi aspirant2011,

    Actually what choice C means is that children currently are more likely to go to the nurse if they have an allergic reaction than ten years ago. As in ten years ago even if a child had an allergic reaction he/she may not have been sent because allergic reactions were not perceived so seriously as they are now.

    Hope that helps.

    chufus Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    21 Jul 2011
    Posted:
    102 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    4 times
    Post Wed Nov 23, 2011 3:14 am
    Testluv wrote:
    nikit wrote:
    Can anyone please explain how 'C' can conclusively be inferred as the most appropriate option?
    More and more kids are coming to the nurses office. The author argues that this can only be explained by greater exposure or greater sensitivity. So, he must be assuming that there aren't any other explanations.

    Choice C clearly defends the argument against an alternative explanation. Use the Kaplan denial test:

    If kids ARE more likely to be sent to the nurses office than before, then it is not necessarily the case that there is more exposure or more sensitivity.

    Choice A is tempting because it also seems to defend the argument against an alternative explanation; after all, if there are fewer nurses, then each nurse would naturally be seeing more kids. However, the key is that "Elementary school nurses in Renston" are a group. And as a group they are reporting an increase in kids sent to them for these allergic reactions.
    I think Choice A is never tempting because the argument explicitly says "Proportion of Children", that means the number of school children and the number of nurses does not matter at all. And hence C becomes a clear winner. Just an observation. The key always lies in the use of certain "Key Words", if you may, and these key words generally will lead you to the right answer. The answer is always in the argument....

    karthikgmat Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    09 Jul 2008
    Posted:
    172 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    3 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    750
    GMAT Score:
    610
    Post Wed Nov 23, 2011 5:22 pm
    The conclusion is Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago. , So the assumption would be lying on children exposed to chemicals . From the options A , C are possible. After you negate A, it doesnt attack the argument." simply A doesnt even talk about children, eliminate. E is out of scope, as it was saying about renston's population

    so IMO C.

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 lheiannie07 116 topics
    2 LUANDATO 62 topics
    3 swerve 62 topics
    4 ardz24 61 topics
    5 AAPL 58 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    172 posts
    2 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

    Target Test Prep

    154 posts
    3 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    131 posts
    4 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    127 posts
    5 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    125 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts