• Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors

Expert's Help: Author's Opinion

This topic has 3 expert replies and 2 member replies
imskpwr Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
14 Sep 2011
Posted:
377 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Thanked:
10 times
Target GMAT Score:
750

Expert's Help: Author's Opinion

Post Sun Jul 23, 2017 6:28 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Can any expert share his or her views on the below understandings?

    I believe that ANY Conclusion presented in a passage MUST BE an OPINION of Author if no other group/person is mentioned.
    Further, the final Author's POV( Author's conclusion) is the MAIN IDEA.

    Believing in above points, I observe that most of the GMAT passages are opinionated.
    But the passage tone is NEUTRAL, unless main idea is about some persuasion or criticism of the subject.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    Post Mon Jul 24, 2017 8:13 am
    imskpwr wrote:
    Can any expert share his or her views on the below understandings?

    I believe that ANY Conclusion presented in a passage MUST BE an OPINION of Author if no other group/person is mentioned.
    Further, the final Author's POV( Author's conclusion) is the MAIN IDEA.

    Believing in above points, I observe that most of the GMAT passages are opinionated.
    But the passage tone is NEUTRAL, unless main idea is about some persuasion or criticism of the subject.
    Yeah, that appears to be a reasonable understanding of how passages on the GMAT operate. It's also helpful to be primed to recognize that certain structural markers indicate that the author is about to present her own opinion, which will often contradict a notion that someone else has professed. For example: Professor Horkins published his study regarding the importance of lower marginal tax rates in 1987, however, more recent, higher quality work has since undermined those conclusions.

    _________________
    Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

    Veritas Prep Reviews
    Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

    Thanked by: imskpwr
    Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Post Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:23 am
    imskpwr wrote:
    Can any expert share his or her views on the below understandings?

    I believe that ANY Conclusion presented in a passage MUST BE an OPINION of Author if no other group/person is mentioned.
    Further, the final Author's POV( Author's conclusion) is the MAIN IDEA.

    Believing in above points, I observe that most of the GMAT passages are opinionated.
    But the passage tone is NEUTRAL, unless main idea is about some persuasion or criticism of the subject.
    Dear imskpwr,
    I'm happy to respond. Smile

    I like the comment that my colleague DavidG at Veritas shared.

    I will add that it's very hard to make one-size-fits-all rules for the GMAT CR. Students often want to cling to a hard and fast rule, but the GMAT excels at defying our expectations. Yes, a general rule, the only time an author would quote someone is either to use it as support for his own argument or to qualify or refute it (what DavidG suggested). Those definitely are the general patterns, but I would be quite reluctant to say that every quote in every GMAT CR passage falls neatly into one of those two categories. Each argument on the GMAT CR is so different--it's just hard to say.

    Rather than formulate fixed rules for the GMAT CR, I think it is considerably more productive to understand how the logic of the business world plays into CR questions. See this blog article:
    GMAT Critical Reasoning and Outside Knowledge

    Does all this make sense?
    Mike Smile

    _________________
    Magoosh GMAT Instructor
    http://gmat.magoosh.com/

    imskpwr Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    14 Sep 2011
    Posted:
    377 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    10 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    750
    Post Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:24 am
    Mike@Magoosh wrote:
    I will add that it's very hard to make one-size-fits-all rules for the GMAT CR.
    Mike Smile
    Sir,
    I am sorry, but my previous post was in fact about Reading Comprehension Passages.
    However, the CR article you shared was quite useful.



    Last edited by imskpwr on Mon Jul 24, 2017 11:01 am; edited 1 time in total

    imskpwr Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
    Joined
    14 Sep 2011
    Posted:
    377 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    10 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    750
    Post Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:56 am
    DavidG@VeritasPrep wrote:
    Yeah, that appears to be a reasonable understanding of how passages on the GMAT operate. It's also helpful to be primed to recognize that certain structural markers indicate that the author is about to present her own opinion, which will often contradict a notion that someone else has professed. For example: Professor Horkins published his study regarding the importance of lower marginal tax rates in 1987, however, more recent, higher quality work has since undermined those conclusions.
    Thanks a lot. That was quite a relief.

    Considering the point u raised, I understand that such structural markers indicate a change in POV( often one of them will be of AUTHOR). On such occassions, I usually check how the POV is related to the main point.

    However when these structural markers indicate a change in FACTS, do I have to understand the implications/Inferences from such change?
    Generally, I have seen that descriptive passages that lacks an explicit main idea have their main idea dependent upon these factual changes.

    Post Tue Jul 25, 2017 6:26 am
    imskpwr wrote:
    DavidG@VeritasPrep wrote:
    Yeah, that appears to be a reasonable understanding of how passages on the GMAT operate. It's also helpful to be primed to recognize that certain structural markers indicate that the author is about to present her own opinion, which will often contradict a notion that someone else has professed. For example: Professor Horkins published his study regarding the importance of lower marginal tax rates in 1987, however, more recent, higher quality work has since undermined those conclusions.
    Thanks a lot. That was quite a relief.

    Considering the point u raised, I understand that such structural markers indicate a change in POV( often one of them will be of AUTHOR). On such occassions, I usually check how the POV is related to the main point.

    However when these structural markers indicate a change in FACTS, do I have to understand the implications/Inferences from such change?
    Generally, I have seen that descriptive passages that lacks an explicit main idea have their main idea dependent upon these factual changes.
    Typically, these passages will operated according to following structure/logic.

    1) Traditionally, people believed 'x' was true.
    2) However, recent studies have revealed 'y,' which contradicts x.'
    3) An explanation for the above.

    This is all to say that you're right - it's crucial to understand the impact it has on the passage when a long-accepted hypothesis (or perceived fact) is overturned. And paragraph 3 could go a number of ways. It's possible that the explanation will somehow reconcile the two hypotheses so that they merely appear to contradict each other, but are complementary in a surprising way. But it's also possible that the explanation will reveal additional evidence substantiating claim 'y.' Mostly, you want to be able to use transitions and structural clues to develop an intuitive sense of when the thrust of the passage shifts, and then be prepared for a variety of potential interpretations of what the shifts mean in terms of the passage's main idea.

    _________________
    Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

    Veritas Prep Reviews
    Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

    Thanked by: imskpwr
    Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 lheiannie07 111 topics
    2 ardz24 64 topics
    3 LUANDATO 62 topics
    4 swerve 60 topics
    5 AAPL 57 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    160 posts
    2 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    130 posts
    3 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    122 posts
    4 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    122 posts
    5 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

    Target Test Prep

    118 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts