• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

## Error in OG Data Sufficiency Book - check my math

This topic has 1 expert reply and 4 member replies
MaleInNC2007 Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Joined
22 Oct 2006
Posted:
6 messages

#### Error in OG Data Sufficiency Book - check my math

Mon Jan 22, 2007 7:06 pm
I have issues with the following Data Sufficiency problem in
the OG 11 edition. I also have a question at the bottom.

Problem 132 (answer on page 331)

If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?

(1)n has exactly two positive factors.
(2)The difference of any two positive distinct factors of n is odd.

n can be any prime number.

(2)I say not sufficient. n could be 6 or 2.

The factors of 6 are 1, 2, and 3.

3-2 = 1; 2-1 = 1; both 3-2 and
2-1 are the difference of any two positive factors of n and both are odd
satisfying the requirements of (2); n could also be 2; the factors of
2 are 1 and 2; 2-1 = 1 which is odd

Thus, n could be 2 or 6; not
sufficient

Using both (1) and (2) it would leave the only number possible as 2 thus the answer is C

The OG says (2) is sufficient. I disagree for the
aforementioned reasons.

The answer in the book is subtracting n with the distinct factor. It states that if n is greater than 2 and n is odd, then 1 and n are factors of n,
and their difference is even. Also, if n
is greater than 2 and n is even, then 2 and n are factors, and the difference is even. Even using this logic, using 6 = n can still
result in satisfying (2) For example,
6-3 = 3; 3 is odd thus giving 6 and 2 as possible answers.

(2) asks for the difference of any two positive distinct factors though, not the difference between n and the factors. I believe the answer to this
problem in the OG is wrong.

Also, another question:

is zero an integer?

I say yes. I cannot remember the problem but it required an integer, and when zero was used, the answer I obtained was different than the answer in the OG. I am curious if the GMAT doesn't consider zero to be an integer. I'm reviewing for the GMAT next Monday and if I can find the problem I will post it.

Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
coachy Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Joined
11 Feb 2007
Posted:
3 messages
Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:06 pm
You are right. I was confused about this question. And it suddenly dawned on me that I have to consider the statement 2 as true and evaluate if n can be 2. I was trying to prove the statement 2 as wrong but I guess that is what DS practice is about. I have to keep on reminding myself that the statement 1 and 2 are universal truths.

_________________
gogmat

Tame the CAT Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
04 Mar 2007
Posted:
46 messages
Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:37 pm
3-1 is even. So it cannot be 6.

coachy Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Joined
11 Feb 2007
Posted:
3 messages
Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:06 pm
You are right. I was confused about this question. And it suddenly dawned on me that I have to consider the statement 2 as true and evaluate if n can be 2. I was trying to prove the statement 2 as wrong but I guess that is what DS practice is about. I have to keep on reminding myself that the statement 1 and 2 are universal truths.

_________________
gogmat

Tame the CAT Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
04 Mar 2007
Posted:
46 messages
Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:37 pm
3-1 is even. So it cannot be 6.

colinbendell Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Joined
23 Jan 2007
Posted:
4 messages
Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:43 pm
MaleInNC2007 wrote:
The factors of 6 are 1, 2, and 3.
The Factors of 6 are actually 1, 2, 3 and 6.

Notice that the statement does not imply only prime factors - all factors are valid. Therefore if you take any two factors you could come up with 6 - 2 which of course is a positive and therefore does not qualify for statement #2.

The answer in the OG is correct.

### Best Conversation Starters

1 lheiannie07 112 topics
2 swerve 64 topics
3 LUANDATO 64 topics
4 ardz24 61 topics
5 AAPL 57 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

227 posts
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

176 posts
3 Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

168 posts
4 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

138 posts
5 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

129 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts