• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

## Environmentalist: The commissioner of the Fish and Game Auth

tagged by:

This topic has 5 member replies
vinni.k Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Posted:
320 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Thanked:
5 times
Test Date:
2016
Target GMAT Score:
700+
GMAT Score:
620

#### Environmentalist: The commissioner of the Fish and Game Auth

Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:46 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
• Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
Environmentalist: The commissioner of the Fish and Game Authority would have the public believe that increases in the number of marine fish caught demonstrate that this resource is no longer endangered. This is a specious argument, as unsound as it would be to assert that the ever-increasing rate at which rain forests are being cut down demonstrates a lack of danger to that resource. The real cause of the increased fish-catch is a greater efficiency in using technologies that deplete resources.

The environmentalist's statements, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?

(A) The use of technology is the reason for the increasing encroachment of people on nature.
(B) It is possible to determine how many fish are in the sea in some way other than by catching fish.
(C) The proportion of marine fish that are caught is as high as the proportion of rain forest'trees that are cut down each year.
(D) Modern technologies waste resources by catching inedible fish.
(E) Marine fish continue to be an endangered resource.

Can anyone please explain what is wrong with A. Both A and E seems to be very close to me, but I don't understand the exact reason to eliminate A. If anyone can explain in detail, that would be great..
Thanks & Regards
Vinni

Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
MakeUrTimeCount Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
11 Dec 2011
Posted:
104 messages
Followed by:
3 members
Thanked:
11 times
Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:04 am
The environmentalist opposed the commissioner's believe that "the resource is no longer endangered" i.e he put his points forward to conclude the reverse.

Also the paragraph does no say that the use of technology is causing increased enrochment. It just says that greater efficiency is the cause if increased fish-catch.

I hope above make sense.

Thanked by: vinni.k
vinni.k Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Posted:
320 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Thanked:
5 times
Test Date:
2016
Target GMAT Score:
700+
GMAT Score:
620
Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:07 am
MakeUrTimeCount wrote:
The environmentalist opposed the commissioner's believe that "the resource is no longer endangered" i.e he put his points forward to conclude the reverse.

Also the paragraph does no say that the use of technology is causing increased enrochment. It just says that greater efficiency is the cause if increased fish-catch.

I hope above make sense.

By posting this question, I wanted to know if I am moving in the right direction.

Regards
Vinni

GmatVerbal Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Posted:
138 messages
Followed by:
3 members
Thanked:
19 times
Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:50 pm
Environmentalist argument: Increased numbers are due to greater efficiency in using the technologies. Doesn't mean increased encroachment?

avik.ch Legendary Member
Joined
20 Apr 2011
Posted:
641 messages
Followed by:
32 members
Thanked:
149 times
Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:48 pm
I will extend to what GmatVerbal has mentioned !!

Here the issue of "rain forest" is an analogy or in simple term "additional premise". This is a typical logical structure : where you want to bolster the conclusion with some parallel cases or example. They add no values to the theme or main point of the passages/stimulus.

So when we find the conclusion we will not see this "rain forest" issue in the answer choice --

Now I hope you got why E is the answer !!

This structure often give rise to "false analogy" - when the dynamics of the comparison do not have enough parallels then the analogy must be deemed false. This is a typical logical fallacy.

E.g : Being forced to pay higher taxes to pay for universal healthcare is unjust because it is like Mr.X being forced to the back of the bus.

I hope this helps !!

amit.trivedi@ymail.com Legendary Member
Joined
09 Nov 2010
Posted:
934 messages
Followed by:
14 members
Thanked:
63 times
Test Date:
N.A
Target GMAT Score:
750
Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:35 am
Yes avik is right...

The environmentalist is giving a counter premise by giving a parallel reasoning.

There is nothing to do with the trees and the forests.

hence E.

Hope this helped...

_________________
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.

### Best Conversation Starters

1 Vincen 180 topics
2 lheiannie07 61 topics
3 Roland2rule 54 topics
4 ardz24 44 topics
5 VJesus12 14 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

155 posts
2 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

105 posts
3 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

101 posts
4 Jay@ManhattanReview

Manhattan Review

82 posts
5 Matt@VeritasPrep

Veritas Prep

80 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts