• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to $200 Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Practice Test & Review How would you score if you took the GMAT Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Veritas GMAT Class Experience Lesson 1 Live Free Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Get 300+ Practice Questions 25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 1 Hour Free BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5-Day Free Trial 5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Magoosh Study with Magoosh GMAT prep Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5 Day FREE Trial Study Smarter, Not Harder Available with Beat the GMAT members only code ## Electricity This topic has 3 expert replies and 9 member replies aroon7 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 20 Dec 2008 Posted: 160 messages Thanked: 11 times #### Electricity Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:03 pm Elapsed Time: 00:00 • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME]) In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still C) there were less than one percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being D) there was less then one percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been OA - A. Is this option not comparing electricity with theatres, restaurants... Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums! piyush_nitt Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 07 Dec 2008 Posted: 424 messages Thanked: 12 times Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:08 am aroon7 wrote: In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still C) there were less than one percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being D) there was less then one percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been OA - A. Is this option not comparing electricity with theatres, restaurants... Aaroon , As far as my understanding we don't use BUT for comparisons. BUT is used in sentences where author wants to show a "contrast". For comparsion , generally like or As is used. I think its quite easy to choose a right choice in this sentence, if you look at the "where" clause. where should refer to home. B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still C) there were less than one percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being - D) there was less then one percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still - electricity having lighting wrong E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been aroon7 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 20 Dec 2008 Posted: 160 messages Thanked: 11 times Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:31 pm piyush_nitt wrote: aroon7 wrote: In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still C) there were less than one percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being D) there was less then one percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been OA - A. Is this option not comparing electricity with theatres, restaurants... Aaroon , As far as my understanding we don't use BUT for comparisons. BUT is used in sentences where author wants to show a "contrast". For comparsion , generally like or As is used. I think its quite easy to choose a right choice in this sentence, if you look at the "where" clause. where should refer to home. B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still C) there were less than one percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being - D) there was less then one percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still - electricity having lighting wrong E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been thanks Pyuish! i chose E mmslf75 Legendary Member Joined 09 Aug 2009 Posted: 503 messages Followed by: 2 members Thanked: 30 times Target GMAT Score: 800 Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:14 am aroon7 wrote: In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still C) there were less than one percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being D) there was less then one percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been OA - A. Is this option not comparing electricity with theatres, restaurants... OA is A here, I have no issues in understanding why it is so.. The one thing that disturbs me is the use of LESS, here for number of homes ?? Don't u think its awkward... It should have been few right ????? I have one more example...where LESS is used this way... Even though the direct costs of malpractice disputes amounted to less than one percent of the$541 billion the nation spent on health care last year, doctors say fear of lawsuits plays a major role in health-care inflation

Now less than 1% if 541b$is a value...so why LESS used here ?? Indeed, an other example When drive-ins were at the height of their popularity in the late 1950s, some 4,000 existed in the United States, but today there are less than one-quarter that many A. there are less than one-quarter that many B. there are fewer than one-quarter as many C. there are fewer than one-quarter of that amount D. the number is less than one-quarter the amount E. it is less than one-quarter of that amount OA is B... Please note I am not doubting the correctness of the anwers ... but would like to have inputs on this concept.. x2suresh Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 07 Aug 2008 Posted: 258 messages Thanked: 16 times Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:25 pm mmslf75 wrote: aroon7 wrote: In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still C) there were less than one percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being D) there was less then one percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been OA - A. Is this option not comparing electricity with theatres, restaurants... OA is A here, I have no issues in understanding why it is so.. The one thing that disturbs me is the use of LESS, here for number of homes ?? Don't u think its awkward... It should have been few right ????? I have one more example...where LESS is used this way... Even though the direct costs of malpractice disputes amounted to less than one percent of the$541 billion the nation spent on health care last year, doctors say fear of lawsuits plays a major role in health-care inflation

Now less than 1% if 541b$is a value...so why LESS used here ?? Indeed, an other example When drive-ins were at the height of their popularity in the late 1950s, some 4,000 existed in the United States, but today there are less than one-quarter that many A. there are less than one-quarter that many B. there are fewer than one-quarter as many C. there are fewer than one-quarter of that amount D. the number is less than one-quarter the amount E. it is less than one-quarter of that amount OA is B... Please note I am not doubting the correctness of the anwers ... but would like to have inputs on this concept.. First two examples.. we are taking about percentage (%) not the number Ask questions How much percentage ? --> sounds good right How many percentage? --> Not correct. % is uncountable --> less is appropriate here. Last example we are taking about numbers (Drive-ins are countable) How many marks? -->not correct How much marks? --> few is appropriate here.. I got fewer marks than you . I got less percentage than you. I hope this clears your doubt gmatv09 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 10 Aug 2009 Posted: 256 messages Thanked: 3 times Target GMAT Score: 740+ Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:59 pm IMO A becoz ... where correctly refers to homes mmslf75 Legendary Member Joined 09 Aug 2009 Posted: 503 messages Followed by: 2 members Thanked: 30 times Target GMAT Score: 800 Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:42 pm x2suresh wrote: mmslf75 wrote: aroon7 wrote: In the major cities of industrialized countries at the end of the nineteenth century, important public places such as theaters, restaurants, shops and banks had installed electric lighting, but electricity was in less than one percent of homes, where lighting was still provided mainly by candles or gas B) electricity was in less than one percent of homes and lighting still C) there were less than one percent of homes with electricity, where lighting was still being D) there was less then one percent of homes that had electricity, having lighting that was still E) less than one percent of homes had electricity, where lighting had still been OA - A. Is this option not comparing electricity with theatres, restaurants... OA is A here, I have no issues in understanding why it is so.. The one thing that disturbs me is the use of LESS, here for number of homes ?? Don't u think its awkward... It should have been few right ????? I have one more example...where LESS is used this way... Even though the direct costs of malpractice disputes amounted to less than one percent of the$541 billion the nation spent on health care last year, doctors say fear of lawsuits plays a major role in health-care inflation

Now less than 1% if 541b$is a value...so why LESS used here ?? Indeed, an other example When drive-ins were at the height of their popularity in the late 1950s, some 4,000 existed in the United States, but today there are less than one-quarter that many A. there are less than one-quarter that many B. there are fewer than one-quarter as many C. there are fewer than one-quarter of that amount D. the number is less than one-quarter the amount E. it is less than one-quarter of that amount OA is B... Please note I am not doubting the correctness of the anwers ... but would like to have inputs on this concept.. First two examples.. we are taking about percentage (%) not the number Ask questions How much percentage ? --> sounds good right How many percentage? --> Not correct. % is uncountable --> less is appropriate here. Last example we are taking about numbers (Drive-ins are countable) How many marks? -->not correct How much marks? --> few is appropriate here.. I got fewer marks than you . I got less percentage than you. I hope this clears your doubt Agreed, but literal meaning will require usage of "FEW"... I am confused..>!! ### GMAT/MBA Expert lunarpower GMAT Instructor Joined 03 Mar 2008 Posted: 3380 messages Followed by: 1470 members Thanked: 2254 times GMAT Score: 800 Fri Dec 18, 2009 10:16 pm hmm. i would agree with you here: it should be "fewer than 1% of homes", because we're still talking about individual homes. (it's an exact correlation to "fewer than one-quarter that many" on the later example; i don't think the gmat uses fractions any differently than it uses percents). my only possible explanation is that, sometimes, they get sloppy with things that are either (a) in ALL of the choices, or (b) in the non-underlined part. things that are in these locations don't contribute to the solution of the problem, so they can afford the sloppiness ... but still, it's not a good thing for those of you who are trying to learn! as another example, there's a problem, somewhere in the OG, whose solution actually boils down to "estimated at" vs. "estimated to be" - i.e., this is the ONLY thing separating the correct answer from one of the incorrect answers - and the solution says that "estimated at AGE" is wrong and "estimated to be AGE" is correct. but then they turn around and do this: http://www.beatthegmat.com/sc-with-surface-temperatures-estimated-at-minus-230-degrees-t43734.html i can only surmise that the same sort of thing is happening here. _________________ Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years. -- Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano On peut poser des questions à Ron en français Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi -- Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur. Yves Saint-Laurent -- Learn more about ron Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week. ### GMAT/MBA Expert lunarpower GMAT Instructor Joined 03 Mar 2008 Posted: 3380 messages Followed by: 1470 members Thanked: 2254 times GMAT Score: 800 Fri Dec 18, 2009 10:20 pm mmslf75 wrote: I have one more example...where LESS is used this way... Even though the direct costs of malpractice disputes amounted to less than one percent of the$541 billion the nation spent on health care last year, doctors say fear of lawsuits plays a major role in health-care inflation
this, on the other hand, is correct usage.

when you have NUMBER + UNIT OF MEASURE, you should use the terms that are normally reserved for uncountables.
for instance:
i am less than 6 feet tall (not "i am fewer than 6 feet tall")
some of the books cost as little as $2 (not "as few as$2")

there's a rationale behind this - i can explain if you're interested - although the rationale is ultimately irrelevant; you just want to make sure that you understand the rule itself.

_________________
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week.
mmslf75 Legendary Member
Joined
09 Aug 2009
Posted:
503 messages
Followed by:
2 members
Thanked:
30 times
Target GMAT Score:
800
Sat Dec 19, 2009 7:22 am
lunarpower wrote:
mmslf75 wrote:
I have one more example...where LESS is used this way...

Even though the direct costs of malpractice disputes amounted to less than one percent of the $541 billion the nation spent on health care last year, doctors say fear of lawsuits plays a major role in health-care inflation this, on the other hand, is correct usage. when you have NUMBER + UNIT OF MEASURE, you should use the terms that are normally reserved for uncountables. for instance: i am less than 6 feet tall (not "i am fewer than 6 feet tall") some of the books cost as little as$2 (not "as few as $2") there's a rationale behind this - i can explain if you're interested - although the rationale is ultimately irrelevant; you just want to make sure that you understand the rule itself. Thanks RON..will remember that,, One more TAKEAWAY !~! ### GMAT/MBA Expert lunarpower GMAT Instructor Joined 03 Mar 2008 Posted: 3380 messages Followed by: 1470 members Thanked: 2254 times GMAT Score: 800 Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:04 pm mmslf75 wrote: Thanks RON..will remember that,, One more TAKEAWAY !~! you got it. remember, the takeaways are all that really matters in the end. good luck _________________ Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years. -- Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano On peut poser des questions à Ron en français Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi -- Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur. Yves Saint-Laurent -- Learn more about ron Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week. Nina1987 Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Joined 15 Dec 2015 Posted: 79 messages Followed by: 1 members GMAT Score: 750 Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:29 pm Ron, can you explain the rationale pls? Thanks lunarpower wrote: mmslf75 wrote: I have one more example...where LESS is used this way... Even though the direct costs of malpractice disputes amounted to less than one percent of the$541 billion the nation spent on health care last year, doctors say fear of lawsuits plays a major role in health-care inflation
this, on the other hand, is correct usage.

when you have NUMBER + UNIT OF MEASURE, you should use the terms that are normally reserved for uncountables.
for instance:
i am less than 6 feet tall (not "i am fewer than 6 feet tall")
some of the books cost as little as $2 (not "as few as$2")

there's a rationale behind this - i can explain if you're interested - although the rationale is ultimately irrelevant; you just want to make sure that you understand the rule itself.

Nina1987 Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
15 Dec 2015
Posted:
79 messages
Followed by:
1 members
GMAT Score:
750
Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:45 pm
also, can we rule out E and C, simply cuz they violate touch rule ('where', a relative pronoun, wronlgy modifying 'electricity') w/o looking any other errors? thanks

### Best Conversation Starters

1 Vincen 132 topics
2 lheiannie07 65 topics
3 LUANDATO 54 topics
4 Roland2rule 43 topics
5 ardz24 40 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

133 posts
2 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

114 posts
3 EconomistGMATTutor

The Economist GMAT Tutor

113 posts
4 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

109 posts
5 DavidG@VeritasPrep

Veritas Prep

72 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts