As source of electrical power, windmills now account for only about 2500 megawatts nationwide, but production is almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.
A) almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide
B) almost expected that it will double by the end of the year, thus providing
C) expected that it will most double by the end of the year to provide
D) expected almost to double by the end of the year and thus to provide
E) expected almost to double by the end of the year, which would thus be providing
OAD
My Doubts: Please explain why WHICH is wrong in [spoiler]A & E[/spoiler].
Also can IT in option C used as EXPLETIVE?
Many thanks in advance.
Kavin
electrical power
This topic has expert replies
- OptimusPrep
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 3:36 am
- Location: Worldwide
- Thanked: 120 times
- Followed by:8 members
- GMAT Score:770
Meaning of the sentence: Production is expected to almost double and this would provide energyNeedgmat wrote:As source of electrical power, windmills now account for only about 2500 megawatts nationwide, but production is almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.
A) almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide
B) almost expected that it will double by the end of the year, thus providing
C) expected that it will most double by the end of the year to provide
D) expected almost to double by the end of the year and thus to provide
E) expected almost to double by the end of the year, which would thus be providing
OAD
My Doubts: Please explain why WHICH is wrong in [spoiler]A & E[/spoiler].
Also can IT in option C used as EXPLETIVE?
Many thanks in advance.
Kavin
In options A and E, usage of which illogically conveys the meaning that years would provide the energy.
In option C, it can be used as expletive
Does this help?
Hi Optimus ,Meaning of the sentence: Production is expected to almost double and this would provide energy
In options A and E, usage of which illogically conveys the meaning that years would provide the energy.
Thanks for your reply. Clear this part.
If expletive is right in this option, then why this option is wrong? Please explain.In option C, it can be used as expletive
Many thanks in advance.
Kavin
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Forms of to be include is, was, has been, etc.Needgmat wrote:can IT in option C used as EXPLETIVE?
Generally, it may serve as an expletive only if it is followed by a FORM OF TO BE.
Official examples:
IT WAS only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers.
IT WAS under her command that the paper won high praise.
IT IS unclear whether chimpanzees are unique among nonhuman species.
For a discussion of these examples, check my second post here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/sentence-str ... 82034.html
C: production is expected that it will double
Here, it is followed by an action verb -- will double -- indicating that it is NOT serving as an expletive.
As a result, it seems to refer to production, conveying the following meaning:
production is expected that production will double.
This meaning is nonsensical.
Eliminate C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
[/quote]Forms of to be include is, was, has been, etc.
Generally, it may serve as an expletive only if it is followed by a FORM OF TO BE.
Official examples:
IT WAS only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers.
IT WAS under her command that the paper won high praise.
IT IS unclear whether chimpanzees are unique among nonhuman species.
For a discussion of these examples, check my second post here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/sentence-str ... 82034.html
C: production is expected that it will double
Here, it is followed by an action verb -- will double -- indicating that it is NOT serving as an expletive.
As a result, it seems to refer to production, conveying the following meaning:
production is expected that production will double.
This meaning is nonsensical.
Eliminate C.
Hi GMATGuruNY ,
Thank you so much for your reply.
I have gone through second post and what I understood is that if IT follows the that-clause, weather-clause, or an infinitive phrase, then IT can use as expletive right?
Here, in this SC IT is not followed any one of these, so that's why IT is not used as Expletive right ?
Please confirm and correct me if I misunderstood any point.
Many thanks in advance.
Kavin
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
To serve as an expletive, it must PRECEDE one of these clauses.Needgmat wrote:what I understood is that if IT follows the that-clause, weather-clause, or an infinitive phrase, then IT can use as expletive right?
Correct.Here, in this SC IT is not followed any one of these, so that's why IT is not used as Expletive right ?
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Hi GMATGuruNY ,GMATGuruNY wrote:To serve as an expletive, it must PRECEDE one of these clauses.Needgmat wrote:what I understood is that if IT follows the that-clause, weather-clause, or an infinitive phrase, then IT can use as expletive right?
Correct.Here, in this SC IT is not followed any one of these, so that's why IT is not used as Expletive right ?
Thank you so much sir for your great explanation.
It really helps.
Thanks,
Kavin