Beat The GMAT

rahul.s · Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:05 am

Linda Kerber argued in the mid-1980's that after the American Revolution (1775-1783), an ideology of "republican motherhood" resulted in a surge of educational opportunities for women in the United States. Kerber maintained that the leaders of the new nation wanted women to be educated in order to raise politically virtuous sons. A virtuous citizenry was considered essential to the success of the country's republican form of government; virtue was to be instilled not only by churches and schools, but by families, where the mother's role was crucial. Thus, according to Kerber, motherhood became pivotal to the fate of the republic, providing justification for an unprecedented attention to female education.
Introduction of the republican motherhood thesis dramatically changed historiography. Prior to Kerber's work, educational historians barely mentioned women and girls; Thomas Woody's 1929 work is the notable exception. Examining newspaper advertisements for academies, Woody found that educational opportunities increased for both girls and boys around 1750. Pointing to "An Essay on Woman"(1753) as reflecting a shift in view, Woody also claimed that practical education for females had many advocates before the Revolution. Woody's evidence challenges the notion that the Revolution changed attitudes regarding female education, although it may have accelerated earlier trends. Historians' reliance on Kerber's "republican motherhood" thesis may have obscured the presence of these trends, making it difficult to determine to what extent the Revolution really changed women's lives.

1) According to the passage, within the field of educational history, Thomas Woody's 1929 work was

A) innovative because it relied on newspaper advertisements as evidence
B) exceptional in that it concentrated on the period before the American Revolution
C) unusual in that it focused on educational attitudes rather than on educational practices
D) controversial in its claims regarding educational opportunities for boys
E) atypical in that it examined the education of girls

I'm confused between B and E

Suggestions?

Recommend this topic

Back to top

sadullaevd · Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:19 am

IMO B

exceptional in that it concentrated on the period before(1753) the American Revolution (1775-1783)

"An Essay on Woman"(1753) before American Revolution(1775-1783)

share OA plz

Back to top

rahul.s · Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:23 am

But doesn't the passage also mention that 'Prior to Kerber's work, educational historians barely mentioned women and girls; Thomas Woody's 1929 work is the notable exception'

So wouldn't that make E a strong contender?

The OA is B, but I've been advised that there is a possibility the OA is wrong Smile