The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteen Amendment (1868) had been originally adopted in order that blacks in the post-Civil War South be given the full benefit of citizenship, but over the past century and a half they are expanding it to include all categories of civil rights.
A.had been originally adopted in order that blacks in the post-Civil War South be given the full benefit of citizenship, but over the past century and a half they are expanding it to include
B.was originally adopted to give blacks in the post-Civil War South the full benefit of citizenship, but over the past century and a half it has been expanded to include
C.had been originally adopted to give blacks in the post-Civil War South the full benefit of citizenship, while over the past century and a half was expanding it to include
D.had been originally adopted to give blacks in the post-Civil War South the full benefit of citizenship, and over the past century and a half has expanded to include
E.had been originally adopted by giving blacks in the post-Civil War South the full benefit of citizenship, and over the past century and a half they have been expanding it to include
my doubt: i have a little issue with the answer choice B. i feel that the usage of "BUT" is not right somehow. the requisite contrast, which is required for the usage of "BUT", is missing in the SC.
the first part of the SC before "BUT" is "The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteen Amendment (1868) was originally adopted to give blacks in the post-Civil War South the full benefit of citizenship"
AND the second part of the SC is "but over the past century and a half it has been expanded to include all categories of civil rights".
WHERE is the CONTRAST if initially the the EPC intended to give blacks "full benefit of citizenship" AND later if extended to include "all categories of civil rights"?
shouldn't the better answer would have been: was originally adopted to give blacks in the post-Civil War South the full benefit of citizenship, AND over the past century and a half it has been expanded to include
doubt 34
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 am
- Thanked: 46 times
- Followed by:14 members
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi aditya8062,
Yes, Answer B could have been written with the word "and" instead of the word "but", but that would have changed the meaning of the sentence. To be fair, either meaning (yours or the author's) is functionally correct.
Your version of this sentence would provide a bit of a "history lesson" about the 14th amendment and when certain rights were granted. The author's version contrasts the original purpose of the 14th amendment with ALL of the various benefits that it now provides today.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Yes, Answer B could have been written with the word "and" instead of the word "but", but that would have changed the meaning of the sentence. To be fair, either meaning (yours or the author's) is functionally correct.
Your version of this sentence would provide a bit of a "history lesson" about the 14th amendment and when certain rights were granted. The author's version contrasts the original purpose of the 14th amendment with ALL of the various benefits that it now provides today.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
B: The Equal Protection Clause was ORIGINALLY adopted to give blacks the full benefit of citizenship, but OVER THE PAST CENTURY AND A HALF it has been expanded.aditya8062 wrote:my doubt: i have a little issue with the answer choice B. WHERE is the CONTRAST[/i]?
Here, what ORIGINALLY happened is being contrasted with what has happened OVER THE PAST CENTURY AND A HALF.
Hence, the usage of but is justified.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3