Disinformation campaign

[This topic has 7 member replies]
Free $100 Amazon.com Gift Card - Buy a GMAT course using a Beat The GMAT discount code between Mar 8-22 and get a $100 Amazon.com Gift Card. Learn more!
Post New Topic   Post Reply

geemat
Rising GMAT Star

Default Avatar

Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 43

Thanks given: 1
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

Topic: Disinformation campaign
PostTue Nov 17, 2009 11:23 am

Elapsed Time:
00:00
Lap   Why a timer is critical to improving your score

As one who has always believed that truth is our nation’s surest weapon in the propaganda war against our foes, I am distressed by reports of “disinformation” campaigns by American intelligence agents in Western Europe. In a disinformation campaign, untruths are disseminated through gullible local journalists in order to damage the interests of our enemies and protect our own. Those who defend this practice say that lying is necessary to counter Soviet disinformation campaigns aimed at damaging America’s political interests. These apologists contend that one must fight fire with fire. I would point out to the apologists that the fire department finds water more effective.

The author’s main point is that

(A) although disinformation campaigns may be effective, they are unacceptable on ethical grounds
(B) America’s moral standing in the world depends on its adherence to the truth
(C) the temporary political gains produced by disinformation campaigns generally give way to long-term losses
(D) Soviet disinformation campaigns have done little to damage America’s standing in Europe
(E) disinformation campaigns do not effectively serve the political interests of the United States
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Reply from Top Beat The GMAT Member
gmatmachoman
GMAT Titan

Default Avatar Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 1135

Thanks given: 89
Thanked 40 times in 37 posts

PostTue Nov 17, 2009 12:13 pm

IMO B
The opening line gives the hint of the main point of this argument..

_________________
My Favorite Post..

http://www.beatthegmat.com/appendicitis-t41855.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
punitkaur
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!

Default Avatar

Joined: 13 Apr 2009
Posts: 168

Thanks given: 3
Thanked 5 times in 5 posts

PostTue Nov 17, 2009 12:50 pm

Why not E? B looks more like an inference. The stimulus is mostly talking about disinformation so shouldn't that be a part of the conclusion?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Reply from Top Beat The GMAT Member
gmatmachoman
GMAT Titan

Default Avatar Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 1135

Thanks given: 89
Thanked 40 times in 37 posts

PostTue Nov 17, 2009 1:05 pm

Yeah Punit,

I never saw E..Sorry man...E really brings out the author's point..

I fully agree with u E does the thing...

_________________
My Favorite Post..

http://www.beatthegmat.com/appendicitis-t41855.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mehravikas
GMAT Titan

Default Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2008
Posts: 1162

Thanks given: 29
Thanked 16 times in 16 posts
Location: Sydney

Test Date: ********
Target GMAT Score: 740

PostTue Nov 17, 2009 1:36 pm

Why not 'A'?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pandeyvineet24
GMAT Destroyer!

Default Avatar

Joined: 02 Jun 2008
Posts: 526

Thanks given: 4
Thanked 12 times in 12 posts
Location: Atlanta

Target GMAT Score: 720

PostTue Nov 17, 2009 5:50 pm

I am with A.

i am not sure how we can conclude E, because there is no evidence in the argument to decide whether disinformation campaigns serve or do not serve the political interests of U.S
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
heshamelaziry
GMAT Destroyer!

Default Avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2009
Posts: 869

Thanks given: 61
Thanked 7 times in 6 posts
Location: California

Target GMAT Score: 600

PostTue Nov 17, 2009 8:48 pm

IMO E
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
f2006198
Just gettin' started!

Default Avatar

Joined: 17 Nov 2009
Posts: 6

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: India

Target GMAT Score: 760+

PostTue Nov 17, 2009 10:00 pm

IMO E

Opponents to the authors' arguments propound that lying is the best way to counter disinformation campaigns (propaganda war), being much more effective than 'truth' and thereby ultimately serving to further America's political interests. Hence the main argument of the passage is to a to arrive at/identify a tool for furthering American political interests. The author concludes his argument by saying that truth is more effective than other means ('lying'/'disinformation campaign') available.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post New Topic   Post Reply All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1
 
Most Active Members in Last 30 Days
1. harsh.champ 461 posts
2. shashank.ism 366 posts
3. thephoenix 323 posts
4. kstv 320 posts
5. gmatmachoman 261 posts
Most Active Experts in Last 30 Days
1. lunarpower
Manhattan GMAT Teacher
87 posts
2. Stuart Kovinsky
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
60 posts
3. Lisa Anderson
Stacy Blackman Consulting
54 posts
4. Testluv
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
49 posts
5. Bryant@VeritasPrep
Veritas Prep
41 posts