Beat The GMAT

Sharma_Gaurav · Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:06 am

Although much has been written about the theological conflicts with Darwinian theory, little is known of the powerful scientific objections that modified Darwin’s beliefs.
During Darwin’s lifetime, the accepted theory of heredity was not Mendel’s theory of particulate inheritance, which, though published, was unrecognized, but the theory of blending inheritance, which holds that forms intermediate between those of the parents result from mating. Jenkin pointed out that if a rare and favorable mutation occurred, it would soon be blended out by repeated crossings from the wild-type form. Disputing Darwin’s conception of evolution as proceeding through the natural selection of those with slightly better characteristics that arose randomly, Jenkin concluded that natural selection could not account for the tremendous diversity of life, hypothesizing that large numbers of organisms mutated simultaneously in the same direction-a controlled orthogenetic process resembling a series of “special creations.”
Since “special creationism” was an ideological target of his, Darwin found himself in a quandary. Although he did not abandon his theory, he admitted that natural selection played a much smaller part in evolution than he had previously claimed. He also embraced the Lamarckian concept that acquired traits in parents are transmitted to their offspring, thus providing a mechanism by which an entire population could change in the same direction at once.
Another potent objection came from the physicists led by Lord Kelvin, who contested the assumption of previous geologists and biologists that life had existed for billions of years, if not infinitely. How, they asked, could evolution proceed by slow steps in millions of years, and how could advanced forms recently evolved show such great differences? The Kelvinists, basing their conclusion on the assumption that the sun was an incandescent liquid mass rapidly radiating heat, calculated that the age of the earth was between 20 and 40 million years.
Admitting that their calculations were correct and their premises rational, Darwin was forced to adjust this theory. He proposed that change had occurred much more rapidly in the past than in the present, where species seemed static, and that more advanced forms varied more rapidly than lower forms. This provided further reason to advocate Lamarck’s theory of inheritance, because that could account for the rapid change.
Interestingly, both these retreats of Darwin were later shown to be faulty. The discovery that the sun runs on a nearly infinite amount of atomic fuel totally invalidated Kelvin’s argument, Mendel was “rediscovered” in the twentieth century, when it was pointed out that the particulate nature of inheritance meant that favorable mutation not only could persist, but could rapidly become prevalent.

5. The author’s attitude toward Jenkin and Kelvin can best be described as
(A) respectful
(B) contemptuous
(C) ambivalent
(D) denunciatory
(E) adulatory

6. According to the passage, Darwin modified his beliefs in order to
(A) bring them into line with the theory of particulate inheritance
(B) disprove Lord Kelvin’s view on the age of the earth
(C) meet the objections of Jenkin and Lamarck
(D) resolve the ideological conflicts about evolution
(E) dissociate himself from those who believed in “special creationism” (line 21)

8. It can be inferred from the passage that if Mendel’s work had been recognized and accepted during Darwin’s lifetime, it would have had which of the following effect?
I. It would have refuted Jenkin’s objections to Darwin’s theories.
II. It would have supported Darwin’s theory that evolution proceeds by very slow steps over millions of years.
III. It would have clarified and supported Darwin’s theory of natural selection.
(A) I only
(B) III only
(C) I and III only
(D) II and III only
(E) I, II, and III

9. All of the following can be reasonably inferred from the passage EXCEPT:
(A) The idea that evolution occurs by means of natural selection was not widely accepted until the twentieth century.
(B) Darwin’s theories were originally predicated on the assumption that the earth is more than 40 million years old.
(C) Many of Darwin’s ideas about heredity were later shown to be incorrect.
(D) Other scientists of Darwin’s time, including both Jenkin and Lamarck, believed in evolution.
(E) Darwin was the only scientist of his day who believed in natural selection.

Please give reasoning in your selection of answers

Back to top

Sharma_Gaurav · Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:12 am

Q-5 - I was in dilemma about the author taste.
Since in last paragraph he discarded all other theories which objected Darwin's/. Hence I did not think of respect from him for the Jenkin and Kevin.

How can these be respectable when we know they were not correct and discarded later in 20 th century?

Please clarify.?

Back to top

kiennguyen · Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:57 am

5.A
6.D
8.D
9.A

Back to top

loveusonu · Sat Nov 14, 2009 11:30 pm

5>A
6>Ans as to be between A&C.(Not agree with OA as E)
8>d(not agree with OA as C)
9>E

Any more takers???

Back to top

heshamelaziry · Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:40 pm

Quite annoying passage. Didn't understand anything. Laughing

Back to top

getso · Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:16 am

5.A
6.D
8.E
9.D

Could you please give the correct answers

Back to top

loveusonu · Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:27 am

Can any one please post the asnwers with Good Explanation?

Back to top

koolguy.rajeev · Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:41 am

IMO

A
D
C
A

Back to top

pnk · Sat Dec 19, 2009 5:20 am

My ans:
A, C, C, E

Pls provide OA

Back to top

duongthang · Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:40 pm

the main idea is that 2 persons object Darwin theory though theories of the two are faulty

regarding TONE QUESTION.

I find this question very hard, and wrong 90% while other question I can get correct

pls, help with this question.

Back to top

Beat The GMAT

Darwinian Theory

Free GMAT Prep Resources

GMAT Prep Discounts

Free Upcoming GMAT Events

Latest GMAT Articles

Latest GMAT Videos

Popular Resources