• Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep

Critical reasoning OG 13

This topic has 1 expert reply and 3 member replies
anksm22 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
02 Jul 2014
Posted:
124 messages
Followed by:
1 members

Critical reasoning OG 13

Post Wed Jul 16, 2014 8:36 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with
    runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than
    wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is
    clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last
    winter than it was 10 years ago.

    Which of the following, if true in Verland, most
    seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?


    (A) A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
    (B) Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
    (C) Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
    (D) Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.
    (E) Because the traditional wooden sleds can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.



    Please explain this

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    Post Wed Jul 16, 2014 11:26 pm
    This is a Weaken question. Before you can read the answer choices, write down your own pre-phrased answer. Since the argument is flawed, you might be able to think of 2-3 ways it can be weakened. Try to hone in on the BIGGEST flaw you can spot. What doesn’t make logical sense?

    Our notes:

    -Wooden in past
    -New Plastic sleds faster
    -Wooden easier to steer/slow
    -Sled injuries HIGHER last winter

    Conclusion: Plastic sleds more dangerous

    Assumption: More injuries DUE to the switch from wood to plastic

    Since this is a cause/effect claim, the easiest way to undermine this would be to show that the rise in child injuries last year is NOT due to steering/slowing. Is there another cause?

    (C) provides us with the cause. The plastic sleds themselves aren't to blame. They are being used in MORE conditions, so if there's more sledding then there's likely more accidents. So it's indirect.

    _________________
    Vivian Kerr
    GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
    http://www.GMATrockstar.com
    http://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

    Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: GMATrockstar@gmail.com

    Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! Smile

    anksm22 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    02 Jul 2014
    Posted:
    124 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Post Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:34 am
    Thanks for the reply.

    Post Mon Jul 21, 2014 11:59 pm
    You're welcome! Notice the key to this Weaken question is the key to MOST GMAT CR: identify the question stem and the expectations that go along with it, take notes on your yellow scratch pad, then make a Prediction for what you think the correct answer should be!

    Most people miss CR when they cut corners on strategy. Smile I know I do!

    _________________
    Vivian Kerr
    GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
    http://www.GMATrockstar.com
    http://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

    Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: GMATrockstar@gmail.com

    Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! Smile

    Post Sun Jul 27, 2014 8:52 am
    You should always question an argument that turns a quantitative metric such as "greater number of injuries" into a qualitative metric such as "less safe."

    We're given that a greater NUMBER of children have been injured while sledding than were 10 years ago. Does that have to mean that their sleds are less safe? We should ask:
    - Are there more children sledding now than there were 10 years ago?
    - Are children sledding more often?
    - Is the severity of accidents the same? Safety isn't just defined by number of accidents, but how severe they are.
    - Is the difference in sleds the cause of the change, or is there some other behavioral difference in children over 10 years?

    If we want to WEAKEN the argument, we need a reason to suggest that number of accidents does not correlate to safety.

    (A) A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
    This would strengthen the argument - it's more likely that the injuries were due to the plastic sleds.

    (B) Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
    Again, this would strengthen - differences in injuries is more likely to be due to the sleds, not protective gear.

    (C) Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
    Correct! This indicates that children are likely to sled more often. More sledding = more time spent / opportunity for injuries, without implying that the sled is to blame.

    (D) Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.
    This would be true of wooden and plastic sleds, so it wouldn't help us compare.

    (E) Because the traditional wooden sleds can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.
    Since the metric we're given is "number of children injured," this wouldn't make a difference. If the sled injures one person or multiple people at a time, it could still be judged unsafe.

    The answer is C.

    _________________


    Ceilidh Erickson
    Manhattan Prep GMAT & GRE instructor
    EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
    Harvard Graduate School of Education


    Manhattan Prep instructors all have 99th+ percentile scores and expert teaching experience.
    Sign up for a FREE TRIAL, and learn why we have the highest ratings in the GMAT industry!

    Thanked by: gmatdestroyer1
    Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week.

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 152 topics
    2 lheiannie07 61 topics
    3 Roland2rule 49 topics
    4 ardz24 40 topics
    5 LUANDATO 32 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    141 posts
    2 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    107 posts
    3 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    106 posts
    4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    104 posts
    5 image description Matt@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    76 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts