CR

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:29 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

CR

by vipinsharma » Thu Nov 27, 2014 11:46 pm
A company has decided to monitor how long their employees spend at lunch and on break. What would be a potential consequence of this action?


1)

The company will be better able to distinguish between delinquent and diligent employees.

2)

Employees will be more careful and avoid long breaks.

3)

Employees will be stressed about having to reduce their break time.

4)

Labour turnover will increase as a result of implementing such a policy.

5)

None of the above

My answer is 1.I will not go with 2 because employees don't know if they are being monitored and may be the company is working on making a list of employees who are diligent and delinquent to promote them or give incentive accordingly.I MAY BE WRONG.

Given answer:2 /which i dont think is right.What do you guys think?

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
Thanked: 1443 times
Followed by:247 members

by ceilidh.erickson » Sat Nov 29, 2014 10:11 am
What is the source of this question? The question structure is not at all GMAT-like.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:58 am
Thanked: 2 times

by kutlee » Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:21 pm
This question is not very GMATy. But i think Option 1 is tempting. But then monitoring break duration should be the only criterion to judge productivity. Taking long breaks is defenitely possible so as to cheat. But it is equally possible to cheat at work. So option 1 is just a possibility. But answer 2 is defentely possible and employees will defenteily avoid long breaks since they are monitored.