ngk4mba3236 wrote:bottom-line takeaway is:
generally, a clause is not parallel to a non-clause modifiers (such as Verb-ing or Verb-ed),on GMAT.
can we conclude this ?
This rule mischaracterizes why
charge cannot be rephrased as
charging in answer choice E above.
Generally,
as many as must be followed by a verb:
as many DO x as DO y.
In some cases, the verb after
as many as will not be explicitly stated, but its presence will be implied.
E:
Three times as many charge under $8000 as those charging over $16,000.
Since
as many as must be followed by a verb, the portion in blue is not a non-clause.
Rather, it is a CLAUSE with the verb OMITTED.
Since the portion in blue lacks its own verb, the verb from the first clause --
charge -- is implied:
Three times as many CHARGE under $8000 as those charging over $16,000 CHARGE.
The result --
those charging over $16000 charge -- is an error of redundancy.
I would stick to the rule that I cited above:
If a VERB in the first clause changes to a MODIFIER in the second clause, the comparison is almost certain to be wrong.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at
[email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3