@ Bill,
thanks for the response.
I have a couple of more questions
1. How do you make out (1) which subject forms are compound and which are not? (2) which forms of compound subjects use plural form and which use singular form?
2. Can you comment on the that rule? My understanding is as follows
--> when 'that follows a noun without any comma'... the 'that' refers to the immediate preceding noun
--> if there is a comma before 'that'... then the 'that' could refer to the action in the preceding clause or some subject in the preceding clause
Christopher Columbus
@ Bill,
thanks for the response.
I have a couple of more questions
1. How do you make out (1) which subject forms are compound and which are not? (2) which forms of compound subjects use plural form and which use singular form?
2. Can you comment on the that rule? My understanding is as follows
--> when 'that follows a noun without any comma'... the 'that' refers to the immediate preceding noun
--> if there is a comma before 'that'... then the 'that' could refer to the action in the preceding clause or some subject in the preceding clause
thanks for the response.
I have a couple of more questions
1. How do you make out (1) which subject forms are compound and which are not? (2) which forms of compound subjects use plural form and which use singular form?
2. Can you comment on the that rule? My understanding is as follows
--> when 'that follows a noun without any comma'... the 'that' refers to the immediate preceding noun
--> if there is a comma before 'that'... then the 'that' could refer to the action in the preceding clause or some subject in the preceding clause
- Bill@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1248
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Thanked: 503 times
- Followed by:192 members
- GMAT Score:780
"And" is a big giveaway. When you see it used to link two nouns, then it counts as a plural subject. The exception that you brought up ("the chairman and CEO" being the same person) is not something I recall seeing on an official question.namans wrote:@ Bill,
thanks for the response.
I have a couple of more questions
1. How do you make out (1) which subject forms are compound and which are not? (2) which forms of compound subjects use plural form and which use singular form?
This makes sense, and I agree with it. It's used as a relative pronoun, so it should refer to the preceding noun.2. Can you comment on the that rule? My understanding is as follows
--> when 'that follows a noun without any comma'... the 'that' refers to the immediate preceding noun
I'm not quite sure what you mean here. Do you have an example?--> if there is a comma before 'that'... then the 'that' could refer to the action in the preceding clause or some subject in the preceding clause
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays
Visit the Veritas Prep Blog
Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Visit the Veritas Prep Blog
Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
The official problems have tested "x and y" as a singular noun before, but never without proof.Bill@VeritasPrep wrote:The exception that you brought up ("the chairman and CEO" being the same person) is not something I recall seeing on an official question.
E.g., OG13 #85, in which "owning and living..." is a singular noun.
* It's actually essential to recognize that "owning and living" is singular. If you assume by default that it's plural because of the "and", you'll eliminate the correct answer (in which "it" stands for this noun).
* The problem contains proof that "owning and living" is singular, in the form of the verb "is" (in the non-underlined part).
In general:
* "x and y" can be singular-but only if you have positive proof that it is so.
* If there's no proof otherwise, it's safe to assume that "x and y" is plural.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
Thanks Ron! It's great to know this.lunarpower wrote: In general:
* "x and y" can be singular-but only if you have positive proof that it is so.
* If there's no proof otherwise, it's safe to assume that "x and y" is plural.
- Bill@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1248
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Thanked: 503 times
- Followed by:192 members
- GMAT Score:780
Good catch. That's one I hadn't seen in a while.lunarpower wrote:The official problems have tested "x and y" as a singular noun before, but never without proof.Bill@VeritasPrep wrote:The exception that you brought up ("the chairman and CEO" being the same person) is not something I recall seeing on an official question.
E.g., OG13 #85, in which "owning and living..." is a singular noun.
* It's actually essential to recognize that "owning and living" is singular. If you assume by default that it's plural because of the "and", you'll eliminate the correct answer (in which "it" stands for this noun).
* The problem contains proof that "owning and living" is singular, in the form of the verb "is" (in the non-underlined part).
In general:
* "x and y" can be singular-but only if you have positive proof that it is so.
* If there's no proof otherwise, it's safe to assume that "x and y" is plural.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays
Visit the Veritas Prep Blog
Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Visit the Veritas Prep Blog
Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
--> if there is a comma before 'that'... then the 'that' could refer to the action in the preceding clause or some subject in the preceding clause
I'm not quite sure what you mean here. Do you have an example?
I am not sure if this is the best eg... say a parallel structure:
A knows that B is faster than C, that C is faster than D, and that D is faster than E
Here the that does not necessarily refer to the immediate preceding noun, but refers to A.
Is the understanding correct?
- Bill@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1248
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Thanked: 503 times
- Followed by:192 members
- GMAT Score:780
In that case, you have parallel form (A knows that..., that..., and that...) so the relationship is clear.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays
Visit the Veritas Prep Blog
Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Visit the Veritas Prep Blog
Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
In that structure, the clauses starting with "that" are not modifiers at all. They play the role of nouns. There's probably some fancy grammar term for that; I don't know.namans wrote:I am not sure if this is the best eg... say a parallel structure:
A knows that B is faster than C, that C is faster than D, and that D is faster than E
Here the that does not necessarily refer to the immediate preceding noun, but refers to A.
Is the understanding correct?
In any case, nouns don't refer to anything, so neither do these modifiers.
Here are some examples-first with a noun, and second with "that xxx" playing the role of the noun.
Your punctuality was a surprise to everyone.
That you were on time was a surprise to everyone.
She told me the rumor.
She told me that Rachel might be moving to Italy.
Your structure is the same. It's equivalent to, say, "A knows biology, chemistry, and physics."
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
By the way-
The stuff I explained in the immediately preceding post ("that xxxx" as a noun) is one of the most common "fake idioms" that I've seen.
By "fake idiom" I mean that the entire internet thinks it's an idiom, but it's actually not.
For instance, upon seeing "She told me that xxxx", many forum users incorrectly conclude that "tell ... that" is an idiomatic structure. It's not-it's just "tell" followed by an object.
Be careful.
The stuff I explained in the immediately preceding post ("that xxxx" as a noun) is one of the most common "fake idioms" that I've seen.
By "fake idiom" I mean that the entire internet thinks it's an idiom, but it's actually not.
For instance, upon seeing "She told me that xxxx", many forum users incorrectly conclude that "tell ... that" is an idiomatic structure. It's not-it's just "tell" followed by an object.
Be careful.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 10:44 am
Apologies for bumping up this thread. I understand that E is the best fit among the options, but what would be the appropriate reason to eliminate B? As per my understanding, B is a legitimate sentence, albeit in passive form, and given that E presents the answer in active form, it is the correct answer (I may most certainly be wrong.) Does that make sense?maihuna wrote:For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to Personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.
A. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
B. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere have been
decimated
C. devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere that have been decimated
D. devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the Western hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated.
E. the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.
[spoiler]Answer:A/E[/spoiler]
Request the experts to shed light on this.
Thanks a lot!
I am no expert but will try to explain you.infromaniac wrote:Apologies for bumping up this thread. I understand that E is the best fit among the options, but what would be the appropriate reason to eliminate B? As per my understanding, B is a legitimate sentence, albeit in passive form, and given that E presents the answer in active form, it is the correct answer (I may most certainly be wrong.) Does that make sense?maihuna wrote:For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to Personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.
A. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
B. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere have been
decimated
C. devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere that have been decimated
D. devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the Western hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated.
E. the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.
[spoiler]Answer:A/E[/spoiler]
Request the experts to shed light on this.
Thanks a lot!
B says in the name of progress by which---as we know which refers to nearest noun or I say preceding noun most of the times, so here the sentence give meaning that progress decimated people, and this is wrong meaning because progress can't decimate.
- src_saurav
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 7:27 am
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
I posted an explanation, along with the OA, here:src_saurav wrote:between B and E ,i chose E. I do not think the is unnecessary in E. What is OA?
https://www.beatthegmat.com/sc-that-vers ... 81349.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Hi Ron, Hope you are well. Ron, I need to have your attention!lunarpower wrote:hi --Kajiabeat wrote:same confusion!
the first major difference between A and E are two "the" ---before"devastation and enslavement" and before"native peoples", any difference in meaning?
the second difference is the "have/has" used for the "that" clause, which decide what part this clause is modifying. To be honest, I see both way are OK. How can we make judgement here?
Thank you for any instructors to step in(is "step in" here right?).
the "a/an/the" difference has never been explicitly tested on the gmat -- and is almost impossibly difficult for non-native speakers to understand fully -- so you shouldn't worry about that difference.
choice (a) is incorrect because of the singular verb "has", whose only legitimate antecedent is "progress". that doesn't make sense; progress is not what decimated native peoples. the native peoples were decimated by devastation and enslavement, so you need a plural verb.
Ron, I think, GMAC has used the article "the" in option E correctly. If we remove "the'' from option E, it will not work perfectly because of my following analogy....
Example: I know THE man who came here yesterday.
In this example, I'm talking about a specific guy who came here JUST yesterday. There are many people who come in my house regularly. But, yesterday JUST one guy comes. So, I think, we should use the definite article THE in this regard. If I say, I know man who came here yesterday. It'll not work perfectly.
In option A and E,
the word THAT indicate something, which has been occurred definitely and/or specifically by THE devastation and enslavement. Ron, is my understanding correct? I wish to have your response.Thanks....
Last edited by AsadAbu on Wed Nov 11, 2015 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.