• EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep

Canned Tuna

This topic has 1 expert reply and 12 member replies

Canned Tuna

Post Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:18 pm
A year ago, Dietz Foods launched a yearlong advertising campaign for its canned tuna. Last year Dietz sold 12 million cans
of tuna compared to the 10 million sold during the previous year, an increase directly attributable to new customers
brought in by the campaign. Profits from the additional sales, however, were substantially less than the cost of the
advertising campaign. Clearly, therefore, the campaign did nothing to further Dietz's economic interests.
92
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) Sales of canned tuna account for a relatively small percentage of Dietz Foods' profits.
(8) Most of the people who bought Dietz's canned tuna for the first time as a result of the campaign were already loyal
customers of other Dietz products. 3
(C) A less expensive advertising campaign would have brought in significantly fewer new customers for Dietz's canned
tuna than did the campaign Dietz Foods launched last year.
(D) Dietz made money on sales of canned tuna last year.
(E) In each of the past five years, there was a steep, industry-wide decline in sales of canned tuna.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
mankey Legendary Member Default Avatar
Joined
23 Jun 2011
Posted:
627 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
4
Top Reply
Post Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:22 pm
Someone please provide OA for this one.

Thanks.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
singalong Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
09 Feb 2011
Posted:
95 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
1
Top Reply
Post Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:07 am
But if the sales made were a part of the profits, which is apparently less, then wouldn't be the reason why the campaign didn't help in the process?

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
mankey Legendary Member Default Avatar
Joined
23 Jun 2011
Posted:
627 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
4
Post Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:22 pm
Someone please provide OA for this one.

Thanks.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
singalong Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
09 Feb 2011
Posted:
95 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
1
Post Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:07 am
But if the sales made were a part of the profits, which is apparently less, then wouldn't be the reason why the campaign didn't help in the process?

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

GMAT/MBA Expert

Post Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:36 am
We want to weaken the argument that the campaign did nothing to further Dietz's economic interests. In other words, we want to support the argument that the campaign did further Dietz's economic interests.

Answer choice A is out of scope. Looking at the passage, we see that the campaign was for Dietz's canned tuna, not for any of its other products. Whether or not Dietz sells additional products, this question is about how a canned tuna campaign improves canned tuna sales. If this statement is true, Dietz still paid more for the canned tuna campaign than it got in canned tuna sales. Maybe since Dietz has other products, it isn't as big of a loss, but it's still a loss.

Answer choice C is similar. A less expensive campaign may have brought in fewer customers. That doesn't change anything about the campaign Dietz actually ran! Even if the campaign earned Dietz more customers than a less expensive campaign would have, the gain from the new customers is still lower than what Dietz spent on the campaign. A less expensive campaign may have been even less successful, but the campaign that actually happened still lost Dietz money.

_________________


Erika John - Content Manager/Lead Instructor
http://gmat.prepscholar.com/gmat/s/

Learn about our exclusive savings for BTG members (up to 25% off) and our 5 day free trial

Check out our new PrepScholar GMAT YouTube channel, and read our expert guides on the PrepScholar GMAT blog

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Post Sat Sep 09, 2017 9:34 am
Is letter A wrong?
I assume Dietz Foods also has other products..

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Joseph_Alexander Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
14 May 2014
Posted:
45 messages
Upvotes:
1
Post Thu Nov 20, 2014 5:21 am
I was stuck between E and C here.

I eliminated E thinking that in the last 5 years (including the year in which 12MN (Yr 5 - and not Yr6) and 10MN (Yr 4) tins were sold) the industry was in a declining trend. So had the company not advertised so heavily in Yr 5, its sales would have been much lesser than 10MN tins, may be say 8MN tins (if the industry decline rate was 20%). Just because it advertised heavily it had 20% more sales than each of its competitors is the market. This certainly now is an economic benefit! Very Happy

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
singalong Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
09 Feb 2011
Posted:
95 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
1
Post Sat Jan 14, 2012 7:24 pm
a little help here experts..

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
SmarpanGamt Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
08 Mar 2010
Posted:
203 messages
Upvotes:
6
Test Date:
1.12.10
Target GMAT Score:
720
Post Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:00 am
kvcpk wrote:
Sorry.. I am reopening this thread..

Can someone tell me why option A is wrong? There is no mention that canned tuna is the only product of deitz foods.
The argument is on Campaign cost and econmonic of campaign cost t odirect sales. Other products will neither strength or weaken the argument.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
kvcpk Legendary Member
Joined
30 May 2010
Posted:
1893 messages
Followed by:
6 members
Upvotes:
215
Post Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:47 am
Sorry.. I am reopening this thread..

Can someone tell me why option A is wrong? There is no mention that canned tuna is the only product of deitz foods.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Post Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:35 am
OA E

thanks all for sharing your point of view

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
mehravikas Legendary Member Default Avatar
Joined
12 May 2008
Posted:
1161 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
23
Test Date:
********
Target GMAT Score:
740
Post Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:32 pm
Agree. The answer should be E.

papgust wrote:
IMO C neither weakens nor strenghtens the argument. We are only looking to undermine the argument that campaign did nothing to further economic interests. We are not concerned whether a less expensive campaign would have brought in new customers or an expensive campaign would have brought in more new customers.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
papgust Community Manager
Joined
10 Aug 2009
Posted:
1537 messages
Followed by:
240 members
Upvotes:
653
Post Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:17 pm
IMO C neither weakens nor strenghtens the argument. We are only looking to undermine the argument that campaign did nothing to further economic interests. We are not concerned whether a less expensive campaign would have brought in new customers or an expensive campaign would have brought in more new customers.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

Best Conversation Starters

1 lheiannie07 116 topics
2 LUANDATO 67 topics
3 swerve 66 topics
4 ardz24 61 topics
5 AAPL 59 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

Most Active Experts

1 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

213 posts
2 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

177 posts
3 image description Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

168 posts
4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

133 posts
5 image description GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

126 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts