Beat The GMAT

Gmat09_5ALL · Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:35 pm

6.16
Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus. Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques. It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent. Researchers have, however, recently discovered notes of Leibniz’ that discuss one of Newton’s books on mathematics. Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques, and since the
notes were written before Leibniz’ own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false. A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however. Leibniz’ notes are limited to early sections of Newton’s book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques are presented.
In the historian’s reasoning, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends; the second is evidence that has been used to support an opposing position.
B. The first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends; the second is that position.
C. The first provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that is drawn to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends; the second provides evidence against that intermediate conclusion.
D. The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is evidence offered in support of the historian’s own position.
E. The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is further information that substantiates that evidence.

Recommend this topic

Back to top

delhiboy1979 · Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:04 am

Should be D,

The first part is something that the historian doesnt agree to. He uses it as an evidence to a theory he criticizes. The second part is an evidence that the historian uses to support his own theory.
Only D fits these

Back to top

hypermeganet · Thu Oct 01, 2009 11:47 am

Definitely D. As a side note, this stimulus is stolen almost directly from an LSAT exam.

Back to top

Beat The GMAT

Boldface - Newton

Free GMAT Prep Resources

GMAT Prep Discounts

Free Upcoming GMAT Events

Latest GMAT Articles

Latest GMAT Videos

Popular Resources

Course Reviews

Course Locations