• Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep

Bird species around London

This topic has 2 expert replies and 3 member replies
perfectstranger Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
16 Jul 2008
Posted:
177 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Thanked:
2 times
Target GMAT Score:
720

Bird species around London

Post Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:28 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities.
    Each ot the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT:

    (A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.

    (B)Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air

    (C)The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.

    (D)An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable.

    (E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    lvincy Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    12 Jun 2008
    Posted:
    60 messages
    Thanked:
    2 times
    Post Tue Oct 17, 2017 12:58 pm
    Hello,

    I don't have it very clear. Can any expert explain to me please!

    Thanks

    Post Tue Oct 17, 2017 3:51 pm
    At the risk of being obvious, this is a NOT question. You want the choice that is NOT an assumption.

    Now . . .

    The conclusion: Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities. (The word "should" is usually found in conclusions.)

    The evidence: In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically.

    There are a number of assumptions being made here, four of which are in the choices.

    Choice B is an assumption because if air-pollution regulations on industry do not have a significant impact on the quality of the air, then something else was responsible for the bird uptick, and so, NO, one should not impose the rules on other cities.

    Choice C is an assumption because if the air-pollution problems of other major cities are NOT basically similar to those once suffered by London, then the plan to impose the rules on other cities is pointless.

    Choice D is an assumption because if the increase in bird species is NOT desirable, then why try to export the plan?

    Choice E is an assumption because if the increased sightings of bird species in and around London DOES NOT reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area, the regulations did not cause a change. The plan to try the regulation out elsewhere is pointless.

    But Choice A doesn't need to be assumed. This choice uses the word "most" -- "most cities." This does not need to be assumed -- maybe in 50% of cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry. The plan is still reasonable. Also, do the air problems have to be "almost entirely" caused by local industry? What if local industry was a relatively minor factor in air quality? The regulations might still have been enough to help the birds, and the conclusion still stands. The author of this argument does NOT need to assume what Choice A says.

    _________________
    GMAT Prep From The Economist
    We offer 70+ point score improvement money back guarantee.
    Our average student improves 98 points.

    Thanked by: LUANDATO
    Free 7-Day Test Prep with Economist GMAT Tutor - Receive free access to the top-rated GMAT prep course including a 1-on-1 strategy session, 2 full-length tests, and 5 ask-a-tutor messages. Get started now.
    Post Tue Oct 17, 2017 3:54 pm
    I'm available if you'd like any follow up.

    _________________
    GMAT Prep From The Economist
    We offer 70+ point score improvement money back guarantee.
    Our average student improves 98 points.

    Thanked by: LUANDATO
    Free 7-Day Test Prep with Economist GMAT Tutor - Receive free access to the top-rated GMAT prep course including a 1-on-1 strategy session, 2 full-length tests, and 5 ask-a-tutor messages. Get started now.
    TariqOmar Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    24 Aug 2017
    Posted:
    1 messages
    Post Thu Oct 26, 2017 6:09 am
    EconomistGMATTutor wrote:
    At the risk of being obvious, this is a NOT question. You want the choice that is NOT an assumption.

    Now . . .

    The conclusion: Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities. (The word "should" is usually found in conclusions.)

    The evidence: In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically.

    There are a number of assumptions being made here, four of which are in the choices.

    Choice B is an assumption because if air-pollution regulations on industry do not have a significant impact on the quality of the air, then something else was responsible for the bird uptick, and so, NO, one should not impose the rules on other cities.

    Choice C is an assumption because if the air-pollution problems of other major cities are NOT basically similar to those once suffered by London, then the plan to impose the rules on other cities is pointless.

    Choice D is an assumption because if the increase in bird species is NOT desirable, then why try to export the plan?

    Choice E is an assumption because if the increased sightings of bird species in and around London DOES NOT reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area, the regulations did not cause a change. The plan to try the regulation out elsewhere is pointless.

    But Choice A doesn't need to be assumed. This choice uses the word "most" -- "most cities." This does not need to be assumed -- maybe in 50% of cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry. The plan is still reasonable. Also, do the air problems have to be "almost entirely" caused by local industry? What if local industry was a relatively minor factor in air quality? The regulations might still have been enough to help the birds, and the conclusion still stands. The author of this argument does NOT need to assume what Choice A says.
    I truly cannot understand your explanation of choice E being a wrong answer, and choice A being the correct answer.

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 LUANDATO 160 topics
    2 lheiannie07 87 topics
    3 Roland2rule 75 topics
    4 ardz24 60 topics
    5 AAPL 55 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    168 posts
    2 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    130 posts
    3 image description Jay@ManhattanReview

    Manhattan Review

    128 posts
    4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    117 posts
    5 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    103 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts