Welcome! Check out our free B-School Guides to learn how you compare with other applicants.
Login or Register
 

Aristotle LSAT CR - Q 14

This topic has 1 expert reply and 27 member replies
Goto page Previous
Deepthi Subbu Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
Joined
16 Feb 2010
Posted:
287 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Thanked:
2 times
Post Tue Apr 10, 2012 2:28 am
I was between C and E , but chose C just because E has this extreme word ' only ' compared to unsafe . I clearly understand Stuart's response , but am still not satisfied with the explanation . can someone help ?

Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
amit.trivedi@ymail.com GMAT Destroyer!
Joined
09 Nov 2010
Posted:
934 messages
Followed by:
14 members
Thanked:
60 times
Test Date:
N.A
Target GMAT Score:
750
Post Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:21 pm
People always seem to associate high prices of products with high quality. But price is not necessarily an indicator of quality. The best teas are often no more expensive than the lower quality teas.

Which one of the following, if true, does most to explain the counterexample described above?

(A) Packaging and advertising triple the price of all teas

(B) Most people buy low-quality tea, thus keeping its price up

(C) All types of tea are subject to higher import tariffs

(D) Low-quality teas are generally easier to obtain than quality teas

(E) The price of tea generally does not vary from region to region.


I got lost between options D and E. Since causal assumption CRs are very similar to strengthen questions, I chose D. But D actually is out of scope because it is talking about deaths due to some other reasons and not Asthma. Hence we are left with option E.


Also the option E is something like a Defender assumption question.

Lets say if option D was talking about the inhalers themselves aggravating asthma itself, then it would have been a very close call between options D and E.

One is a supporter option and the other is a Defender assumption.

But that will not happen in the GMAT as the test-makers want to make the arguments air-tight and for that only one correct answer choice exists...


Hope this post helps...

_________________
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.

Gaurav 2013-fall Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
Joined
22 Feb 2012
Posted:
296 messages
Thanked:
10 times
Test Date:
2012
Target GMAT Score:
800
GMAT Score:
700
Post Mon May 21, 2012 9:13 am
clearly E

nanushka Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
Joined
17 Apr 2012
Posted:
4 messages
Post Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:45 am
Dear amit.trivedi@ymail.com

What is the answer to the CR example you brought about TEAS?

karthikpandian19 GMAT Titan
Joined
03 Nov 2011
Posted:
1665 messages
Followed by:
63 members
Thanked:
160 times
Target GMAT Score:
750
Post Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:50 pm
Amit, What is the OA and OE for the CR related to TEA PRICE & QUALITY?

IMO B & D are near to the answer choices. All others seems to be irrelevant

Pls explain


amit.trivedi@ymail.com wrote:
People always seem to associate high prices of products with high quality. But price is not necessarily an indicator of quality. The best teas are often no more expensive than the lower quality teas.

Which one of the following, if true, does most to explain the counterexample described above?

(A) Packaging and advertising triple the price of all teas

(B) Most people buy low-quality tea, thus keeping its price up

(C) All types of tea are subject to higher import tariffs

(D) Low-quality teas are generally easier to obtain than quality teas

(E) The price of tea generally does not vary from region to region.


I got lost between options D and E. Since causal assumption CRs are very similar to strengthen questions, I chose D. But D actually is out of scope because it is talking about deaths due to some other reasons and not Asthma. Hence we are left with option E.


Also the option E is something like a Defender assumption question.

Lets say if option D was talking about the inhalers themselves aggravating asthma itself, then it would have been a very close call between options D and E.

One is a supporter option and the other is a Defender assumption.

But that will not happen in the GMAT as the test-makers want to make the arguments air-tight and for that only one correct answer choice exists...


Hope this post helps...

_________________
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" Smile Smile---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

mv12 Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
Joined
29 Apr 2012
Posted:
151 messages
Thanked:
4 times
Post Sun Aug 05, 2012 6:36 am
My take E.

mv12 Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
Joined
29 Apr 2012
Posted:
151 messages
Thanked:
4 times
Post Sun Aug 05, 2012 11:23 am
E it is.

vinodsundaram Rising GMAT Star Default Avatar
Joined
21 May 2012
Posted:
54 messages
Thanked:
1 times
Test Date:
08/16/2012
Target GMAT Score:
720
Post Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:07 am
I agree with Stuart's explanation. In assumption questions, given causes are assumed to be the only reasons for an Effect. Hence Chose E.

But I've a doubt regarding C.
Bronchial inhalers are unsafe, even when used according to the recommended instructions.

Now, when we negate this argument.
Bronchial inhalers are not unsafe.
So including Inhalers as one of the factors for the increase in deaths would be wrong and hence the argument falters.
So shouldn't C also make a valid assumption.


Please Advice.

karthikpandian19 GMAT Titan
Joined
03 Nov 2011
Posted:
1665 messages
Followed by:
63 members
Thanked:
160 times
Target GMAT Score:
750
Post Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:20 pm
Vinod,
(C) Bronchial inhalers are unsafe, even when used according to the recommended
instructions.

From this when you negate the assumption it gives us "Bronchial inhalers are safe when used according to the recommended instructions". Now we have negated and the conclusion (the cause of increased deaths is the use of bronchial inhalers by asthma sufferers to relieve their symptoms)should fall apart, but it isnt.....becoz it(this assumption)is true only when the first two conditions fail.
What if, the first two conditions are true and the bronchial inhaler's fail????

So, shutting down the "ifs", goto the statement E. Negate this and you will see the conclusion fall down




vinodsundaram wrote:
I agree with Stuart's explanation. In assumption questions, given causes are assumed to be the only reasons for an Effect. Hence Chose E.

But I've a doubt regarding C.
Bronchial inhalers are unsafe, even when used according to the recommended instructions.

Now, when we negate this argument.
Bronchial inhalers are not unsafe.
So including Inhalers as one of the factors for the increase in deaths would be wrong and hence the argument falters.
So shouldn't C also make a valid assumption.


Please Advice.

_________________
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" Smile Smile---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

confuse mind GMAT Destroyer! Default Avatar
Joined
19 Jan 2011
Posted:
462 messages
Followed by:
4 members
Thanked:
10 times
Post Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:26 pm
amit.trivedi@ymail.com wrote:
People always seem to associate high prices of products with high quality. But price is not necessarily an indicator of quality. The best teas are often no more expensive than the lower quality teas.

Which one of the following, if true, does most to explain the counterexample described above?

(A) Packaging and advertising triple the price of all teas

(B) Most people buy low-quality tea, thus keeping its price up

(C) All types of tea are subject to higher import tariffs

(D) Low-quality teas are generally easier to obtain than quality teas

(E) The price of tea generally does not vary from region to region.


I got lost between options D and E. Since causal assumption CRs are very similar to strengthen questions, I chose D. But D actually is out of scope because it is talking about deaths due to some other reasons and not Asthma. Hence we are left with option E.


Also the option E is something like a Defender assumption question.

Lets say if option D was talking about the inhalers themselves aggravating asthma itself, then it would have been a very close call between options D and E.

One is a supporter option and the other is a Defender assumption.

But that will not happen in the GMAT as the test-makers want to make the arguments air-tight and for that only one correct answer choice exists...


Hope this post helps...
What is the OA to the tea question you brought here?
IMO - B

ananthrajavadhuta Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
Joined
12 Jan 2011
Posted:
14 messages
Followed by:
2 members
Post Sat Sep 22, 2012 11:57 pm
E.

karthikpandian19 GMAT Titan
Joined
03 Nov 2011
Posted:
1665 messages
Followed by:
63 members
Thanked:
160 times
Target GMAT Score:
750
Post Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:47 pm
There are two questions in this post........


Both of them - E is the answer

confuse mind wrote:
amit.trivedi@ymail.com wrote:
People always seem to associate high prices of products with high quality. But price is not necessarily an indicator of quality. The best teas are often no more expensive than the lower quality teas.

Which one of the following, if true, does most to explain the counterexample described above?

(A) Packaging and advertising triple the price of all teas

(B) Most people buy low-quality tea, thus keeping its price up

(C) All types of tea are subject to higher import tariffs

(D) Low-quality teas are generally easier to obtain than quality teas

(E) The price of tea generally does not vary from region to region.


I got lost between options D and E. Since causal assumption CRs are very similar to strengthen questions, I chose D. But D actually is out of scope because it is talking about deaths due to some other reasons and not Asthma. Hence we are left with option E.


Also the option E is something like a Defender assumption question.

Lets say if option D was talking about the inhalers themselves aggravating asthma itself, then it would have been a very close call between options D and E.

One is a supporter option and the other is a Defender assumption.

But that will not happen in the GMAT as the test-makers want to make the arguments air-tight and for that only one correct answer choice exists...


Hope this post helps...
What is the OA to the tea question you brought here?
IMO - B

_________________
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" Smile Smile---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

umeshpatil Rising GMAT Star
Joined
23 May 2012
Posted:
72 messages
Thanked:
8 times
Target GMAT Score:
800
Post Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:48 pm
(D) The use of bronchial inhalers aggravates other diseases that frequently occur
among asthma sufferers and that often lead to fatal outcomes even when the
asthma itself does not.

(E) Increased urban pollution, improved recording of asthma deaths, and the use of
bronchial inhalers are the only possible explanations of the increased death rate
due to asthma.

I am still confused between D & E. Our conclusion is "the cause of increased deaths is the use
of bronchial inhalers by asthma sufferers to relieve their symptoms". If 'E' is true, then there are different possible reasons behind the asthama. It doesn't strengthen conclusion. I think, E only repeats whatever said in argument. D tries to convince the conclusion. Why D is wrong answer?

karthikpandian19 GMAT Titan
Joined
03 Nov 2011
Posted:
1665 messages
Followed by:
63 members
Thanked:
160 times
Target GMAT Score:
750
Post Tue Sep 25, 2012 9:17 pm
Umesh,

Actually the question is to find out the assumption and not to strengthen. Considering the conclusion E affirms that only these 3 caused are assumed to form the conclusion.


umeshpatil wrote:
(D) The use of bronchial inhalers aggravates other diseases that frequently occur
among asthma sufferers and that often lead to fatal outcomes even when the
asthma itself does not.

(E) Increased urban pollution, improved recording of asthma deaths, and the use of
bronchial inhalers are the only possible explanations of the increased death rate
due to asthma.

I am still confused between D & E. Our conclusion is "the cause of increased deaths is the use
of bronchial inhalers by asthma sufferers to relieve their symptoms". If 'E' is true, then there are different possible reasons behind the asthama. It doesn't strengthen conclusion. I think, E only repeats whatever said in argument. D tries to convince the conclusion. Why D is wrong answer?

_________________
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" Smile Smile---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

Best Conversation Starters

1 vipulgoyal 32 topics
2 hemant_rajput 23 topics
3 guerrero 18 topics
4 abhirup1711 17 topics
5 sana.noor 16 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

Most Active Experts

1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

211 posts
2 image description GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

137 posts
3 image description Jim@StratusPrep

Stratus Prep

60 posts
4 image description Jon@Admissionado

Admissionado

49 posts
5 image description David@VeritasPrep

Veritas Prep

31 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts