• Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    Target Test Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    Veritas Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    Economist Test Prep
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    Varsity Tutors

Apogee Company AWA (Please review!!)

This topic has 1 member reply

Rate the essay

0% (0 votes)
0% (0 votes)
0% (0 votes)
0% (0 votes)
100% (1 votes)
0% (0 votes)
PratikshaSuresh Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
18 Aug 2016
2 messages

Apogee Company AWA (Please review!!)

Post Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:07 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
    The following appeared in a memorandum from the business department of the Apogee Company:
    "When the Apogee Company had all its operations in one location, it was more profitable than it is today. Therefore, the Apogee Company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location. Such centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees."

    This argument is weak for several reasons, mainly because it makes several assumptions and provides no evidence in concluding that it will be more profitable for Apogee Company to close all its field offices and operate from a single, centralized location.
    Firstly, the argument assumes that operating from a single location will still be as profitable as it was in the past. What it does not consider is that the scene could have changed at the location. There may be more competition for Apogee Company than before in that location. The cost of production, operation and labour may have increased. If these changes have taken place, it may no longer be profitable for the company to set up its operations in only that location.
    Secondly, the argument assumes that operating at different locations is not profitable in the long run. Setting up field offices and operations at different locations initially incurs expenses from the company which may cut into the profits. However, as the company expands its operations in the new locations, it may also gain new clients and projects. This kind of expansion is important for the company and will increase its profitability in the long term. Projections of profits, client base and future costs are some of the facts that may have helped in analysing whether the shutting down of operations at a particular location may have increased the profitability of the company in the long term. Had the argument referred to any of these, it could have been strengthened.
    Thirdly, the argument fails to establish that operating from a single location is profitable for the company. It states that by operating from a single location the company can cut costs and supervise employees but assumes that the company does not have projects at different locations. If it does then it would still need to spend on travel expenses and third party vendors to supervise such projects. This may result in expenditure greater than what the company saves by operating from a single location. If the argument had stated that all the projects undertaken by the company were only in the current location then the company would definitely cut costs and effectively supervise employees and the argument would have been strengthened.
    Because the argument makes several unwarranted assumptions and does not back up its claims with proper evidence and facts, it is unreliable and should not be the basis for making the decision suggested in the argument.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    Christian Krause Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts Default Avatar
    11 Aug 2016
    4 messages
    2 times
    Post Thu Oct 06, 2016 3:49 am

    I believe you adequately addressed the flaws in this argument. However, I believe you´re focusing a little bit too much on your own alternative scenario in paragraph 2. I think it would have been sufficient to state that the author fails to consider the revenue/income side of operating at several locations and that it might be favorable in terms of sales, cash flow etc. You´re painting your own picture a little too much at this point.
    Other than that, very well written. To get to a 6, I suggest focusing more on what the author did wrong/ didn´t do rather than focusing too much on what he could have done.

    Thanked by: PratikshaSuresh

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 180 topics
    2 lheiannie07 61 topics
    3 Roland2rule 54 topics
    4 ardz24 44 topics
    5 VJesus12 14 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    155 posts
    2 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...


    105 posts
    3 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    101 posts
    4 image description Jay@ManhattanReview

    Manhattan Review

    82 posts
    5 image description Matt@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    80 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts